Cover not available

In:Exploring Dialogue: Selected essays on argumentation by Erik C. W. Krabbe with contributions by Jan Albert van Laar
Edited by Erik C.W. Krabbe and Jan Albert van Laar
[Argumentation in Context 23] 2026
► pp. 157–165

Chapter 9
Metadialogues

This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Examples
  • 3.Research
  • 4.Dialectical rules for metadialogue
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (12)
References
Aristotle (1965). On Sophistical Refutations, On Coming-to-be and Passing Away (translated by E. S. Forster), On the Cosmos (translated by D. J. Furley). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, and London: William Heinemann (Loeb Classical Library). First printed 1955.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Finocchiaro, M. (1980). Galileo and the Art of Reasoning: Rhetorical Foundations of Logic and Scientific Method. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamblin, Ch. L. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krabbe, E. C. W. (2002). Profiles of dialogue as a dialectical tool. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 153–167). Amsterdam: Sic Sat and Newport News, VA: Vale Press [Chapter 4 in this volume].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. D. (1979). How to stop talking to tortoises. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 20, 705–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1981). The dialectics of logic. Logique et analyse, n.s. 24, 159–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McBurney, P., & Parsons, S. (2002). Games that agents play: A formal framework for dialogues between autonomous agents. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 11 (3), 315–334. Special Issue on Logic and Games. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plato (1961). The Collected Dialogues of Plato Including the Letters (Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns, Eds.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (Bollingen Series 71).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Protagoras (transl. with notes by C. C. W. Taylor). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ, Hove, and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Laar, J. A. (2002). Equivocation in dialectical perspective. In Argumentation and its Applications (CD-ROM, Proceedings from the Conference of The Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, May 17–19, 2001, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario). To be published.
(2003). The Dialectic of Ambiguity: A Contribution to the Study of Argumentation (dissertation). Groningen University. Forthcoming.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue