Cover not available

In:Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres
Edited by Assimakis Tseronis and Charles Forceville
[Argumentation in Context 14] 2017
► pp. 81–110

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 3
Editorial cartoons and ART

Arguing with Pinocchio

Published online: 20 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14.04gro
Abstract
Though they are often ignored in serious scholarship, editorial cartoons are an important vehicle for multimodal arguing. The present chapter outlines an “ART” approach to editorial cartoons which is rooted in contemporary argumentation theory. A series of examples are used to show how cartoons can be analyzed as instances of argument. To illustrate the significance of particular cartoon motifs, the chapter focuses on cartoons that depict political figures as Pinocchio – the magical wooden puppet in Carlo Collodi’s renowned children’s novel. In a number of ways, these cartoons challenge traditional assumptions that characterize conventional accounts of argument – among them, the common claim that pictures cannot negate.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.An ART approach to argument
    • 2.1Arguing, verbal and visual
    • 2.2Recognizing argument components
    • 2.3Testing the strength of arguments
  • 3.Pinocchio
    • 3.1Pinocchio as a form of visual negation
    • 3.2Pinocchio arguments
    • 3.3Testing Pinocchio arguments
    • 3.4Extended Pinocchio arguments
  • 4.Why Pinocchio? Why editorial cartoons?
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
References (27)
References
Ben Wekesa, N. (2012). Cartoons can talk? Visual analysis of cartoons on the 2007/2008 post-election violence in Kenya: A visual argumentation approach. Discourse & Communication, 6, 223–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bounegru, L., & Forceville, C. (2011). Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10, 209–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickinson, G., Blair, C., & Ott, B. (Eds.). (2010). Places of public memory: The Rhetoric of museums and memorials. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dove, I. J. (this volume). Arguing with illustrations: A visual archaeological debate about the proper place of Australopithecus Africanus .
Eitzen, D. (1995). When is a documentary? Documentary as a mode of reception. Cinema Journal, 35, 81–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feteris, E. T. (2013). The use of allusions to literary and cultural sources in argumentation in political cartoons. In H. van Belle, P. Gillaerts, B. van Gorp, D. van de Mieroop, & K. Rutten (Eds.), Verbal and visual rhetoric in a media world (pp. 415–428). Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feteris, E. T., Groarke, L., & Plug, H. J. (2011). Strategic manoeuvring with visual arguments in political cartoons: A pragma-dialectical analysis of the use of topoi that are based on common cultural heritage. In E. T. Feteris, B. Garssen, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with Pragma-Dialectics. In honour of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 59–74). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleming, D. (1996). Can pictures be arguments? Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 11–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groarke, L. (2002). Toward a pragma-dialectics of visual argument. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in pragma-dialectics (pp. 137–151). Amsterdam/Newport News: Sic Sat/Vale Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Going multimodal: What is a mode of arguing and why does it matter? Argumentation, 29, 133–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groarke, L., Palczewski, C. H., & Godden, D. (2016). Navigating the visual turn in argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 52, 217–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, R. H. (2003). Why ‘visual arguments’ aren’t arguments. In A. J. Blair, D. Farr, H. V. Hansen, R. H. Johnson, & C. W. Tindale (Eds.), Informal logic @25: Proceedings of the Windsor conference (pp. 1–13). Ontario: OSSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, J. E. (2015). The study of visual and multimodal argumentation. Argumentation, 29, 115–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kjørup, S. (1978). Pictorial speech acts. Erkenntnis, 12, 55–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lake, R. A., & Pickering, B. A. (1998). Argumentation, the visual, and the possibility of refutation: An exploration. Argumentation, 12, 79–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Navasky, V. S. (2013). The art of controversy: Political cartoons and their enduring power. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Novitz, D. (1977). Pictures and their use in communication. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pateman, T. (1980). How to do things with images. Theory and Society, 9, 603–622. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roque, G. (this volume). Rhetoric, argumentation, and persuasion in a multimodal perspective.
Shelley, C. (2001). Aspects of visual argument: A study of the march of progress. Informal Logic, 21, 85–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tseronis, A. (2015). Multimodal argumentation in news magazine covers: A case study of front covers putting Greece on the spot of the European economic crisis. Discourse, Context and Media, 7, 18–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van den Hoven, P. (2012). Getting your ad banned to bring the message home? A rhetorical analysis of an ad on the US national debt. Informal Logic, 32, 381–402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van den Hoven, P., & Schilperoord, J. (this volume). Perspective by incongruity. Visual argumentative meaning in editorial cartoons.
Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Worth, S. (1981). Pictures can’t say ‘ain’t.’ In L. Gross, (Ed.), Studying visual communication (pp. 162–184). Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Grzenkowicz, Maciej
2026. Non-verbal Artifacts and Propositionality: Adjusting Speech Act Theory To Accommodate Multimodal Argumentation. Argumentation DOI logo
Mefteh, Manel
2026. Trump's first month through the eyes of political cartoonists. Media International Australia DOI logo
Adler, Silvia & Ayelet Kohn
2024. Politicians in a nutshell: four-minute documentary portraits of three Israeli leaders. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed
2023. Do political cartoons and illustrations have their own specialized forms for warnings, threats, and the like? Speech acts in the nonverbal mode. Social Semiotics 33:1 ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo
Kohn, Ayelet
2023. Props as visual arguments in the political speeches of Binyamin Netanyahu. Social Semiotics 33:2 ► pp. 373 ff. DOI logo
Martynyuk, Alla & Olga Meleshchenko
2022. Socio-pragmatic potential of (verbo)-visual metaphtonymy in Internet memes featuring Donald Trump. Metaphor and the Social World 12:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Sadoun-Kerber, Keren
2021. Les avatars de l’autorité sur Twitter : l’exemple des usagers face à l’Allocution de Nouvel An du Président Macron. Argumentation et analyse du discours 26 DOI logo
Zhang, Cun
2021. The Sino–US trade war in political cartoons: A synthesis of semiotic, cognitive, and cultural perspectives. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:4 ► pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Forceville, Charles
2020. Visual and Multimodal Communication, DOI logo
Lugea, Jane
2018. The year’s work in stylistics 2017. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 27:4 ► pp. 329 ff. DOI logo
Tseronis, Assimakis
2017. Analysing multimodal argumentation within the pragma-dialectical framework. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 335 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue