In:Let's talk politics: New essays on deliberative rhetoric
Edited by Hilde Van Belle, Kris Rutten, Paul Gillaerts, Dorien Van De Mieroop and Baldwin Van Gorp
[Argumentation in Context 6] 2014
► pp. 99–114
Correlative markers in EU-parliamentary French debate
The case of non seulement… mais in comparison to et meme
Published online: 30 April 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.6.06sve
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.6.06sve
The purpose of this paper is to describe the function of non seulement… mais (‘not only… but’) and et même (‘and even’) in the organization of argumentation in EU-parliamentary debate. They both reinforce the argumentation for a conclusion, but they behave differently on a textual-discursive level. Et même marks a difference in argumentative force between arguments, whereas non seulement… mais can also be used as a purely additive marker without implication on the scalarity between the arguments. This study is based on C-ParlEur. Corpus de discours du PARLement EURopéen consisting of 919 speeches during the debates delivered by the 78 French MEPs during the April 2006–March 2008 period.
References (21)
Adam, Jean-Michel. 1990.
Éléments de linguistique textuelle – théorie et pratique de l’analyse textuelle
. Liège: Pierre Mardaga.
Altmann, Hans. 1976.
Die Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik
. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Ducrot, Oswald. 1982. “Note sur l’argumentation et l’acte d’argumenter.”
Cahiers de linguistique française
4: 143–163.
Foolen, Ad. 1991. “Polyfunctionality and the semantics of adversative conjunctions.”
Multilingua
10(1–2): 79–92.
König, Ekkehard. 1991.
The Meaning of Focus Particles. A Comparative Perspective
. London: Routledge.
Kronning, Hans. 1996.
Modalité, cognition et polysémie : sémantique du verbe modal
devoir. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
Nølke, Henning. 1993.
Le regard du locuteur. Pour une linguistique des traces énonciatives
. Paris: Kimé.
Norén, Coco. 2009. “La ScaPoline appliquée sur corpus. L’exemple du pronom
on
.”
Langue française
164: 137–148.
. 2010. “La séquence présidentielle au Parlement Européen. Genre et argumentation.” In
Actes du XVIIe Colloque des romanistes scandinaves
, edited by Jukka Havu, Carita Klippi, Soili Hakulinen, Philippe Jacob, and José Santisteban Fernández, 914–931. Tampere: Tampere University Press, Tampere Studies in Language, Translation and Culture.
Olsson-Jonasson, Kerstin. 1981. “Thème, rhème, focus et la construction avec l’attribut de l’objet.”
Lingvisticae Investigationes
5: 137–168.
Roulet, Eddy. 2006. “The description of text relation markers in the Geneva model of discourse organization.” In
Approaches to discourse particles
, edited by Kerstin Fischer, 115–131. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Roulet, Eddy, Antoine Auchlin, Jacques Moeschler, Christian Rubattel, and Marianne Schelling. 1985.
L’articulation du discours en français contemporain
. Bern: Peter Lang.
Roulet, Eddy, Laurent Fillietaz, and Anne Grobet. 2001.
Un modèle et un instrument d’analyse de l’organisation du discours
. Bern: Peter Lang.
Sudhoff, Stefan. 2010.
Focus Particles in German
. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
www.europarl.eu, accessed January 21. 2011 and August 15. 2012
