In:Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren
[Argumentation in Context 11] 2017
► pp. v–vi
Get fulltext
This article is available free of charge.
Published online: 14 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.toc
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.toc
Table of contents
Preface
vii
Acknowledgment
ix
Chapter 1.Introduction
1
Frans H. van Eemeren
Chapter 2.Argumentative patterns viewed from a pragma-dialectical perspective
7
Frans H. van Eemeren
Chapter 3.The role of pragmatic problem-solving argumentation in plenary debate in the European parliament
31
Bart Garssen
Chapter 4.The role of pragmatic and majority argumentation in reports of European parliamentary committees of inquiry
53
Corina Andone
Chapter 5.The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions
71
Eveline T. Feteris
Chapter 6.The role of pragmatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements
93
A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
Chapter 7.Argumentative patterns with argumentation by example in legislative debate in the European Parliament
109
Bart Garssen
Chapter 8.Argumentative patterns with symptomatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions
125
Eveline T. Feteris
Chapter 9.Argumentative patterns with symptomatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements
139
A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
Chapter 10.The dependency of argumentative patterns on the institutional context
157
Frans H. van Eemeren
Authors
181
Index
183
