Collective decision-making and evaluation: Chapter 7. Case studies

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Chapter 7
Case studies

Published online: 7 December 2017

Article outline

7.1The editorial conference
- 7.1.1 Deliberative argumentative discussions in editorial conferences
7.1.2Evaluative argumentative discussions in editorial conferences
7.1.3Differences related to the medium
- 7.1.4Broadcasting an item on a possible snowfall: The SNOW case
  - 7.1.4.1 Should we broadcast an item on snow?
  - 7.1.4.2Subordinated issues
    - 7.1.4.2.1Should we interview a weather expert?
    - 7.1.4.2.2When should we broadcast the item on today’s snowfall?
- 7.1.5Choosing the front-page picture news: the LITF case
- 7.1.6Evaluating choices in a previous issue: the MALI case
- 7.1.7Criticizing an established practice: the FORM case
7.2The cutter-journalist discussion
- 7.2.1 Plane crash in Indonesia: the YOGI case
  - 7.2.1.1Who filmed the accident?
  - 7.2.1.2Are we allowed to say that this video was shot by a passenger?
  - 7.2.1.3Is the text “at risk of his life he switched on the camera” a journalistically adequate account of the event?
  - 7.2.1.4Is this video allowed by Téléjournal?
7.3Collective decision-making and evaluation: What did we find out?