Cover not available

In:An Argumentative Analysis of the Emergence of Issues in Adult-Children Discussions
Rebecca G. Schär
[Argumentation in Context 19] 2021
► pp. 1–7

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Young children as rational interlocutors

A perspective on family argumentation

 | USI - Università della Svizzera italiana
Published online: 6 April 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.19.c00
Article outline
  • Understanding young children’s argumentation: An introduction by means of an anecdote
  • Some notes for future research
    • Advances in contextualized argumentation
    • The opening of argumentative issues
  • Notes
  • References
References (26)
References
Baumtrog, M. (2018). Navigating a necessary inequality: Children and knowledge-based injustice. Alternative Routes: A Journal of Critical Social Research, 29, 294–294.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bose, I., and Hannken-Illjes, K. (2016). Wie Vorschulkinder Geltung etablieren. Acta Universitatis Wratslaviensis Studia Linguistica, XXXV(3742), 119–136.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bova, A. (2019). The functions of parent-child argumentation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bova, A., and Arcidiacono, F. (2013). Investigating children’s why-questions: A study comparing argumentative and explanatory functions. Discourse Studies, 15(6), 713–734.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cigada, S. (2000). Nomi e cose: Aspetti semantici e pragmatici delle strutture nominali. Milan: Educatt, available at: [URL] (last visited: October 2020).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Convertini, J. (2020). An interdisciplinary approach to investigate preschool children’s implicit inferential reasoning in scientific activities. Research in Science Education, .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H., van, and Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2017). Argumentation: Analysis and evaluation (second edition). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fasulo, A. & Pontecorvo, C. (1994). “Sì, ma questa volta abbiamo detto la verità”. Le strategie argomentative dei bambini nelle dispute familiari. Rassegna Di Psicologia, 3(XI), 83–101.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, J. (2002). Designing issues. In van Eemeren, F. H. and Houtlosser, P. (Ed.), Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 81–96). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greco, S. (2018). Designing dialogue: Argumentation as conflict management in social interaction. Tranel – Travaux Neuchâtelois de Linguistique, 68, 7–7.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greco, S., Mehmeti, T., and Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2017). Do adult-children dialogical interactions leave space for a full development of argumentation? A case study. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 6(2), 193–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greco, S., Perret-Clermont, A. N., Iannaccone, A., Rocci, A., Convertini, J., and Schär, R. (2018). The analysis of implicit premises within children’s argumentative inferences. Informal Logic, 38(4), 438–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hauser, S. & Luginbühl, M. (2015). Aushandlung von Angemessenheit in Entscheidungsdiskussionen von Schulkindern. Aptum, Zeitschrift Für Sprachkritik Und Sprachkultur, 11(2), 180–189.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iannaccone, A., Perret-Clermont, A.-N., and Convertini, J. (2019). Children as investigators of Brunerian “possible worlds”. The role of narrative scenarios in children’s argumentative thinking. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 53(4), 679–693. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, S. (2015). Design thinking in argumentation theory and practice. Argumentation, 29(3), 243–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Reason-giving and the natural normativity of argumentation. Topoi, 38, 631–643. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, S., and Jackson, S. (1981). Argument as a natural category: The routine grounds for arguing in conversation. The Western journal of Speech Communication, 45, 118–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewinski, M., & Mohammed, M. (2016). Argumentation theory. In K. B. Jensen & R. T. Craig (Editors-in-Chief), J. D. Pooley & E. W. Rothenbuhler (Associate Editors). The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy (pp. 1–15). Hoboken, New Jersey: JohnWiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Migdalek, M. J., Santibáñez Yáñez, C. and Rosemberg, C. R. (2014). Estrategias argumentativas en niños pequeños: Un estudio a partir de las disputas durante el juego en contextos escolares. Revista Signos. Estudios de Lingüística, 47(86), 435–462. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muller Mirza, N., and Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2009). Argumentation and education, theoretical foundations and practices. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (2015). The architecture of social relationships and thinking spaces for growth. In C. Psaltis, A. Gillespie, and A.-N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.). Social relations in human and societal development (pp. 51–70). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Schär, R., Greco, S., Convertini, J., Iannaccone, A., and Rocci, A. (2019). Shifting from a monological to a dialogical perspective on children’s argumentation: Lessons learned. In F. H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen (Eds.), Argumentation in actual practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context (pp. 211–236). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pontecorvo, C., and Arcidiacono, F. (2007). Famiglie all’italiana: Parlare a tavola. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., and Gilabert, S. (2015). What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 483–520. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Resnick, L. B., and Schantz, F. (2015). Re-thinking intelligence: Schools that build the mind. European Journal of Education 50(3), 341–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarz, B. B., and Baker, M. J. (2017). Dialogue, Argumentation and Education: History, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue