In:Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres
Edited by Assimakis Tseronis and Charles Forceville
[Argumentation in Context 14] 2017
► pp. 51–80
Chapter 2The rhetorical and argumentative potentials of press photography
Published online: 20 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14.03kje
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14.03kje
Abstract
This chapter demonstrates the rhetorical and argumentative potentials of press photographs. More specifically, it examines photographs of the terrorist attacks on the USA on 9/11, 2001, and photographs of the Syrian toddler, Aylan Kurdi, who drowned during the migrant crisis in Europe in autumn of 2015. The chapter examines how these photographs exhibit argumentative dimensions and are used in argumentative ways in specific situations. A rhetorical, situational and textual-contextual approach demonstrates how a 9/11 photograph performed epideictic rhetorical functions, and how the images of Aylan Kurdi performed deliberative rhetorical functions. The chapter also examines the counter-argumentation to the Aylan Kurdi images and the widespread appropriation of the images into new argumentative forms.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The genre of press photography
- 3.The rhetorical perspective
- The situational and the contingent
- Decisions about action
- A form of human action and interaction
- The establishing and sustaining of common values
- 4.A situational textual-contextual approach to multimodal argumentation
- 5.The epideictic functions of a 9/11 photograph
- 5.1The attacks on New York
- 5.2Victim 0001
- 5.3The epideictic rhetoric of Victim 0001
- 6.The deliberative functions of the Aylan Kurdi images
- 6.1The European migrant crisis
- 6.2The Aylan Kurdi images
- 6.3The response to the Aylan Kurdi images in the United Kingdom
- 6.4Counter-argumentation to the Aylan Kurdi images
- 6.5The sharing and appropriation of the Aylan Kurdi images
- 7.Concluding remarks
Notes References
References (59)
Arnheim, R. (1982). The power of the center: A study of composition in the visual arts. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Batziou, A. (2011). Picturing immigration: Photojournalistic representation of immigrants in Greek and Spanish press. Chicago, IL: Intellect, The University of Chicago Press.
Becker, K., Ekecrantz, J., & Olsson, T. (2000). Picturing politics: Visual and textual formations of modernity in the Swedish press. Vol. 2000:1, JMK skriftserie. Stockholm: Institusjonen för journalistik, medier och kommunikation Stockholms universitet.
Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke, L. (1996). Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33, 1–10.
(1980). Functional communication. In E. E. White (Ed.), Rhetoric in transition. Studies in the nature and uses of rhetoric (pp. 21–38). Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State Unviversity Press.
Burke, K. (1941). The philosophy of literary form: Studies in symbolic action. Louisiana: State University Press.
Ceccarelli, L. (2010). Shaping science with rhetoric : The cases of Dobzhansky, Schrödinger, and Wilson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cicero, Marcus Tullius (trans. 1954). Cicero in twenty-eight volumes: A 1: Rhetorical treatises [Cicero] ad C. Herennium: de ratione dicendi (rhetorica ad Herennium). Vol. 403, The Loeb classical library. H. Caplan (Trans.). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Condit, C. M. (1985). The functions of epideictic: The Boston massacre orations as exemplar. Communication Quarterly, 33, 284–298.
Greenwood, K., & Smith, C. Z. (2007). How the world looks to us: International news in award-winning photographs from the Pictures of the Year, 1943–2003. Journalism Practice, 1, 82–101.
Hariman, R., & Lucaites, J. L. (2007). No caption needed: Iconic photographs, public culture, and liberal democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hill, C. A., & Helmers, M. A. (Eds.) (2004). Defining visual rhetorics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2007). Visual argumentation in Scandinavian political advertising. A cognitive, contextual and reception oriented approach. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43, 124–132.
(2013). Formulas of prize-winning press photos. In H. van Belle, P. Gillaerts, B. van Gorp, D. van de Mieroop, & K. Rutten (Eds.), Verbal and visual rhetoric in a media world (pp. 465–490). Leiden: Leiden University Press.
(2015a). The rhetoric of thick representation: How pictures render the importance and strength of an argument salient. Argumentation, 29, 197–215.
(2015d). Where is visual argument? In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory (pp. 107–117). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kock, C. (2009). Choice is not true or false: The domain of rhetorical argumentation. Argumentation, 23, 61–80.
Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
Linfield, S. (2010). The cruel radiance: Photography and political violence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (1992). The reconfigured eye: Visual truth in the post-photographic era. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Olson, L. C., Finnegan, C. A., & Hope, D. S. (Eds.). (2008). Visual rhetoric: A reader in communication and American culture. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, Ind: University of Notre Dame Press.
Perlmutter, D. D. (1998). Photojournalism and foreign policy: Icons of outrage in international crises. Westport, Conn: Praeger.
Prelli, L. J. (Ed.) (2006). Rhetorics of display: Studies in rhetoric/communication. Columbia, SC University of South Carolina Press.
Quintilianus, Marcus Fabius (trans. 1922). The Institutio oratoria of Quintilian: In four volumes: 3, The Loeb classical library. London: William Heinemann.
(2013). Bending the frame: Photojournalism, documentary, and the citizen (1st ed.). New York: Aperture Foundation.
Roque, G. (this volume). Rhetoric, argumentation, and persuasion in a multimodal perspective.
Stromer-Galley, J., & Schiappa, E. (1998). The argumentative burdens of audience conjectures: Audience research in popular culture criticism. Communication Theory, 8, 27–62.
Tindale, C. W. (1999). Acts of arguing: A rhetorical model of argument. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Van den Hoven, P., & Schilperoord, J. (this volume). Perspective by incongruity. Visual argumentative meaning in editorial cartoons.
Van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., Krabbe, E. C. W., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., Verheij, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2014). Handbook of argumentation theory. Dordrecht: Springer.
Wenzel, J. (1992). Perspectives on argument. In W. L. Benoit, D. Hample, & P. J. Benoit (Eds.), Readings in argumentation (pp. 121–144). Berlin, New York: Foris Publications.
Cited by (14)
Cited by 14 other publications
Han, Yanfang
Heshmati, Bita & Ewa Modrzejewska
Martikainen, Jari & Inari Sakki
Serafis, Dimitris, Irina Diana Mădroane & Theodor Lalér
2024. Critical reconstructions of populist multimodal argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 13:2 ► pp. 232 ff.
Mohammed, Dima
Mohammed, Dima
Novak, Marko
Serafis, Dimitris, Sara Greco, Chiara Pollaroli & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
Vezovnik, Andreja & Ljiljana Šarić
Kjeldsen, Jens E.
Lugea, Jane
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
