In:Exploring Dialogue: Selected essays on argumentation by Erik C. W. Krabbe with contributions by Jan Albert van Laar
Edited by Erik C.W. Krabbe and Jan Albert van Laar
[Argumentation in Context 23] 2026
► pp. 30–44
Chapter 2Who is afraid of figure of speech?
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Aristotle’s treatment of the fallacy of figure of speech
- Case 1
- Case 2
- Case 3
- Case 4
- 3.How serious is the fallacy of figure of speech?
- Case 5
- Case 6
- Case 7
- Case 8
- 4.A fallacy of ambiguity or a non sequitur?
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (14)
Aristotle: 1928. The
Works of Aristotle Translated into
English, Vol. I (W. D. Ross, ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, and Geoffrey Cumberlege, London.
: 1958. Aristotelis
Topica et Sophistici Elenchi (W. D. Ross, ed.), Clarendon Press, Oxford (Oxford
Classical Texts).
: 1965. Aristotle:
On Sophistical Refutations, On Coming-to-be and
Passing-away, E. S. Forster (ed.), On
the Cosmos, D. J. Furley (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, and William Heinemann, London (Loeb Classical
Library).
Hamblin, Charles L.: 1970. Fallacies, Methuen, London. Reprinted
by Vale Press, Newport News VA, 1986.
Krabbe, Erik C. W.: 1995. ‘Can
We Ever Pin One Down to a Formal
Fallacy?’, in Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair and Charles A. Willard (eds.), Proceedings
of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation (University of
Amsterdam, June 21–24, 1994), II: Analysis and
Evaluation, Sic Sat: International Centre for the Study of Argumentation, Amsterdam, pp. 333–344. Also
in: Theo A. F. Kuipers and Anne Ruth Mackor (eds.), Cognitive
Patterns in Science and Common Sense: Groningen Studies in
Philosophy of Science, Logic, and
Epistemology, Rodopi, Amsterdam and Atlanta GA, 1995. pp. 151–164. And
also in: Johan van Benthem, Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst and Frank Veltman (eds.), Logic
and
Argumentation, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1996. pp. 129–141. [= Chapter
1 in this volume.]
Meinong, Alexius: 1904. ‘Über
Gegenstandstheorie’, in Alexius Meinong et al., Untersuchungen
zur Gegenstandstheorie und
Psychologie, Johann Ambrosius Barth, Leipzig, pp. 20ff.
Mill, John Stuart: 1972. ‘Utilitarianism’, in John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism,
Liberty, Representative Government, Selections from Auguste
Comte and Positivism (H. B. Acton, ed.), Dent, London, pp. 1–61. First
edition 1910. ‘Utilitarianism’
originally appeared in parts in Fraser’s
Magazine, 1861.
Russell, Bertrand: 1905. ‘On
Denoting’, Mind, n.s. 14, 479–493. Reprinted
in: Bertrand Russell, Logic
and Knowledge: Essays
1901–1950 (R. C. Marsh, ed.), Allen & Unwin, London, and Macmillan, New York, 1956. pp. 41–56.
Ryle, Gilbert: 1931. ‘Systematically
Misleading
Expressions’, Proceedings of
the Aristotelian
Society 32 (1931–32). Reprinted
in Flew (1968), pp. 11–36.
van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst: 1992. Argumentation,
Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical
Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ, Hove, and London.
