In:Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 17] 2019
► pp. v–viii
Get fulltext
This article is available free of charge.
Published online: 23 September 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.toc
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.toc
Table of contents
List of contributors
ix
Chapter 1.A collection of studies of argumentation in practice
1
Frans H. van Eemeren
Bart Garssen
Chapter 2.Analyzing versus interpreting argumentation: A clear-cut opposition or two poles on a continuous line?
13
Marianne Doury
Chapter 3.Television dispositives and the enactment of advocacy arguments
33
Irina Diana Mădroane
Chapter 4.Dissociation as strategic maneuvering in spokespersons’ argumentative replies at Chinese diplomatic press conferences
61
Peng Wu
Chapter 5.Re-visiting Richard Nixon’s “Checkers” speech: Why argumentation critics need an audience-centered principle of rhetorical
charity
85
Scott Jacobs
Chapter 6.Strategic ambiguity as an argumentative resource: The case of Lyndon Johnson, 50 years later
103
David Zarefsky
Chapter 7.Argument and ultimate definition in Donald Trump’s worldview
117
Robert C. Rowland
Chapter 8.
Understanding abusive argumentum ad hominem through rhetorical
context: Donald Trump’s ad hominem in the 2016 Presidential Campaign
137
Sara A. Mehltretter Drury
Dale A. Herbeck
Chapter 9.Radically reframing the climate debate: The rhetorical strategies of The Hartwell Paper
157
Jean Goodwin
Chapter 10.Prototypical argumentative patterns in activist discourse: The case of the Greenpeace Detox Campaign
173
Emanuele Brambilla
Chapter 11.“Argumentexturing”: A framework for integrating theories of argumentation and learning
195
Michael J. Baker
Baruch B. Schwarz
Chapter 12.Shifting from a monological to a dialogical perspective on children’s argumentation: Lessons learned
211
Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont
Rebecca Schär
Sara Greco
Josephine Convertini
Antonio Iannaccone
Andrea Rocci
Chapter 13.Characteristics of argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer: An observational
content analysis
237
Aranka Akkermans
Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
Nanon H. M. Labrie
Inge Henselmans
Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven
Chapter 14.Interpretative legal argumentation and the Rule of Law as the Rule of Reasons
267
Harm Kloosterhuis
Carel Smith
Chapter 15.Protection stories: A case of military propaganda?
281
Ola Bøe-Hansen
Tone Kvernbekk
Chapter 16.
On philosophical argumentation: Towards a pragma-dialectical solution of a
puzzle
299
Fernando Leal
Chapter 17.And then you are left holding the baby! Strategic manoeuvring with the argumentum ad consequentiam
321
Frans H. van Eemeren
Bart Garssen
Index
335
