In:Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren
[Argumentation in Context 11] 2017
► pp. 157–180
Chapter 10The dependency of argumentative patterns on the institutional context
Published online: 14 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.10van
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.10van
Article outline
- 10.1Identifying prototypical argumentative patterns
- 10.2Exploitation of the same argument scheme
- 10.3Exploitation of different argument schemes
-
10.4Institutional rationales of argumentative patterns
- 10.4.1Prototypical argumentative patterns exploiting the same argument scheme
- Basic patterns of the main argumentation
- Elaborate patterns of extended argumentation
- 10.4.2Prototypical argumentative patterns based on differentiated argument schemes
- Basic patterns of the main argumentation
- Elaborate patterns of extended argumentation
- 10.4.1Prototypical argumentative patterns exploiting the same argument scheme
- 10.5Conclusion
Notes References
References (14)
Andone, C. (2016). Argumentative patterns in the political domain. The case of European parliamentary committees of inquiry. Argumentation, 30(1), 45–60.
Eemeren, F. H. van (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2016a). Bingo! Promising developments in argumentation theory. In F. H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Reflections on theoretical issues in argumentation theory (pp. 3–25). Dordrecht etc.: Springer.
(2016b). Identifying argumentative patterns. A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics. Argumentation, 30(1), 1–23.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Garssen, B. (2014). Argumentation by analogy in stereotypical argumentative patterns. In H. Jales Ribeiro (Ed.), Systematic approaches to argument by analogy (pp. 41–56). Dordrecht: Springer.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Feteris, E. T. (2016). Prototypical argumentative patterns in a legal context. The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of decisions. Argumentation, 30(1), 61–79.
(2017). The identification of prototypical argumentative patterns in the justification of judicial decisions. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 6(1), 44–58.
Garssen, B. (2016). Problem-solving argumentative patterns in plenary debates of the European Parliament. Argumentation, 30(1), 25–43.
(2017). The role of the argument by example in legislative debates of the European Parliament. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 6(1), 27–43.
Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2016). Argumentative patterns in over-the-counter medicine advertisements. Argumentation, 30(1), 81–95.
(2017). Argumentative patterns using symptomatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 6(1), 59–75.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Brambilla, Emanuele
Hernández, Alfonso
2021. Journalists’ moves in political press conferences and their implications for accountability. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:3 ► pp. 281 ff.
Fairclough, Isabela
2019. Deontic power and institutional contexts. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:1 ► pp. 136 ff.
Schröter, Juliane M.
2019. The TV addresses of the Swiss government before popular votes. Journal of Argumentation in Context 8:3 ► pp. 285 ff.
van Eemeren, Frans H.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.