In:Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren and Peng Wu
[Argumentation in Context 12] 2017
► pp. 1–10
Chapter 1Introduction Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics
Published online: 12 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.12.01int
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.12.01int
References (11)
. (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam etc.: John Benjamins. Argumentation in Context 2.
(Ed.) (2017), Prototypical Argumentative Patterns. Exploring the Relationship between Argumentative Discourse and Institutional Context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Argumentation in Context 9.
Eemeren, F. H. van, Garssen, B. J., & Meuffels, B. (2009). Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness. Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules. Dordrecht: Springer. Argumentation Library 16.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht/Berlin: Foris/De Gruyter.
(1992). Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale (N.J.): Lawrence Erlbaum.
(2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst, R., Jackson, S., & Jacobs, S. (1993). Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Tuscaloosa/London: The University of Alabama Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
