In:The Quest for Argumentative Equivalence: Argumentative patterns in political interpreting contexts
Emanuele Brambilla
[Argumentation in Context 18] 2020
► pp. 237–238
Index
Published online: 17 February 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.18.ind
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.18.ind
A
- Analogy argument (ation) 71–74, 111, 114, 116, 139–141, 151–152, 194, 198
- Anecdotal argument 84–94, 98–103, 129, 202
- Anecdote see anecdotal argument
- Anticipation 5, 22, 61–62, 86, 93–94, 121–122, 128, 166
- Argumentation from values 77–83, 85, 87, 103, 105–106, 119, 137, 145, 149–157, 198
- Argument(ation) scheme 58–63, 66, 85, 127, 165, 197–198, 201
- Argumentative competence 40–41, 61, 202
- Argumentative equivalence 2–4, 40–41, 83–84, 195, 200, 202
- Argumentative indicator 63, 90
- Argumentum ad hominem 165–166
- Audience demand 22, 25, 59n40, 182–183, 200
- Authority argument(ation) 133
C
- Change of state verb 33, 107
- Complex problem-solving argumentation pattern 66–67, 179, 197–198, 201
- Compression 33, 98–99, 164
- Concession see concessive
- Concessive 126, 201–202
- Condensation see compression
- Conference interpreting 10–12, 18n15, 20, 23–25
- Consecutive interpreting 4n3, 10, 12–13, 63
- Context 2n1, 3, 5–7, 11, 13–14, 21–30, 33–34, 39, 41, 49, 54–58, 61–63, 67, 70, 103, 105, 108, 111–112, 116, 121–125, 137–138, 141, 157, 166, 191, 193, 198–201
- Contra-argument(ation) 151
- Corpus-based Interpreting Studies 4n2, 51–52, 57n39
- Corpus linguistics 57–59
- “Crisis as an opportunity” theme 64–65, 111, 140, 198
- Crisis discourse 1, 45, 63–67, 111, 121, 198
D
- Décalage 99, 102, 130–131, 162–163, 195
- Demonstrative 160, 168
- Dialogue interpreting 11–12
- Documentary interpreting 23–25
E
- Enthymemic argument(ation) 60, 101
- Existential presupposition 66, 71, 83, 143, 151, 156, 173, 201
F
- False start 195
G
- Genre 6, 88–89, 95, 137
H
- Homogeneity 48, 53–54
I
- Implicature 34, 107–108
- Implicitness 32–34, 59–60, 157, 198
- Implicit argument(ation) see implicitness
- Instrumental interpreting 23–24
- Interpreter training 6, 20, 61, 202–203
- Interpreting research see Interpreting Studies
- Interpreting strategy 3, 4n3, 10, 30, 33, 38n25, 41n27, 63, 99–102, 130–132, 134, 163–164, 168, 176, 195–196, 202
- Interpreting Studies 4–7, 9–13, 20–21, 23n17, 35, 41, 51–52, 61–63, 85, 166, 201–202
K
- Knowledge 21, 26, 34, 122
- see also peace agreement 3–4, 5n3, 6, 11, 14, 16, 18–22, 26, 28–29, 37, 44, 61–62, 122, 186, 201–203
- Knowledge-based strategy 38n25, 92
L
- Linearity 3, 200
M
- Media interpreting 23–24
- Modal 91, 134–135
- Monologue interpreting 11–12, 54, 59n40
N
- Narrative see anecdotal argument
- see also narrative analysis 94–98
- Normative qualification 66, 71, 83, 109, 141, 156, 173, 182, 190, 201
O
- Omission 16–18, 33–34, 37–38, 70, 84–85, 102, 164
P
- Parallel formulation 29, 36, 128
- Political argument(ation) 1–2, 5–7, 12–13, 19, 22–26, 28–30, 32–34, 36–41, 48, 54, 58, 61, 66–67, 98, 158, 166, 180, 197–203
- Political communication 1, 6, 11, 13–15, 22–24, 25, 30, 36, 45, 49, 52, 59n40, 64, 67, 84, 88
- Political discourse see political communication
- Political interpreting 2–3, 9–41, 43
- Political speech see political communication
- Political terminology 18–19
- Political text see political communication
- Pragma-dialectics 1, 5, 40–41, 58–59, 84, 98, 182, 197, 201
- Pragmatic argument(ation) 5, 58–59, 66, 109, 126–127, 156–158, 197
- Pragmatic dark 34–38, 41, 200
- Pragmatic quality 39, 139
- Presentational choice see presentational device
- Presentational coherence 40, 200
- Presentational device 30–31, 34, 40, 124, 141, 144, 147, 157, 164, 171, 173, 179, 182, 184, 199
- Prototypical argumentative pattern 5, 58–59, 61, 67, 179, 197, 199, 201
R
- Reformulation 33, 94, 98–102, 130–131, 162–164, 168, 202
- Respect for audience demands 40, 200
- Rhetoric 3, 6, 13, 25, 31, 34, 50n36, 62, 64–65, 77, 99, 121, 134–135, 142, 154, 160–163, 166–168, 171, 190, 201–202
S
- Simultaneous interpreting 2–3, 4n3, 10, 12, 20, 30, 33, 63, 200
- Skill-based strategy 38n25, 70, 101–102, 122
- Slippery slope argument(ation) 127–131, 162, 202
- Split illocution 22, 25, 117, 122–126
- Stereotypical argumentative pattern 59, 61, 109, 141, 197–198, 201
- Storytelling see anecdotal argument
- Strategic manoeuvring 2–3, 13, 21–22, 25, 30, 34, 39–41, 43, 85, 98, 182, 197–203
- Straw man argument(ation) 36–38, 62, 132, 159–160, 199, 201–202
- Symptomatic argument(ation) 114, 151, 179, 191, 194, 198
T
- Television interpreting 12n8, 18n15, 23–25, 30
- Topical coherence 19, 40, 200
- Topical potential 13–16, 18, 21, 54, 116, 166, 173, 179, 182
- Topical selection see topical potential
- Topos of history 73, 111, 140, 169, 198
- Topos of the irreparable 74, 144, 197–198
- Topos of threat 65
- Topos of urgency 67, 190, 199
- Transcription 16n14, 51–52, 200
- TV interpreting see television interpreting
U
- Unexpressed argument(ation) see implicitness
V
- Value see argumentation from values
