References (5)
References
Freeman, J. B.: 2005. Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krabbe, Erik C. W.: 2003. ‘Metadialogues,’ in Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Anyone Who has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of argumentation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht [etc.], pp. 83–90 [ = Chapter 9 in this volume]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., and R. Grootendorst: 1984. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion, Foris Publications, Dordrecht/Cinnaminson, NJ. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
: 1992. Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, NJ/Hove, Hillsdale and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
: 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue