In:Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 9] 2015
► pp. 31–48
Cultural differences in political debate
Comparing face threats in U.S., Great Britain, and Egyptian Campaign Debates
Published online: 30 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.9.02hin
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.9.02hin
We compared recent historical debates from the U.S., Great Britain, and Egypt using politeness theory to determine if there were significant cultural differences and/or similarities in the way candidates argued for high office. The transcripts from these debates were coded using a schema based on face threats used in debates. Results indicate some differences between the way U.S. presidential candidates, British leaders, and Egyptian leaders initiate and manage face threats on leadership and competence.
Keywords: campaign debate, cultural difference, politeness
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
