Cover not available

In:Persuasion in Specialized Discourse: A multidisciplinary perspective
Edited by Chiara Degano, Dora Renna and Francesca Santulli
[Argumentation in Context 22] 2024
► pp. 248–264

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 12
Engaging conspiracy theories

Reducing the anti-persuasive effects of persuasion

 | Carnegie Mellon University
Published online: 25 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.22.12wer
Abstract
To encounter a conspiracy theory is to enter a dark world where normal rules do not apply. To reason with an upholder of that theory is to come against a force-field which intensifies at every push, rendering ordinary persuasive strategies counter-productive. In place of such strategies, I appeal to the underlying linguistic structure of moves in a language game as providing a way out from the closed system of a conspiracy theory. This approach constitutes an application of what may be called practical linguistics.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Conspiracy theories
  • 3.Accounting for conspiracy theories
  • 4. Dialogue games and conspiracy theories
  • 5.A different kind of dialogue game
  • 6.The shift from content to form
  • Notes
  • References
References (23)
References
Abad-Santos, A. (2015, February 20). Lizard people: The greatest political conspiracy ever created. Vox. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bie, S. (2020, August 26). Virgin body: What did this female soldier of the 15th century look like? Joan of Arc-Jeanne d’Arc (1412–1431). [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, L. (1983). Dialogue games. D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickey, C. (2020, October 8). How to talk to a conspiracy theorist. Medium. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Advances in Political Psychology, 40(Suppl. 1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, B., Arora, M., & Muha, B. (2021, November 24). How to talk to QAnon loved ones this Thanksgiving. Slate. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffin, D. R. (2009). The mysterious collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the final official report about 9/11 is unscientific and false. Olive Branch Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heringer, H.-J. (1976). Practical semantics. Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ingarden, R. (1973). The literary work of art. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kingdon, D. G., & Turkington, D. (1994). Cognitive-behavioral therapy of schizophrenia. The Guilford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leonard, M.-J., & Philippe, F. L. (2021). Conspiracy theories: A public health concern and how to address it. Frontiers in Psychology. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melrose, R. (1996). The margins of meaning. Rodopi B. V. ISBN: 978-90-5183-704-9Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orlowski, J. (Director). (2020). The social dilemma. netflix.com/title/81254224Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petersen, M. B., Osmundsen, M., & Tooby, J. (2020). The evolutionary psychology of conflict and the functions of falsehood. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenberg, P. (2021). A terrifying new theory: Fake news and conspiracy theories as an evolutionary strategy. Salon. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smedslund, J. (1988). Psycho-Logic. Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solzhenitsyn, A. I. (1973). The gulag archipelago. Harper & Row, Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., & Vermeule, A. (2008). Conspiracy theories. University of Chicago Law School, No. 387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2020). Conspiracy theories and the conspiracy mindset: Implications for political ideology. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 118–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. (Ed.). (2001). Crucial concepts in argumentation theory. Amsterdam University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. Lawrence, Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warzel, C. (2020, October 25). How to talk to friends and family who share conspiracy theories. New York Times. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue