Cover not available

In:Argumentation in Actual Practice: Topical studies about argumentative discourse in context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen
[Argumentation in Context 17] 2019
► pp. 1–12

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 1
A collection of studies of argumentation in practice

 | ILIAS, University of Amsterdam | Leiden University
 | ILIAS, University of Amsterdam
Published online: 23 September 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.17.01van
References (18)
References
Akkermans, A. Snoeck Henkemans, F., Labrie, N. H. M., Henselmans, I., & van Laarhoven, H. W. M. (2019). Characteristics of argumentation in consultations about palliative systemic treatment for advanced cancer: An observational content analysis. This volume, Chapter 13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, M. J., & Schwarz, B. B. (2019). “Argumentexturing”: A framework for integrating theories of argumentation and learning. This volume, Chapter 11.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bøe-Hansen, O., & Kvernbekk, T. (2019). Protection stories: A case of military propaganda? This volume, Chapter 15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brambilla, E. (2019). Prototypical argumentative patterns in activist discourse: The case of the Greenpeace Detox Campaign. This volume, Chapter 10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doury, M. (2019). Analyzing versus interpreting argumentation: A clear-cut opposition or two poles on a continuous line? This volume, Chapter 2.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drury, S. A. Mehltretter, & Herbeck, D. A. (2019). Understanding abusive argumentum ad hominem through rhetorical context: Donald Trump’s ad hominem in the 2016 Presidential Campaign. This volume, Chapter 8.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H. (2018). Argumentation theory: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2019). And then you are left holding the baby! Strategic manoeuvring with the argumentum ad consequentiam. This volume, Chapter 17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, N.J.: Taylor and Francis/Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, J. (2019). Radically reframing the climate debate: The rhetorical strategies of The Hartwell Paper . This volume, Chapter 9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobs, S. (2019). Re-visiting Richard Nixon’s “Checkers” speech: Why argumentation critics need an audience-centered principle of rhetorical charity. This volume, Chapter 5.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kloosterhuis, H., & Smith, C. (2019). Interpretative legal argumentation and the Rule of Law as the Rule of Reasons. This volume, Chapter 14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leal, F. (2019). On philosophical argumentation: Towards a pragma-dialectical solution of a puzzle. This volume, Chapter 16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mădroane, I. D. (2019). Media dispositives and the enactment of one-sided practical arguments: A framework for the analysis of advocacy campaigns. This volume, Chapter 3.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Schär, R., Greco, S., Convertini, J., Iannaccone, A., & Rocci, A. (2019). Shifting from a monological to a dialogical perspective on children’s argumentation: Lessons learned. This volume, Chapter 12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zarefsky, D. (2019). Strategic ambiguity as an argumentative resource: The case of Lyndon Johnson, 50 years later. This volume, Chapter 6.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue