In:Political Argumentation in the United States: Historical and contemporary studies
David Zarefsky
[Argumentation in Context 7] 2014
► pp. 51–62
Debating slavery by proxy
The Texas annexation controversy
Published online: 24 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.7.03ch3
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.7.03ch3
After having been kept off the agenda of mainstream politics for 25 years, the issue of slavery’s possible expansion took center stage in the mid-1840s because it was mixed together with the proposed annexation of Texas. Debate on the proposed annexation treaty of 1844 was characterized by discussion of other issues that served as proxies for the question of slavery, which many politicians wished to avoid. After the treaty was defeated and President John Tyler urged Congress to annex Texas by joint resolution, the debate revealed much more openness to the discussion of slavery both as a reason for and a reason against annexation. These subtle but significant shifts reflected a changed understanding of what the slavery question was, and they put the nation on the path that led to civil war.
References (8)
Perelman, Ch. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (Originally published in French in 1958).
Silbey, J. (2005). Storm over Texas: The annexation controversy and the road to Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press.
U.S. Congressional Globe. (1844). 28th Congress, 1st session.
. (1844a). 28th Congress, 1st session. Appendix volume.
. (1845). 28th Congress, 2d session.
U.S. Congressional Globe. (1845a). 28th Congress, 2d session. Appendix volume.
U.S. Senate Documents. (1844). 28th Congress, 1st session. Vol. 341; Serial No. 435
U.S. Senate Executive Journal. (1844). 28th Congress, 1st session (pp.267–261). April 22.
