Cover not available

In:Let's talk politics: New essays on deliberative rhetoric
Edited by Hilde Van Belle, Kris Rutten, Paul Gillaerts, Dorien Van De Mieroop and Baldwin Van Gorp
[Argumentation in Context 6] 2014
► pp. 185204

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (32)
References
Bayley, P. (2004). Introduction. In P. Bayley(Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse (pp. 1–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives . Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Candlin, C. N. (1997). General Editor’s Preface. In B-L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, & B. Norberg (Eds.), The construction of professional discourse (pp. ix-xiv). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charland, M. (2001). Constitutive rhetoric. In J. O. Sloan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of rhetoric (pp. 616–619). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dubinski, K. (1999). Okragly stol . Warszawa: KAP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language . Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geremek, B. (2009). Trzeba bylo wygrac. In Rewolucja ‘ 89 (pp. 60–71). Warszawa: Polityka.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gunn, J. A. W. (2009). When the French tried to be British: Party, opposition, and the quest for civil disagreement , 1814–1848. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hibbing, J. R., & Patterson, S. C. (1994). The emergence of democratic parliaments in Central and Eastern Europe. In J. R. Hibbing, & S. C. Patterson (Eds.), Parliaments in the modern world: Changing institutions (pp. 129–150). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ihalainen, P., & Palonen, K. (2009). Parliamentary sources in the comparative study of conceptual history: Methodological aspects and illustrations of a research proposal. Parliaments, Estates, & Representation , 29, 17–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackiewicz, I. (1996). Nowe role w nowym sejmie: Poslowie sejmu okresu transformacji 1989–1993. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (1999). Introduction: Perspectives on discourse analysis. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 1–44) . London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kozakiewicz, M. (1992). Bylem marszalkiem kontraktowego . Warszawa: BGW.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kraczkowski, R. (1997). Sejm w okresie PRL. In J. Bardach(Ed.), Dzieje sejmu polskiego (pp. 265–306). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time . London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGee, M. C. (1975). In search of ‘the people’: A rhetorical alternative. The Quarterly Journal of Speech , 61(3), 235–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1980). The ‘ideograph’: A link between rhetoric and ideology. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66, 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olson, D. M., & Norton, P. (1996). Legislatures in democratic transitions. In D. M. Olson & P. Norton (Eds.), The new parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 1–15). London & Portland, OR: Frank Cass.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ornatowski, C. M. (2010). Parliamentary discourse and political transition: The case of the Polish parliament after 1989.” In C. Ilie (Ed.), European parliaments under scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practices (pp. 223–264). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011). Constructing pluralism: Identification and division in the political transformation of Poland.” In A. de Velasco & M. Lehn (Eds.), Rhetoric: Concord and controversy (pp. 41–51). Long Grove, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palonen, K. (2003). Four times of politics: Policy, polity, politicking, and politicization. Alternatives 28(2), 171–186.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). Towards a history of parliamentary concepts. Parliaments, Estates, & Representation , 32 (2), 123–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patterson, S. C., & Copeland, G. W. (1994). Parliaments in the Twenty-First Century. In G. W. Copeland & S. C. Patterson (Eds.), Parliaments in the modern world: Changing institutions (pp. 1–12). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rolicki, J. (1990). Edward Gierek: Przerwana dekada . Warszawa: BGW.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (1985). The crisis of parliamentary democracy . Trans. E. Kennedy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scruton, R. (Ed.). (1982). A dictionary of political thought . New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, M. D. (1996). Institutional development of Poland’s post-communist Sejm: A comparative analysis. In D. M. Olson & P. Norton (Eds.), The new parliaments of Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 60–81). London and Portland, OR: Frank Cass.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tindale, C. W. (2004). Rhetorical argumentation: Principles of theory and practice . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & R. Grootendorst. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective . Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, A. (2002). Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation . Mahvah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Haaften, Ton. (2011). Parliamentary debate and political culture: The Dutch case. In T. Van Haaften, H. Jansen, J. de Jong, & W. Koetsenruijter (Eds.), Bending opinion: Essays on persuasion in the public domain (pp. 349–368). Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vatz, R. E. (2009). The mythical status of situational rhetoric: Implications for rhetorical critics’ relevance in the public arena. The Review of Communication 9(1), 1–5. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila & Dale Hample
2022. “Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing. Argumentation 36:3  pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
Nowak, Bartholomäus
2016. Posing Questions without Asking. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61:1  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Nowak, Bartholomäus
2019. Impoliteness in parliamentary questions. In Political discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 84],  pp. 147 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue