In:An Argumentative Analysis of the Emergence of Issues in Adult-Children Discussions
Rebecca G. Schär
[Argumentation in Context 19] 2021
► pp. 149–157
References
Published online: 6 April 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.19.refs
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.19.refs
Aakhus, M., Muresan, S. & Wacholder, N., & Bex, F., Grasso, F. & Green, N. (2017). An Argument-Ontology for a Response-Centered Approach to
Argumentation Mining. Proceedings of CMNA 2016, 40–40.
Alam, F. & Rosemberg, C. R. (2014). Narración y disputas entre niños. Un análisis de argumentaciones
tempranas. Cogency, 6(1), 9–31.
Andone, C. (2013). Argumentation in political interviews: Analyzing and evaluating
responses to accusations of inconsistency. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Arcidiacono, F. & Bova, A. (2015). Activity-bound and activity-unbound arguments in response to
parental eat-directives at mealtimes: Differences and similarities in
children of 3–5 and 6–9 years old. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 40–40.
Arcidiacono, F. & Pontecorvo, C. (2009). Cultural practices in Italian family conversations: Verbal
conflict between parents and adolescents. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(1), 97–117.
Arcidiacono, F., Pontecorvo, C. & Greco Morasso, S. (2009). Family conversations: The relevance of context in evaluating
argumentation. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(2), 79–92.
Arendt, B. (2015). Kindergartenkinder argumentieren – Peer-Gespräche als
Erwerbskontext. Themenheft in Den Mitteilungen Des Deutschen
Germanistenverbandes, 62(1), 21–33.
(2017). Kindergartenkinder argumentieren über Besitz, eine Analyse
kindertypischer Plausibilitätsstandards auf topischer Basis. In Meissner, I. & Wyss, E. L., Begründen – Erklären – Argumentieren, Konzepte und Modellierungen in der
Angewandten Linguistik (pp. 47–64). Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
Arendt, B., Heller, V. & Krah, A. (Ed.). (2015). Kinder argumentieren. Interaktive Erwerbskontexte und
-mechanismen. Themenheft in Den Mitteilungen Des Deutschen
Germanistenverbandes, 62(1).
Baker, M. J. (2015). The integration of pragma-dialectics and collaborative learning
research: Dialogue, externalisation and collective thinking. In van Eemeren, F. H. & Garssen, B. (Ed.), Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice (pp. 175–199). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Barth, E. M. & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1982). From axiom to dialogue: A philosophical study of logics and
argumentation. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Baumtrog, M. D. (2018). Reasoning and Arguing, Dialectically and Dialogically, Among
Individual and Multiple Participants. Argumentation, 32(1), 77–98.
Bose, I. & Hannken-Illjes, K. (2016). Wie Vorschulkinder Geltung etablieren. Acta Universitatis Wratslaviensis Studia Linguistica, XXXV(3742), 119–136.
Bova, A. (2015a). Children’s responses in argumentative discussions relating to
parental rules and prescriptions. Ampersand, 2, 109–109.
(2015b). Adult as a source of expert opinion in child’s argumentation
during family mealtime conversations. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 4(1), 4–20.
Bova, A. & Arcidiacono, F. (2013a). Invoking the authority of feelings as a strategic maneuver in
family mealtime conversations. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 23(3), 206–224.
(2013b). Investigating children’s Why-questions: A study comparing
argumentative and explanatory function. Discourse Studies, 15(6), 713–734.
(2014). “You must eat the salad because it is nutritious”. Argumentative
strategies adopted by parents and children in food-related discussions at
mealtimes. Appetite, 73, 81–81.
(2015). Beyond Conflicts: Origin and Types of Issues Leading to
Argumentative Discussions during Family Mealtimes. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(2), 263–288.
(2018). Interplay between parental argumentative strategies, children’s
reactions, and topics of disagreement during mealtime
conversations. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 19, 124–124.
Christopher, S. (2015). I flussi comunicativi in un contesto istituzionale universitario
plurilingue. Bellinzona: Osservatorio Linguistico della Svizzera Italiana.
Cigada, S. (2016). Analyzing emotions in French discourse: (Manipulative?)
shortcuts. In Danesi, M. & Greco, S. (Ed.), Case studies in discourse analysis (pp. 390–409). Munich: Lincom Europa.
(2017). La sensibilità come pratica condivisa della
ragione. In Nanni, P., Rigotti, E. & Wolfsgruber, C., Argomentare per un rapporto ragionevole con la realtà, strumenti per la
scuola di argomentazione (pp. 71–87). Milano: Fondazione per la Sussidiarietà.
Craig, R. T. (2000). “The issue” as a metadiscursive object in some student-led
classroom discussions. In Hollihan, T. A. (Ed.), Argument at century’s end: Reflecting on the past and envisioning the
future (pp. 64–73). Annandale, VA: National Communication Association.
Craig, R. T. & Tracy, K. (2005). “The issue” in argumentation practice and theory. In van Eemeren, F. H. & Houtlosser, P. (Ed.), Argumentation in Practice (pp. 11–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Crowell, A. & Kuhn, D. (2014). Developing dialogic argumentation skills: A 3-year intervention
study. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(2), 363–381.
Danish, J. A. & Enyedy, N. (2015). Latour goes to kindergarten: Children marshalling allies in a
spontaneous argument about what counts as science. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 5, 5–5.
Dunn, J. & Munn, P. (1987). Development of justification in disputes with mother and
sibling. Developmental Psychology, 23(6), 791–798.
van Eemeren, F. H. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B. & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer.
van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B. & Meuffels, B. (2009). Fallacies and judgment of reasonableness, empirical research concerning
the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. New York: Springer.
van Eemeren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht / Cinnaminson: Foris.
(1992). Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies, A Pragma-Dialectical
Perspective. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical
Account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S. & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tocaloosa / London: The University of Alabama Press.
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory. A handbook of historical
background and contemporary developments. Mahwah, N. J., London: Erlbaum.
van Eemeren, F. H. & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2017). Argumentation: Analysis and evaluation. New York: Routledge.
Fasulo, A. & Pontecorvo, C. (1994). “Sì, ma questa volta abbiamo detto la verità”. Le strategie
argomentative dei bambini nelle dispute familiari. Rassegna Di Psicologia, 3(XI), 83–101.
Felton, M. & Kuhn, D. (2001). The Development of Argumentative Discourse Skill. Discourse Processes, 32(2 & 3), 135–153.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case study. In Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Ed.), The Sage handbook for qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 301–316). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Freeley, A. J. & Steinberg, D. L. (2009). Argumentation and debate, critical thinking for reasoned decision
making (12th international student ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Golder, C. (1996a). La production de discours argumentatifs: Revue de
questions. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 116(1), 119–134.
Goodwin, J. (2002). Designing issues. In van Eemeren, F. H. & Houtlosser, P. (Ed.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation
analysis (pp. 81–96). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Greco Morasso, S. (2011). Argumentation in Dispute Mediation: A reasonable way to handle
conflict. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Greco Morasso, S., Miserez-Caperos, C. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2015). L’argumentation à visée cognitive chez les enfants. Une étude
exploratoire sur les dynamiques argumentatives et
psychosociales. In Muller Mirza, N. & Buty, C. (Ed.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp. 39–82). Bern: Peter Lang.
Greco, S., Convertini, J., Perret-Clermont, A.-N. & Iannaccone, A. (2019). (Un)expected arguments? An analysis of children’s contributions to
argumentative discussions in contexts pre-designed by adults. European Conference on Argumentation ECA, Groningen.
Greco, S., Mehmeti, T. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2017). Do adult-children dialogical interactions leave space for a full
development of argumentation? A case study. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 6(2), 193–219.
Greco, S., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Iannaccone, A., Rocci, A., Convertini, J. & Schär, R. (2018). The Analysis of Implicit Premises within Children’s Argumentative
Inferences. Informal Logic, 38(1), 438–470.
Greco, S., Schär, R., Perret-Clermont, A.-N. & Iannaccone, A. (2017). Argumentation as a dialogic interaction in everyday talk: Adults and
children “playing by the rules” in board game play. International Association for Dialogue Analysis IADA, Bologna.
Greco, S., Schär, R., Pollaroli, C. & Mercuri, C. (2018). Adding a temporal dimension to the analysis of argumentative
discourse: Justified reframing as a means of turning a single-issue
discussion into complex argumentative discussions. Discourse Studies, 20(6), 726–742.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Grossen, M. (2001). La notion de contexte: Quelle définition pour quelle psychologie?
Un essai de mise au point. In Bernié, J.-P. (Ed.), Apprentissage, développement et significations. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.
Grossen, M., & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1992). L’espace thérapeutique. Cadres et contextes. Paris & Neuchâtel: Delachaux & Niestlé.
Hauser, S. & Luginbühl, M. (2015). Aushandlung von Angemessenheit in Entscheidungsdiskussionen von
Schulkindern. Aptum, Zeitschrift Für Sprachkritik Und Sprachkultur, 11(2), 180–189.
Heller, V. (2012). Kommunikative Erfahrungen von Kinder in Familie und Unterricht,
Passungen und Divergenzen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
Heller, V. & Krah, A. (2015). Wie Eltern und Kinder argumentieren. Interaktionsmuster und ihr erwerbssupportives Potenzial im längsschnittlichen Vergleich. Themenheft in Den Mitteilungen Des Deutschen Germanistenverbandes, 62(1), 5–20.
Henderson, J. (Ed.), Freese, J. H. (Trans.). (1926). Aristotle The “Art” of Rhetoric. Cambridge MA, London UK: Harvard University Press.
Herman, T. (2014). L’argument d’autorité: Sa structure et ses effets. In Herman, T. & Oswald, S. (Ed.), Rhétorique et Cognition / Rhetoric and Cognition (pp. 153–183). Bern: Peter Lang.
Jackson, S. (1986). Building a case for claims about discourse
structure. In Ellis, D. G. & Donohue, W. A. (Ed.), Contemporary issues in language and discourse processes (pp. 129–147). Hillsdale, N. J., London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(1987). Rational and Pragmatic Aspects of Argument. In van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Blair, J. A. & Willard, C. A. (Ed.), Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline, Proceedings of the
Conference on Argumentation 1986 (pp. 217–227). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Jackson, S. & Jacobs, S. (1980). Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the
enthymeme. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66, 251–251.
Jacobs, S. (1986). How to make an argument from example in discourse
analysis. In Ellis, D. G. & Donohue, W. A. (Ed.), Contemporary issues in language and discourse processes (pp. 149–167). Hillsdale, N. J., London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jacobs, S. & Jackson, S. (1981). Argument as a natural category: The routine grounds for arguing
in conversation. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45, 118–118.
(1982). Conversational argument. A discourse analytic
approach. In Cox, J. R. & Willard, C. A., Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp. 205–237). Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Jacquin, J. (2014). Débattre, l’argumentation et l’identité au cœur d’une pratique
verbale. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Kalyan-Masih, V. (1973). Cognitive egocentricity of the child within Piagetian
developmental theory. Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and Affiliated
Societies, 379, 35–35.
Kuhn, D. & Udell, W. (2003). The Development of Argument Skills. Child Development, 74(5), 1245–1260.
Levinson, S. C. (1992). Activity types and language. In Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (Ed.), Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings (1979th ed., pp. 66–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lombardi, E., Greco, S., Massaro, D., Schär, R., Manzi, F., Iannaccone, A., Perret-Clermont, A.-N. & Marchetti, A. (2018). Does a good argument make a good answer? Argumentative
reconstruction of children’s justifications in a second order false belief
task. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 18, 13–13.
Matthews, J. W. & Singh R. (2015). Positioning in groups: A new development in systemic
consultation. Educational Psychology in Practice, 31(2), 150–158.
Migdalek, M. J., Rosemberg, C. R. & Arrúe, J. E. (2015). Argumentación infantil en situaciones de juego: Diferencias en
función del contexto. Propuesta Educativa, 24(44), 79–88.
Migdalek, M. J., Rosemberg, C. R. & Santibáñez Yáñez, C. (2014). La génesis de la argumentación. Un estudio con niños de 3 a 5
años en distintos contextos de juego. Ikala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 19(3), 251–267.
Migdalek, M. J., Santibáñez Yáñez, C. & Rosemberg, C. R. (2014). Estrategias argumentativas en niños pequeños: Un estudio a partir
de las disputas durante el juego en contextos escolares. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 47(86), 435–462.
Mohammed, D. (2010). Responding to criticism with accusations of inconsistency in
Prime Minister’s Question Time. Controversia, 7(1), 57–73.
(2018). Argumentation in Prime Minister’s Question Time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Muller Mirza, N. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2009). Argumentation and education, theoretical foundations and
practices. New York, NY: Springer.
Muller Mirza, N., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Tartas, V. & Iannaccone, A. (2009). Psychosocial processes in argumentation. In Muller Mirza, N. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (Ed.), Argumentation and education (pp. 67–90). New York, NY: Springer.
Murphy, J. J., Katula, R. R. & Hoppmann, M. (2014). A synoptic history of classical rhetoric (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Nonnon, E. (1996). Activités argumentatives et élaboration de connaissances
nouvelles: Le dialogue comme espace d’exploration. Langue Française, 112(1), 67–87.
(2015). Préface. L’argumentation dans les contextes de
l’éducation. In Muller Mirza, N. & Buty, C. (Ed.), L’argumentation dans les contextes de l’éducation (pp. 1–11). Bern: Peter Lang.
Palmieri, R. (2014). Corporate argumentation in takeover bids. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Palmieri, R., Rocci, A. & Kudrautsava, N. (2015). Argumentation in earnings conference calls. Corporate standpoints
and analysts’ challenges. Studies in Communication Sciences, 15(1), 120–132.
Perelman, C. & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. Bruxelles: Ed. de l’ Université de Bruxelles.
Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1979). La construction de l’intelligence dans l’interaction sociale. Bern: Peter Lang.
(2001). Psychologie sociale de la construction de l’espace de
pensée. Actes Du Colloque. Constructivisme: Usages et Perspectives En
Éducation, I, I–65.
(2015). The Architecture of Social Relationships and Thinking Spaces for
Growth. In C. Psaltis, A. Gillespie & A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Ed.), Social Relations in Human and Societal Development (pp. 51–70). Basingstokes (Hampshire, UK): Palgrave MacMillan.
Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Arcidiacono, F., Breux, S., Greco, S. & Miserez-Caperos, C. (2015). Knowledge-oriented argumentation in children. In van Eemeren, F. H. & Garssen, B. (Ed.), Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice (pp. 135–149). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Breux, S., Greco Morasso, S. & Miserez-Caperos, C. (2014). Children and knowledge-oriented argumentation. Some notes for
future research. In Gobber, G. & Rocci, A. (Ed.), Language, reason and education, Studies in honor of Eddo
Rigotti (pp. 259–277). Bern: Peter Lang.
Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Schär, R., Greco, S., Convertini, J., Iannaccone, A. & Rocci, A., (2019). Shifting from a monological to a dialogical perspective on
children’s argumentation. In van Eemeren, F. H. & Garssen, B. (Ed.), Argumentation in Actual Practice. Topical studies about argumentative
discourse in context (pp. 259–277). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(1926/1959). The language and thought of the child (3rd ed.). London / New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul (originally published in 1926).
(1926/1972). La représentation du monde chez l’enfant (4th ed.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
(originally published in 1926).
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1966). La psychologie de l’enfant et de l’adolescent. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Piaget, J. & Szeminska, A. (1941). La genèse du nombre chez l’enfant. Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Plantin, C. (1996). Le trilogue argumentatif. Présentation de modèle, analyse de
cas. Langue Française, 112, 9–9.
Pontecorvo, C. & Arcidiacono, F. (2010). Development of reasoning through arguing in young
children. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 4, 19–19.
Pontecorvo, C. & Maroni, B. (2004). Discorso e sviluppo: La conversazione in famiglia come sistema di
azione e strumento di ricerca sulla socializzazione. In Ligorio, B. (Ed.), Psicologie e cultura. Contesti, identità ed interventi (pp. 205–219). Rome: Edizione Carlo Amore-Firera Publishing Group.
Pramling, N. & Säljö, R. (2015). The clinical interview: The child as a partner in conversation
vs. The child as an object of research. In Robson, S. & Flannery Quinn, S. (Ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Young Children’s Thinking and
Understanding (pp. 87–95). Oxon: Routledge.
Rapanta, C. & Macagno, F. (2016). Argumentation methods in educational contexts: Introduction to
the special issue. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 142–142.
Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M. & Gilabert, S. (2013). What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review
of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 483–520.
van Rees, A. (1992). The use of language in conversation. An introduction to research in
conversational analysis. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Rigotti, E. (2006). Relevance of context-bound loci to Topical Potential in the
Argumentation Stage. Argumentation, 20(4), 519–540.
(2009). Whether and how classical topics can be revived within
contemporary argumentation theory. In van Eemeren, F. H. & Garssen, B. (Ed.), Pondering on problems of argumentation (pp. 157–178). Dordrecht: Springer.
Rigotti, E. & Cigada, S. (2013). La comunicazione verbale (2nd ed.). Santarcangelo di Romagna: Apogeo.
Rigotti, E. & Greco Morasso, S. (2009a). Argumentation as an object of interest and as a social and
cultural resource. In Muller Mirza, N. & Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (Ed.), Argumentation and education (pp. 1–61). New York, NY: Springer.
(2009b). Guest Editors’ Introduction: Argumentative processes and
communication contexts. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(2), 5–18.
(2010). Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary
Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material
Components. Argumentation, 24(4), 489–512.
Rigotti, E. & Greco, S. (2019). Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-Based Approach to Argument
Schemes. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Rigotti, E. & Rocci, A. (2006). Towards a definition of communication context. Studies in Communication Sciences, 6(2), 155–180.
Rocci, A. (2009). Manoeuvring with voices: The polyphonic framing of arguments in
an institutional advertisement. In van Eemeren, F. H. (Ed.), Examining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen studies on strategic
maneuvering (pp. 257–283). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Rocci, A., Greco, S., Schär, R., Convertini, J., Perret-Clermont, A.-N. & Iannaccone, A. (2018). The significance of the adversative connectives “aber”, “mais”, “ma”
(but) as indicators in young children’s argumentation. Argumentation and Language, Lugano.
Rocci, A., Greco, S., Schär, R., Convertini, J., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Iannaccone, A. (2020). The significance of the adversative connectives aber, mais, ma
(‘but’) as indicators in young children’s argumentation. Argumentation and Meaning, Journal of Argumentation in Context, 9(1), 69–94.
Rosemberg, C. R., Menti, A., Stein, A., Alam, F. & Migdalek, M. (2016). Vocabulario, narración y argumentación en los primeros años de la
infancia y la niñez. Una revisión de investigaciones. Revista Costarricense de Psicologia, 35(2), 101–120.
Ross, W. D. (Ed.). (1958). Aristotle Topica et Sophistici Elenchi (Ross, W.
D., Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Säljö, R. (1991). Piagetian controversies, Cognitive competence, and assumptions
about human communication. Educational Psychology Review, 3(2), 117–126.
Schär, R. (2017a). Definitional arguments in children’s speech. L’Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria, XXV(1), 173–192.
Schär, R. G. (2017b). On the negotiation of the issue in adult-children discussions. European Conference on Argumentation, Fribourg.
Schär, R. (2018a). On the negotiation of issues in discussions among small children
and their parents. TRANEL (Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique), 68, 17–17.
Schär, R. G. (2018b). An argumentative analysis of the emergence of issues in adult-children
discussions [PhD Dissertation]. Università della Svizzera italiana.
Schär, R. & Greco, S. (2018). The emergence of issues in everyday discussions between adults
and children. International Journal of Semiotics and Visual Rhetoric, 2(1), 29–43.
Schär, R. G. & Greco, S. (2016). The emergence of issues in everyday discussions between adults and
children. Earli SIG 26, Gent, Belgium.
Schoultz, J., Säljö, R. & Wyndhamn, J. (2000). Heavenly talk: Discourse, Artifacts and Children’s Understanding
of Elementary Astronomy. Human Development, 44(2–3), 103–118.
Schwarz, B. B. & Baker, M. J. (2017). Dialogue, Argumentation and Education: History, Theory and
Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schweizerische Konferenz der kantonalen Erziehungsdirektoren
EDK. (n.d.). The swiss education system. Retrieved March 11, 2017, from [URL]
Searle, J. R. (1992). Conversation. In Searle, J. R., Parret, J. & Verschueren, J. (Ed.), (On) Searle on conversation (pp. 7–30). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Stein, N. R. & Bernas, R. (1999). The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and
skill. In Andriessen, J. & Coirier, P. (Ed.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 97–116). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Stein, N. R. & Miller, C. A. (1993). A theory of argumentative understanding: Relationships among
position preference, judgments of goodness, memory and
reasoning. Argumentation, 7(2), 183–204.
Stein, N. R. & Trabasso, T. (1982). Children’s understanding of stories: A basis for moral judgment
and dilemma resolution. In Brainerd, C. & Pressley, M. (Ed.), Verbal processes in children (pp. 161–188). New York: Springer.
Stump, E. (Ed.). (1978). Boethius’s “De topicis differentiis.” Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Tredennick, H. & Forster, E. S. (Ed.). (1960). Aristotle Posterior Analytics and Topica (Tredennick, H. & Forster, E. S., Trans.). Cambridge MA, London UK: Harvard University Press.
Völzing, P.-L. (1982). Kinder argumentieren. Die Ontogenese argumentativer Fähigkeiten. Paderborn: Schöningh.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1933). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Marxists Internet Archive. [URL]
Walton, D. (1997). Appeal to expert opinion. Arguments from authority. University Park: The University of Pennsylvania Press.
(1998). The new dialectic, conversational contexts of argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Walton, D. N. & Krabbe, E. C. (1995). Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal
Reasoning. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Zampa, M. (2017). Argumentation in the newsroom. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.