Cover not available

In:Persuasion in Specialized Discourse: A multidisciplinary perspective
Edited by Chiara Degano, Dora Renna and Francesca Santulli
[Argumentation in Context 22] 2024
► pp. 265–268

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Index

Published online: 25 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.22.index

A

  • acceptability, 5, 30, 50–51, 60, 144, 150–51, 170, 184, 189–91
  • activity type, 6–9, 13, 16, 117, 151
  • adjudication, 5, 7
  • agreement, 49, 55–56, 61–62, 64–65, 67–68, 74, 123, 253
  • Amossy, 2, 11, 96, 112, 199
  • AMT (Argumentum Model of Topics), 116–19, 125
  • analogy, 39, 82, 99–100, 105, 108, 150
  • Anarchical Fallacies, 17, 232, 239, 241, 245
  • Antelmi, 2, 12
  • argumentation
    • comparison, 192, 198–99, 207
    • means-end, 125
    • symptomatic, 148–49, 191, 199, 204, 207
  • argumentation in artificial intelligence, 30
  • Argumentation mining, 30, 38
  • argumentation schemes, 8, 49, 101, 113, 118, 189, 191, 194–96, 199, 204, 207
  • argumentation stage, 7, 50
  • argumentation structure, 8, 118, 134, 138, 191, 194, 198
  • argumentative activity types, 9
  • argumentative hyper-genre, 137
  • argumentative indicators, 52, 67, 207
  • argumentative indicators of starting points, 52
  • argumentative patterns, 117–18, 131, 189, 192, 206
    • basic, 189
  • argumentative style, 16, 134, 137–38, 148, 190
    • hybrid, 134, 151
  • argumentative text type, 6
  • argument mining, 12, 27, 38
  • Argument reconstructions, 119, 125
  • arguments
    • ad personam, 244
    • basic, 125
    • comparative, 199
    • comparison, 204
    • fallacious, 97
    • field-dependent, 5
    • implicit, 205
    • practical, 201
    • pragmatic, 55, 61, 75, 84, 125
    • rhetorical, 232–33, 238, 245
    • symptomatic, 100, 139–40, 142–43, 146, 149
  • argument schemes
    • Argumentum Model of Topics.
     See AMT
  • Aristotelian topoi, 10
  • Aristotelian tradition, 36, 39
  • Aristotle, 5, 16, 49, 96, 154–56, 163–64, 173, 193
  • Aristotle’s enthymemic knowledge, 164
  • artificial intelligence, 25, 29–30
  • audience, particular, 48, 65

B

  • Barthes, 156
  • book of fallacies, 232–33, 242, 245

C

  • Candlin, 4–5
  • charity of interpretation, 67
  • citations, 15, 92, 95, 98, 103, 105–6
  • cognition, 31, 169–70
  • collocates, 32, 37–40
  • collocation analysis, 37, 40
  • communicative activity types, 6, 8, 16, 117, 134, 190
  • communities, interpretive, 158
  • complements, 119, 147, 174
  • complex argumentation, 147
  • computational argumentation, 13–14, 30, 37–39
  • concessions, 64, 180
  • concordances, 32, 39–40, 54, 58–59
  • constellation, 118, 189, 191
  • construction, concessive, 61–62, 68
  • contrast, connective adjuncts of, 179–80
  • coordinative argumentation, 147, 176
    • complementary, 194
  • coordinative argumentation structure, 134, 147
  • coordinative indicator, linguistic, 203
  • corporate social responsibility (CSR), 106
  • corpus linguistics, 12, 37
  • counterarguments, 17, 160
  • creeping crisis, 71, 88
  • crisis, 71–72, 85, 87, 158
  • critical discussion, 1–2, 8, 14, 47, 49–50, 67–68, 113, 244, 254
  • cultures, 11–12, 119, 145, 163, 171

D

  • deliberation, 7, 13, 17, 111–12, 125
  • design, 1, 7, 228, 244
  • detached argumentative style, 148–49
  • dialectical, 8, 34–35, 38
  • dialectical profiles, 47, 52, 68
  • dialectics, 36, 39–40, 191
  • dialogue games, 248–50, 253–55, 257–61
  • dialogue types, 6–7
  • difference of opinion, 46, 49, 67, 113, 116, 118, 137, 169, 197, 203, 254
  • dilemma, 75, 82, 86–88, 199
  • disagreement, 75–76, 237, 240, 260
  • disjunction, 258–59
  • disjunctive premise, 75, 82, 86, 88
  • Doury, 10, 67
  • Ducrot, 9–11, 191, 211

E

  • EAP genres, 19
  • Eemeren, 50, 69
  • emotions, negative, 164, 254
  • emotions in argumentative discourse, 10
  • endoxon, 11–12, 49, 119, 127
  • engagement, 61, 111, 153–54, 178, 228, 261
  • epistemic vigilance, 97, 211
  • establishing starting points, 48, 50
  • evaluation, 24, 104, 107, 159–60, 174, 177–78, 183–84, 190–91
  • evaluation of argumentation, 190
  • evaluation of arguments, 24
  • evaluative starting points, 148–49
  • explanations, 50, 95, 194, 198, 206, 238, 252, 262
  • exploitation, 13, 15, 112

F

  • Fairclough, 96
  • fallacies, 8, 92, 104, 107, 232–36, 239, 242
  • field-invariant, 5–6
  • Foucault, 153–54, 153–54, 156–59
  • framing, 76, 83, 106, 130
  • framing strategies, 71–91
  • function
    • communicative, 113, 213
    • pragmatic, 135, 177
  • Functional Grammar, 3

G

  • game, 205, 250, 253, 255–58, 260, 262
  • Garssen, 139, 195
  • Garzone, 4–5, 12, 95
  • genre analysis, 2–4, 7–8
  • genres, 2–5, 7, 12, 15, 66, 68, 93, 148
    • epideictic, 67–68
  • Goffman, 2, 65
  • Grootendorst, 39, 113, 116, 233

H

  • Halliday, 3, 6, 46, 192
  • Harris, 37, 193, 212–13, 215–16
  • Heringer, 260–61
  • Houtlosser, 31, 117

I

  • implications, pragmatic, 212–13, 216
  • implicatures, 51, 97, 100, 211, 213–18, 220–24, 226
    • conversational, 214
    • scalar, 214
  • implicatures and vague expressions, 97
  • implicitating strategies, 213, 217, 220–21, 225
  • implicit claim, 121
  • implicit communication, 212, 216
  • implicit information processing, 216
  • implicit linguistic meanings, 211
  • implicit meanings, 13, 217, 219, 225, 228
    • questionable, 214, 225
  • implicitness, 211, 214, 217–18, 220–24, 227
  • implicit strategies, 97, 106, 212, 215–16
  • indeterminacy, 259–60
  • indicators, 9, 10, 50, 52–54, 56–60, 64, 68, 83, 173–75, 177–82
  • inferences, 49, 59, 74, 194, 216–18, 220, 222–24
  • informal logic, 25, 30, 36, 38–39
  • information, implicit, 225, 227
  • informativity, 253
  • Institutional constraints and prototypical argumentative patterns, 117
  • institutional context, 139–40
  • institutional preconditions, 118, 190, 192
  • intended audience, 4, 64–65, 136, 143
  • interactional, 170, 184
  • interactive forms of discourse, 47

K

  • Key Word In context (KWIc), 14, 26
  • keywords
    • cultural, 11
    • statistical, 33, 35
  • Krabbe, 7
  • KWIc (Key Word In context), 14, 26

L

  • language
    • connotative, 150
    • performative, 166
    • specialised, 4
  • language variation, 3
  • language variety, 197
  • legal argumentation, 25, 36
  • legitimacy, 48, 111–16, 118–19, 122–23, 125
    • cognitive, 114
    • moral, 114
    • pragmatic, 114
  • legitimation, 111, 115–16, 126
  • legitimation discourse, public, 118
  • Levinson, 2, 52, 56, 226
  • Linking inferential schemes to context, 118
  • literary criticism, 158, 165
  • loci, 11, 111, 119, 125, 127–28, 131
  • Loci and maxims function, 119

M

  • macro levels of discourse, 4
  • macrolinguistic level, 4
  • main standpoints, declarative, 195
  • manipulation, 8, 93, 96–97, 228
    • creative, 2
  • maxim of truth, 253
  • maxims, 11, 51, 119, 127, 235, 244, 253, 255
  • metalanguage of argumentation, 36
  • metaphors, 15, 84, 88–89, 254
  • misused implicit meanings, 227
  • mode of discourse, 2
  • modes of predication, 173, 176, 178, 186
  • moral legitimacy, 114

N

  • neo-rhetorical, 25

O

  • objects of agreement, 14, 46, 49, 61, 65, 68
  • opening stage, 14, 47, 49–50, 67–68
  • Opinion article, 51, 53, 66–68
  • organizations, textual, 170–71, 184

P

  • participants, ratified, 65
  • Partington, 12
  • Passive voices, 219, 222
  • patterns
    • problem-solution, 122
    • toulmin’s argument, 32
  • Perelman, 5, 11, 67, 74–76, 85, 116, 123, 133
  • Perelman & Olbrechts-Tyteca, 36, 41, 144
  • persuasion, 1, 92–93, 96, 105, 153–61, 164, 166, 216–17, 219–21, 227, 248–50
  • persuasion and manipulation, 96
  • persuasive force, 47, 218
  • Plantin, 2, 9–10, 191, 199
  • polarity game, 257, 261
  • polarity question, 255–56, 258
  • politeness, 2, 207, 228
  • political discourse, 31, 195, 227
  • polyphony, 10, 56–57, 61, 68
  • populism, 46–48, 52, 54–56, 220, 224
  • positive bias, 93, 105
  • Postmodernism, 158
  • practical reasoning, 71, 74, 81, 83
  • pragma-dialectical approach, 1, 7, 25, 99, 133
  • pragma-dialectical classification of argument schemes, 199
  • pragma-dialectical perspective, 6
  • pragma-dialectical theory, 39, 169
  • pragma-dialectical understanding of schemes, 11
  • pragmadialectics, 8, 96, 116–18, 136
  • pragma-dialectics, 8, 13, 15, 49, 96, 134, 137, 170, 176, 189–92
  • pragmatic argumentation, 71–72, 74–76, 88, 125, 192, 195–96, 198, 200, 206
  • pragmatic problem-solving argumentation, 199
    • complex, 195
  • predications, 9, 169, 171–73, 175–76, 178, 181–82
  • premises, unstated, 12
  • presuppositions, 52, 97, 101, 106, 211, 213–16, 218–19, 255–60
  • presuppositions and implicatures, 213
  • propaganda, 216, 221
    • political, 211–12, 221
  • propositions
    • asserted, 51, 62
    • conceded, 61–62
  • prototypical argumentative patterns, 113, 117–18, 189–90, 192, 195

Q

  • question tags, 54, 56–57

R

  • readership, intended, 64, 67
  • reasonableness, 31, 57–58, 169, 184
  • reasoning, disjunctive, 74, 83
  • rebuttals, 129
  • reconstruction, 11, 100, 126–28
  • Reed, 12
  • rhetorical fallacies, 234, 242
  • rhetorical figures, 159, 193
  • rhetorical strategies, 84, 117
  • rhetorical syllogism, 96
  • Rhetoric of Fiction, 158

S

  • schemes, 2, 11, 13, 37–40, 99, 101, 119, 195
    • linking inferential, 118
  • scientific argumentation, 32, 189–90, 194, 198, 206
  • scientific discourse, 36–37, 189–90, 192, 194–96, 204, 206–7
  • Searle, 171
  • self-presentation, 160–62
  • sermons, 67
  • social context, 31, 38–39
  • speech acts, 14, 50, 169–70, 176
  • Speech Act Theory, 170
  • standpoint, 6–8, 49, 53, 62–64, 99–100, 117–19, 138–40, 178, 189–91, 196–99, 203–7
    • averred, 47
    • implicit, 141
    • positive, 129
  • standpoint statement, 198
  • starting point, accepted, 50, 58–59, 62–63
  • starting points, 7, 11, 46–54, 57–58, 60–65, 68, 120, 123, 189, 194, 205–6
    • factual, 148–49
    • procedural, 49
  • state predication, 171–73, 178
  • strategic maneuvering/ manoeuvring, 1–2, 8, 13, 31, 46, 49, 58, 96, 102,117–18, 190, 192
  • strategies
    • hedging, 150, 202
    • manipulative, 15, 92
  • strategies of legitimation, 115–16, 118–19
  • structure, cognitive, 4, 24, 29
  • style, 3–4, 17, 77, 134, 148, 172
  • subordinative argumentation, 127, 191, 194, 198, 200–201, 203, 207
  • subtypes, 124, 144, 189, 191, 195–96, 204
  • supporting arguments, 50, 64, 100, 129, 191, 196, 198, 207
  • sustainability, 111, 116, 118–22, 127, 131
  • sustainability goals, 124, 129, 131

T

  • tag questions, 52, 54–55, 57
  • terminology, classical, 193
  • terrorism, 63–64
  • text genre, 4, 13, 68, 145
  • texts
    • monologic, 14, 68
    • short, 123, 214
  • Text type, 77–81, 146
  • topical question, 253, 255–56, 258
  • topics, 83, 88, 129, 172–73, 183, 211, 215–17, 219, 222–24
  • topoi, 11–13, 119, 193
  • topos, 9–11, 101
  • Toulmin, 5–6, 36, 39, 41, 191, 193
  • transformations, 248, 256–58

V

  • vague expressions, 97, 211, 221
  • Vagueness Pragmatic, 215–16
  • values, moral, 53, 66
  • values and beliefs, 49, 67
  • van Dijk, 8, 96
  • van Eemeren, 7–10, 49–53, 57–58, 62, 113, 117–18, 137, 149–51, 169–70, 184, 190, 192, 194–95
  • van Rees, 2
  • varieties, linguistic, 198, 200
  • visual argumentation, 15, 36
  • Visual Arts, 16, 169, 171, 188

W

  • Wagemans, 190, 194–96
  • Walton, 6–7, 24, 31, 39, 40–41, 74–75, 104, 144
  • Winnicott, 163, 166
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue