In:Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 17] 2019
► pp. 85–102
Chapter 5Re-visiting Richard Nixon’s “Checkers” speech
Why argumentation critics need an audience-centered principle of rhetorical charity
Published online: 23 September 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.05jac
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.05jac
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background of the speech
- 3.The speech achieved overwhelming success
- 4.The speech overcame impossible difficulties
- 5.But was the speech reasonable?
- 6.Checkers reconsidered
- 7.Conclusion
References
References (25)
Baskerville, B. (1952). The Nixon affair. In F. W. Haberman (Ed.), The election of 1952: A symposium. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 38, 406–408.
Condit, C. M. (1989). Nixon’s “Fund”: Time as ideological resource in the “Checkers” speech. In M. C. Leff, & F. J. Kauffeld (Eds.), Texts in contexts: Critical dialogues on significant episodes in American political rhetoric (pp. 219–242). Davis, CA: Hermagoras.
Davies, L. E. (1952, Sept. 19). Vice presidential nominee says ‘crooks’ attack him; he also delays his train on coast to reply to query on $16,000 aid. Nixon declares he is ‘smeared’ by ‘communists’ on $16,000 fund. New York Times, p. 1.
Excerpts from editorial comment on Nixon special expense fund. (1952, Sept. 21). New York Times, p. 78.
Farrell, T. B. (1989) The carnival as confessional: Re-reading the figurative dimension in Nixon’s ‘Checkers’ speech. In M. C. Leff, & F. J. Kauffeld (Eds.), Texts in contexts: Critical dialogues on significant episodes in American political rhetoric (pp. 243–252). Davis, CA: Hermagoras.
Jacobs, S. (2002). Messages, functional contexts, and categories of fallacy: Some dialectical and rhetorical considerations. In F. H. van Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Dialectic and rhetoric. The warp and woof of argumentation analysis (pp. 119–130). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
(2009). Nonfallacious rhetorical design in argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering on problems of argumentation. Twenty essays on theoretical issues (pp. 55–78). Dordrecht: Springer.
Jamieson, K. H. (1996). Packaging the presidency A history and criticism of presidential campaign advertising (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Katcher, L. (1952, Sept. 18). Secret rich men’s trust fund keeps Nixon in style far beyond his salary. New York Post, pp. 3, 26.
Mattson, K. (2012). Just plain Dick. Richard Nixon’s Checkers speech and the “rocking, socking” election of 1952. New York: Bloomsbury.
Nation’s press divided on Nixon; disapproval expressed by 2 to 1. (1952, Sept. 21). New York Times, p. 1.
Nixon, R. M. (1952, September 23). Richard Nixon’s “Checkers” speech. [Video]. YouTube. Posted by Miller Center of Public Affairs. University of Virginia. Retrieved from [URL]
O’Brien, R. W., & Jones, E. (1976). The night Nixon spoke: A study of political effectiveness. Los Alamitos, CA: Hwong.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2019. A collection of studies of argumentation in practice. In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17], ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
