In:Political Argumentation in the United States: Historical and contemporary studies
David Zarefsky
[Argumentation in Context 7] 2014
► pp. 255–280
Making the case for war
Colin Powell at the United Nations
Published online: 24 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.7.13ch13
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.7.13ch13
Largely because of his personal credibility, Secretary of State Colin Powell was chosen to present the Bush Administration’s case for military action against Iraq. The scene resembled Adlai Stevenson’s speech during the Cuban missile crisis. Although he presented other arguments as well, Powell focused on the danger that Iraq might be developing weapons of mass destruction. Powell’s case was well organized, incorporating subordinative, multiple, and coordinative arguments strategically, and the inferences from premises to conclusions were reasonable. In retrospect, the flaw in the speech was in the accuracy of the evidence, a concept which scholars of argument have undertheorized.
References (64)
Andrade, J. (2003). Though Powell was brilliant … his evidence did not measure up. Chicago Sun-Times, February 7, p. 33.
Auster, B.B., Mazzetti, M. & Pound, E.T. (2003). Truth and consequences. U.S. News and World Report, June 9, p. 14.
Balz, D. (2003). Carter says Bush has “not made a case” for war. Washington Post, February 1, p. A18.
Berkowitz, B. (2003). The big difference between intelligence and evidence. Washington Post, February 2, p. B1.
Bush, G.W. (2003). State of the Union address. Available at [URL][URL] (accessed November 10, 2006).
Cornwall, R. (2003a). Iraq the threat of war: Powell to present “proof” of Saddam’s banned weapons. The Independent [London],January 30, p. 2.
. (2003b). A masterly display by a trusted American. The Independent [London], February 6, title page.
Dao, J. & Shanker, T. (2003). After the war: Evidence; Powell defends information he used to justify Iraq war. New York Times, May 31, p. A6.
Eemeren, F.H. van, Grootendorst, R. & Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. (2002). Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gordon, M.R. (2003). Threats and responses: News analysis; Powell’s trademark: Overwhelm them. New York Times, February 6, p. A1.
Hartnett, S.J. & Stengrim, L.A. (2006). Globalization and empire: The U.S. invasion of Iraq, free markets, and the twilight of democracy. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Hirsh, M. & Isikoff, M. with others. (2003). No more hide and seek. Newsweek, February 10, pp. 42–46.
Hitt, G. (2003). State of the Union: The day after: U.S. stand on Iraq is entering “final phase” – With time running out, White House to meet allies on need for military action. Wall Street Journal, January 30, p. A10.
Kessler, G. (2003). Powell: Case “compelling” without “smoking gun.” Washington Post, February 4, p. A18.
. (2004). Analyst questioned sources’ reliability; warning came before Powell report to U.N. Washington Post,July 10, p. A9.
Kessler, G. & DeYoung, K. (2003). Powell to tell U.N. Council of arms evidence. Washington Post, January 29, p. A1.
Kessler, G. & Lynch, C. (2003a). Powell hones Iraq evidence for crucial U.N. address. Washington Post, February 5, p. A1.
. (2003b). Powell lays out case against Iraq: Evidence shows Hussein foiled inspections, Secretary tells U.N. Washington Post, February 6, p. A1.
Klumpp, J.F. (2006). Facts, truth, and Iraq: A call to stewardship of democratic argument. In Engaging Argument (Patricia Riley, Ed.), pp. 1–17. Washington: National Communication Association.
Leeman, R.W. (2005). Colin Luther Powell. In American voices: An encyclopedia of contemporary oratory (B.K. Duffy & R.W. Leeman, Ed.), pp. 368–377. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Moore, M.T. (2003). Disorder takes over for a day at usually staid U.N. building. USA Today, February 6, p. 10A.
Nichols, B. & Slavin, B. (2004). What comes to light in Iraq reflects on Powell. USA Today, February 5, p. 12A.
Preston, J. (2003). Threats and responses: Report to Council; U.S. inspector says Iraq falls short on cooperation. New York Times, January 28, p. A1.
Preston, J. & Weisman, S.R. (2003). Threats and responses: Diplomacy; Powell to charge Iraq is shifting its illegal arms to foil inspectors. New York Times, February 5, p. A1.
Priest, D. (2003). Telling secrets: Not just what, but how; speech is revealing on gathering intelligence. Washington Post, February 6, p. A23.
Purdum, T.S. (2002). Threats and responses: The administration, Bush officials say the time has come for action on Iraq. New York Times, September 9, pp. A1, A8.
Ritchburg, K.B. (2003). Speech fails to budge Europeans from their divergent positions. Washington Post, February 6, p. A30.
Robbins, C.A. & Cloud, D.S. (2003). As the U.S. pressures Iraq, a flurry of initiatives – Officials say belief of link to al Qaeda appears hard to prove. Wall Street Journal, January 31, p. A8.
Sanger, D.E. (2003). Threats and responses: Intelligence; Bush officials debate release of Iraqi secrets. New York Times, January 30, p. A1.
Sengupta, K. (2003). Intelligence agencies doubt al-Qa’ida links. The Independent, February 4 (Foreign news, p. 12).
Slavin, B. & Diamond, J. (2003). Case is strongest when “biggest dove” makes it. USA Today, February 6, p. 10A.
Slevin, P. (2003). Data on efforts to hide arms called “strong suit” of speech. Washington Post. February 6, p. A28.
Stillion Southard, B. (2005). Heightened alert: The altered role of “evidence” in the “case” for war. In Critical Problems in Argumentation (C.A. Willard, Ed.), pp. 733–739. Washington: National Communication Association.
Suskind, R. (2006). The one percent doctrine: Deep inside America’s pursuit of its enemies since 9/11. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Threats and responses: European press; Powell’s performance earns mixed reviews. (2003). New York Times, February 7, p. A10.
USA Today/CNN/Gallup Poll. (2003). February 4, p. 9A.
Walton, D.N. (1996). Arguments from ignorance. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Weisman, S.R. (2003). Threats and responses: Security Council; Powell, in U.N. speech, presents case to show Iraq has not disarmed. New York Times, February 6, p. A1.
. (2005). Powell calls his U.N. speech a lasting blot on his record. New York Times, September 9, p. A10.
