In:Exploring Dialogue: Selected essays on argumentation by Erik C. W. Krabbe with contributions by Jan Albert van Laar
Edited by Erik C.W. Krabbe and Jan Albert van Laar
[Argumentation in Context 23] 2026
► pp. 142–156
Chapter 8Meeting in the house of Callias
An historical perspective on rhetoric and dialectic
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Article outline
- 1.The antagonism between rhetoric and dialectic
- 2.Types and goals of dialectic
- 3.Types and goals of rhetoric
- 4.Differences and common features
- 5.Dialectic and rhetoric in practice
- 6.Intertwining at a practical level: Embedding
- 7.Intertwining at a theoretical level: Integrated analysis
Notes References
References (23)
Aristotle (1965). On
Sophistical Refutations, On Coming-to-be and Passing
Away (Transl. E. S. Forster), On
the
Cosmos (Transl. D. J. Furley). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, and London: William Heinemann (Loeb Classical
Library). First printed
1955.
(1976). Posterior
Analytics (Transl. Hugh Tredennick), Topica (Transl. E. S. Forster). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, and London: William Heinemann (Loeb Classical library). First
printed 1960.
(1991). The
’Art’ of
Rhetoric (Transl. John Henry Freese). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, and London: William Heinemann (Loeb
Classical
Library). First published
1926.
Barth, E. M. & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1982). From
Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of logics and
Argumentation. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Bolton, R. (1994). The
Problem of Dialectical Reasoning
(Syllogismos) in
Aristotle. Ancient
Philosophy 14, 99–132.
Krabbe, E. C. W. (2000). Meeting
in the House of Callias: Rhetoric and
Dialectic. Argumentation 14, 205–217.
(2002). Strategies
in Dialectic and
Rhetoric. To be published in
the Proceedings from the
Conference Argumentation and its
Applications of The Ontario Society for the
Study of Argumentation, May
17–19, 2001, at the University
of Windsor, Ontario (appeared in 2004).
Plato (1961). The
Collected Dialogues of Plato Including the
letters (Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns, Eds.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (Bollingen
Series 71).
Robinson, R. (1970). Plato’s
Earlier Dialectic, 2nd
ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press. First edition
1941.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech
Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for
the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving
Conflicts of
Opinion. Dordrecht & Cinnaminson: Foris.
(1992). Argumentation,
Communication, and
Fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ, Hove & London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (1999). Delivering
the Goods in Critical
Discussion. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and Ch. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings
of the Fourth International Conference of the International
Society for the Study of
Argumentation (pp. 163–167). Amsterdam: SIC SAT, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation.
(1999a). William
the Silent’s Argumentative
Discourse. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, & Ch. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings
of the Fourth International Conference of the International
Society for the Study of
Argumentation (pp. 168–171). Amsterdam: SIC SAT, International Centre for the Study of Argumentation.
(2000). Rhetorical
Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework: The Case of
R. J.
Reynolds. Argumentation 14, 293–305.
(2002). Fallacies
as Derailments of Strategic
Maneuvering. To be
published in the Proceedings of the Twelfth NCA/AFA
Conference on
Argumentation, August
2–5, 200
I, at Alta,
Utah.
