Cover not available

In:Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peng Wu
[Argumentation in Context 12] 2017
► pp. 109–122

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
Argumentation in doctor-patient interaction

Medical consultation as a pragma-dialectical communicative activity type

Published online: 12 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.12.07pil
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Pragma-dialectical communicative activity types
  • 3.Medical consultation as a communicative activity type
  • 4.Preconditions for strategic manoeuvring in medical consultation
  • 5.A case in point
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (32)
References
Bal, B. Sonny (2009). An introduction to medical malpractice in the United States. Clinical Orthopaedics and Research 467, 339–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barth, Else M. and Erik C. W. Krabbe (1982). From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bensing, Jozien M., Fred Tromp, Sandra van Dulmen, Atie van den Brink-Muinen, William Verheul and François G. Schellevis. (2006). Shifts in doctor-patient communication between 1986 and 2002: A study of videotaped General Practice consultations with hypertension patients. BMC Family Practice 7, 62–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boedl, Karl, Klaus-Peter Adlassnig, Yoichi Hayashi, Thomas E. Rothenfluh and Harald Leitich (2004). Knowledge acquisition in the fuzzy knowledge representation framework of a medical consultation system. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 30, 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Judith Belle, Moira Stewart and Bridget L. Ryan (2003). Outcomes of patient-provider interaction. In: T. L. Thompson, A. M. Dorsey, K. I. Miller and R. Parrott (Eds.), Handbook of Health Communication. (pp. 141–162, Chapter 7). Mahwah / London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deveugele, Myriam, Anselme Derese, Stéphanie De Maesschalck, Sara Willems, Mieke Van Driel and Jan De Maeseneer (2005). Teaching communication skills to medical students, a challenge in the curriculum? Patient Education and Counseling 58, 265–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Bart Garssen (2008). Controversy and confrontation in argumentative discourse. In: F. H. van Eemeren and B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van and Peter Houtlosser (1999a). Delivering the goods in critical discussion. In: F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and Ch. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 163–167). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999b). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies, 1(4), 479–497. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). Theoretical construction and argumentative reality: An analytic model of critical discussion and conventionalised types of argumentative activity. In: D. Hitchcock (Ed.), The Uses of Argument: Proceedings of a Conference at McMaster University, 18–21 May 2005 (pp. 75–84). Hamilton: OSSA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006). Strategic manoeuvring: A synthetic recapitulation. Argumentation 20, 381–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garssen, Bart (2008). Comments on ‘Arguing ‘for’ the patient: Informed consent and strategic maneuvering in doctor–patient interaction’. Argumentation 22, 433–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodnight, G. Thomas (2006). When reasons matter most: Pragma-dialectics and the problem of informed consent. In: P. Houtlosser and A. van Rees (Eds.), Considering Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 75–85, Chapter 7). Mahwah / London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Have, Paul ten (1991). Talk and institution: A reconsideration of the “asymmetry” of doctor-patient interaction. In: D. Boden and D. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk in Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis (pp. 138–163, Chapter 6). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heath, Christian (1986). Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. (1977). Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Tavistock Publications: London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (1979). Activity types and language. Linguistics 17(5), 365–399.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992). Activity types and language. In: P. Drew and J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 66–100, Chapter 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohammed, Dima (2008). Institutional insights for analysing strategic manoeuvring in the British Prime Minister’s Question Time. Argumentation 22, 377–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, Edmond A. (1997). The Logic of Medicine. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patel, Vimla L., Edward H. Shortliffe, Mario Stefanelli, Peter Szolovits, Michael R. Berthold, Riccardo Bellazi and Ameen Abu-Hanna (2009). The coming of age of artificial intelligence in medicine. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 46, 5–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pilgram, R. (2015). A doctor’s argument by authority: An analytical and empirical study of strategic manoeuvring in medical consultation. Doctoral dissertationUniversity of Amsterdam. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reibl v. Hughes. (1980). 2 S. C. R. 880. Retrieved from [URL] on 20 August 2009.
Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2003). An interactional structure of medical activities during acute visits and its implications for patients’ participation. Health Communication 15(1), 27–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schulz, Peter J. and Sara Rubinelli (2006). Healthy arguments for literacy in health. Paper presented at the 2006 Spring Symposia of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from [URL] on 20 August 2009.
(2008). Arguing ‘for’ the patient: Informed consent and strategic maneuvring in doctor-patient interaction. Healthy arguments for literacy in health. Argumentation 22, 423–432. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tuckett, David, Mary Boulton, Coral Olson and Anthony Williams (1985). Meeting Between Experts: An Approach to Sharing Ideas in Medical Consultations. London / New York: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wet op de geneeskundige behandelingsovereenkomst [Law on the medical treatment agreement] (1995). Retrieved from [URL] 20 August 2009.
Zandbelt, Linda C. (2006). Patient-centred Communication in the Medical Specialist Consultation. Amsterdam: Buijten & Schipperheijn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue