Cover not available

In:Persuasion in Specialized Discourse: A multidisciplinary perspective
Edited by Chiara Degano, Dora Renna and Francesca Santulli
[Argumentation in Context 22] 2024
► pp. 1–23

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Introduction
Genres and persuasion

Linguistic and argumentation perspectives

 | University of Roma Tre
 | University of Ferrara
 | Ca’ Foscari University of Venice
Published online: 25 October 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.22.00deg
Article outline
  • 1.Variation and context: The perspective of language use
  • 2.Variation and context: The argumentation perspective
  • 3.Linguistics and argumentation
  • 4.The volume
  • Notes
  • References
References (95)
References
Aakhus, M. (2003). Neither Naïve nor normative reconstruction. Dispute mediators, impasse, and the design of argumentation. Argumentation, 17(3), 265–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Communication as Design. Communication Monographs, 74(1), pp. 112–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amossy, R. (2002). How to do things with doxa. Toward an analysis of argumentation in discourse. Poetics Today, 23(3), 465–487. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). The argumentative dimension of discourse. In F. H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Argumentation in practice (pp. 87–98). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). L’argumentation dans le discours (2nd ed.). Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Argumentation in discourse. A socio-discursive approach to arguments. Informal Logic, 29(3), 252–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amossy, R., & Koren, R. (Eds.) (2004). Argumentation et prise de position: pratiques discursives. Semen numéro special 17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antelmi, Donella (2012). Comunicazione e analisi del discorso. UTET.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antelmi, D., & Santulli, F. (2012). Arbitration awards in Italy: some argumentative features in the discourse analytical perspective”. In V.K Bhatia, G. Garzone, & C. Degano (Eds.), Arbitration Awards: Generic Features and Textual Realisations (pp. 91–108). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. Continuum. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia. V. K. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse A Genre-Based View. Continuum International.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2010). Interdiscursivity in professional communication. Discourse & Communication, 21(1), 32–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K., Garzone, G., & Degano, C. (eds) (2012). Arbitration Awards: Generic Features and Textual Realisations. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bondi, M. (2014). Integrating corpus and genre approaches: phraseology and voice across EAP genres. In M. Gotti, D. S. Giannoni (Eds.) Corpus Analysis for Descriptive and Pedagogic Purposes: English Specialised Discourse (pp. 43–62). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bondi, M., & Diani, G. (2008). Forms of metadiscourse in English academic writing: A cross-disciplinary and cross-generic analysis of meta-argumentative phraseology. In M. Bertuccelli Papi, A. Bertacca, & S. Bruti (Eds.), Threads in the Complex Fabric of Language. Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honour of Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi (pp. 69–84). Felici Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borel, M. J. (1989). Norms in argumentation and natural logic. In R. Maier (Ed.), Norms in argumentation. Proceedings of the conference on norms 1988 (pp. 33–48). Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borel, M. J., Grize, J. B., & Miéville, D. (1983). Essai de logique naturelle [A treatise on natural logic]. Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowker, J. (2021). Contesting International Trade Agreements: Argumentation Patterning in Embedded Discourses. Lingue e Linguaggi 42, 23–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Candlin, C. N. (2006). Accounting for interdiscursivity: challenges to professional expertise. In M. Gotti, & D. S. Giannoni (Eds.), New trends in specialized discourse analysis (pp. 21–45). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Candlin, C. N., & Crichton, J. (2013). Putting our trust in the learner. In J. Arnold, & T. Murphey (Eds.), Meaningful action: Earl Stevick’s influence on language teaching, (pp. 79–94). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Catenaccio, P. (2012). Understanding CSR discourse: insights from linguistics and discourse analysis. Arcipelago Edizioni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Caught between Profitability and Responsibility: Arguing Legitimacy in the Pharmaceutical Industry. In C. Ilie, & G. Garzone, (Eds) Argumentation Across Communities of Practice: Multi-disciplinary Perspectives (pp. 127–228). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degano, C. (2007). Presupposition and dissociation in discourse: a corpus study. Argumentation, 21, 361–378. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Discorsi di guerra: il prologo del conflitto iracheno nella stampa britannica e italiana. LED edizioni universitarie.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Marketing identities on Nestlé’s websites. In G. Garzone, & Catenaccio, P. (Eds.), Identities across Media and Modes: Discursive perspectives (pp. 189–213). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doury, M. (1997). Le débat immobile. L’Argumentation dans le débat médiatique sur les parasciences. Kimé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). La classification des arguments dans les discours ordinaires. Langage, 154, 59–73.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). The accusation of amalgame as a meta-argumentative refutation. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), The practice of argumentation (pp. 145–161). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, O. (1984). Le dir et le dit. Minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, O., & Anscombre, J. C. (1989). Argumentativity and Informativity. In M. Mayer (Ed.), From Metaphisics to Rhetoric (pp. 71–87). Kluwer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falco, G. (2013). The Corporate Annual Report as Genre Mixing: Making Meaning through Interdiscursivity. In Textus, English Studies in Italy, 1, 127–138.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1957/1968). Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garzone, G. (2014). Investigating Blawgs through Corpus Linguistics: Issues of Generic Integrity. In M. Gotti and D. S. Giannoni (Eds.), Corpus Analysis for Descriptive and Pedagogical Purposes: ESP Perspectives (pp. 167–188). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015) Genre Analysis. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie, & T. Sandel, (Eds) The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, (pp. 1–17). John Wiley & Sons Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). The interpreter-mediated police interview as argumentative discourse in context. A case-study. In C. Ilie, & G. Garzone (Eds), Argumentation across Communities of Practice (pp. 151–176). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garzone, G., & Santulli, F. (2004). What Can Corpus Linguistics Do for Critical Discourse Analysis? In A. Partington, J. Morley, & L. Haarman (Eds.), Corpora and Discourse (351–368). Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements of social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18(3), 213–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gollin-Kies, S., Hall, D. R., & Moore, S. H. (2015). Language for Specific Purposes. Palgrave Macmillan UK. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gotti, M. (2012). The Litigational ‘Colonisation’ of ADR Discourse. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse, 2(1), 31–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grize, J. B. (1982). De la logique à l’argumentation. Librairie Droz. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grize, J.-B. (1986). Raisonner en parlant. In M. Meyer (Ed.), De la metaphysique à la rhétorique (pp. 45–55). Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985/2003). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardt-Mautner, G. (1995). ‘Only Connect’. Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics. PhD Thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, C. (2017). Cross-disciplinary perspectives on context-specific argumentation practices. In C. Ilie, & G. Garzone (Eds.), Argumentation across Communities of Practice (1–17). Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (2006). Derailments of argumentation. It takes two to tango. In P. Houtlosser, & A. van Rees (Eds.), Considering pragma-dialectics. A festschrift for Frans H. van Eemeren on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 121–133). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lawrence, J., & Reed, C. (2020). Argument mining: A survey. Computational Linguistics. 45(4), 765–818. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzi, D. (2007). The Construction of argumentation in judicial texts: Combining a genre and a corpus perspective. Argumentation, 21, 21–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzi, D. (2010). «This argument Fails for Two reasons…»: a linguistic analysis of judicial evaluation strategies in US Supreme Court Judgments. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 23, 373–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzi, D. (2012). Analogy in History. A Corpus-Based study. In F.H van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Exploring Argumentative Contexts (pp. 115–133). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzi, D. & Bondi, M. (2009). Writing History: Argument, Narrative and Point of View. In M. Shiro, P. Bentivoglio, & F. Erlich (Eds.), Haciendo discurso. Homenaje a Adriana Bolivar (pp. 611–626). Universidad Central de Venezuela.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McBurney, P., & Parsons, S. (2001). Chance Discovery Using Dialectical Argumentation. In T. Terano, Y. Ohsawa, T. Nishida, A. Namatame, S. Tsumoto, T. Washio (Eds.) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol 2253. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mochales, R. & Ieven, A. (2009). Creating an argumentation corpus: do theories apply to real arguments? A case study on the legal argumentation of the ECHR”. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 21–30). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. (2009). Implicit dialogical premises, explanation as argument: a corpus-based reconstruction. Informal Logic, 29(1), 15–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. & Coffin, C. (2004). Checking overinterpretation and underinterpretation: Help from corpora in critical linguistics. In C. Coffin, A. Hewings, K. O’Halloran (Eds.), Applying English Grammar: Functional and Corpus Approaches (pp. 275–297). Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, A. (2003). The Linguistics of Political Argument. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, A., Morley, J., & Haarman, L. (Eds.) (2004). Corpora and Discourse. Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Presses universitaires de France.
Plantin, C. (1996). L’argumentation. Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Argumentation studies in France. A new legitimacy. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. A. Willard, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Anyone who has a view. Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation (pp. 173–187). Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plantin, Christian (2010). Les instruments de structuration des séquences argumentatives. Verbum, 32(1), 31–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Les bonnes raisons des émotions. Arguments, fallacies, affects. Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reed, Chris (2006). Preliminary results from an argument Corpus. In E. Bermúdez, & L. Miyares (Eds.), Linguistics in the Twenty-First Century (pp. 185–196). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. (2014). Argumentation Analysis and the Discourse-Historical Approach. A Methodological Framework. In C. Hart, & P. Cap (Eds.) Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 67–96). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetoric of Racism and Antisemitism. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S. (2009). Argumentation as an object of interest and as a social and cultural resource. In N. Muller-Mirza, & A. N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and education (pp. 9–66). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, E., & Greco Morasso, S. (2010). Comparing the argumentum model of topics to other contemporary approaches to argument schemes. The procedural and material components. Argumentation, 24(4), 489–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rigotti, E., & Rocci, A. (2005). From argument analysis to cultural keywords (and back again). In F. H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Argumentation in practice (pp. 125–142). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sala, M. (2008). Argumentative styles as cultural identity traits in legal studies. In D. Giannoni, & S. Maci (Eds.), Identity Traits in English Academic Discourse, Special issue of Linguistica e Filologia, 27, 93–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012), Linguistic and Textual Features of Italian Commercial arbitration awards. In V. K. Bhatia, G. Garzone, & C. Degano (Eds.), Arbitration Awards: Generic Features and Textual Realisations (pp. 152–170). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santulli, F. (2006). Strutture argomentative e scelte lessicali nel linguaggio della giurisprudenza. In E. Cresti (Ed.), Prospettive nello studio del lessico italiano, (pp. 461–469). Firenze University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). La sentenza come genere testuale: narrazione, argomentazione, performatività. In G. Garzone, & F. Santulli (Eds.), Il linguaggio giuridico. Prospettive interdisciplinari (pp. 207–238). Giuffrè.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santulli, F., & Degano, C. (2022). Agreement in Argumentation. A discursive perspective. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silver, M. (2006). Language across disciplines: Towards a critical reading of contemporary academic discourse. Universal-Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (1995). But as an indicator of counter-arguments and concessions. Leuvense Bijdragen, 84, 281–294.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stati, S. (1998). La concession: syntaxe, logique et argumentation. La linguistique 34(2), 119–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and Corpus Analysis. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tessuto, G. (2012). Investigating English Legal Genres in Academic and Professional Contexts. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. E. (1958/2003). The Uses of Arguments. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. (2006). Discourse and Manipulation. Discourse and Society, 17(3), 359–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. et al.. (2014). Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Springer Netherlands. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2007). Argumentative Indicators in Discourse: A Pragma- Dialectical Study. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Rees, A. (1995). Analysing and evaluating Problem-solving discussions. Argumentation, 9, 343–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Discourse analysis and argumentation theory: The Case of Television Talk, Journal of Pragmatics, 39: 1454–1463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, D. N., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995). Commitment in dialogue. Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. SUNY Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werlich, E. (1983). A Text Grammar of English. Quelle & Meyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Willard, C.A (1982). Argument Fields. In J. R. Cox and C. A. Willard (Eds.) Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research (pp. 24–77). Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Žagar, Igor Ž. (2007). Arguing from large corpora: some epistemological and methodological dilemmas; experimental study aimed at quantifying political argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, J. A. Blair, C. Willard, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (1553–1558). Sicsat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue