In:Persuasion in Specialized Discourse: A multidisciplinary perspective
Edited by Chiara Degano, Dora Renna and Francesca Santulli
[Argumentation in Context 22] 2024
► pp. 153–168
Chapter 7Persuasion and critical-theoretical thought
Published online: 25 October 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.22.07mit
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.22.07mit
Abstract
Literary scholars have increasingly moved away from the hermeneutics of suspicion, on the ground that this
once-dominant axis of reflection uniting Nietzsche, Marx, and Freud and culminating with deconstruction and poststructuralism,
has been reduced to an ineffectual set of standardized rhetorical gestures with the sole purpose of debunking and demystifying
(R. Felski 2015; R. Felski and E. Anker 2017). In such a postcritical climate, this article explores the link between
persuasion and the pursuit of knowledge in the Humanities through three theoretically charged close readings (Jane Austen,
Michel Foucault, Eve K. Sedgwick). Discussion takes its cue from the implications of persuasion as a rhetorical tenet and goes
on to trace its transformation, first in connection with the rise of discourse, and secondly in connection with the ethical
turn in critical inquiry. Ultimately, the article suggests that the traditional tension between truth and persuasion has taken
on new life in the polarity of the cognitive and the affective dimensions of knowledge.
Article outline
- 1.Publicness (Austen and Foucault)
- 2.Persuasion and truth
- 3.Paranoid epistemology
Notes References
References (29)
Anderson, A. (2006). The
Way We Argue Now: a Study in the Cultures of
Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press. .
Arendt, H. (1998). The
Human Condition. M. Canovan (Intro.). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Aristotle. (1998). Excerpt
from Poetics
. In Richter, David H. (Ed.), The Critical Tradition:
Classic Texts and Contemporary Contexts. Bedford Books, pp. 38–64.
. (2000).
Rhetoric.
Infomotions Inc. ProQuest Ebook Central.
Barthes, Roland (1979). L’
ancienne rhétorique [Aide-mémoire]. Recherches
Rhétoriques Communications, 16, 172–223. .
Bodei, R. (1996). Dire
la verità. In M. Foucault, Discorso
e verità nella Grecia antica (R. Bodei
Intro.) (pp. vii–xix). Roma: Donzelli.
(2004). My
Life in Rhetoric. In Walter Jost and Wendyz Olmested (Eds.), A
Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical
Criticism (pp. 499–504). Blackwell Publishing.
De Man, P. (1979). Allegories
of Reading Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust. New Haven London: Yale University Press.
Eyers, T. (2017). Speculative
Formalism: Literature, Theory, and the Critical Present. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
(2005). Discourse
on Language. In David Wood, and José Medina (Eds.), Truth:
Engagements Across Philosophical
Traditions (pp. 315–333). John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth
and Method. Translation revised by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. Continuum.
Second, revised edition.
Kastley, J. L. (1997).
Rethinking
the Rhetorical Tradition: From Plato to Postmodernism. Yale University
Press. JSTOR, [URL]. Accessed
28 Aug. 2021.
Mark 4:21. Berean Study Bible. [URL].
Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud
and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation (D. Savage, Trans.). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Sedgwick, E. K. (2003). Paranoid
Reading and Reparative Reading, or You’re So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Essay is About
You. In Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Touching Feeling: Affect,
Pedagogy,
Performativity (pp. 123–151). Durham: Duke University Press.
Walker, J. (1994). The
Body of Persuasion: A Theory of the Enthymeme. College
English, 56(1), 46–65.
