In:Prototypical Argumentative Patterns: Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context
Edited by Frans H. van Eemeren
[Argumentation in Context 11] 2017
► pp. 93–108
Chapter 6The role of pragmatic argumentation in over-the-counter medicine advertisements
Published online: 14 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.06sno
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.11.06sno
Article outline
- 6.1Introduction
- 6.2The use of pragmatic argumentation as an institutional requirement
- 6.3Argumentative patterns in over-the-counter medicine advertisements
- 6.4The argumentative patterns resulting from strategic maneuvering within institutional constraints
- 6.5Exemplary analysis of a prototypical pattern of an OTC-medicine advertisement
- 6.6Conclusion
Notes References
References (11)
Eemeren, F. H. van (2016). Identifying argumentative patterns. A vital step in the methodical development of pragma-dialectics. Argumentation, 30(1), 1–23. (Special issue on argumentative patterns in discourse).
Goodnight, G. T. (2008). Strategic maneuvering in direct to consumer drug advertising. A study in argumentation theory and new institutional theory. Argumentation, 22(3), 359–371.
Health Canada (2006). Consumer advertising guidelines for marketed health products (for nonprescription drugs including natural health products. [URL]
Keuringsraad KOAG/KAG (2013). Code voor de publieksreclame voor geneesmiddelen. [URL]
Jacobs, S. (1995). Implicatures and deception in the arguments of commercial advertising. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Special fields and cases. Proceedings of the third ISSA conference on argumentation. Vol. IV (pp. 579–592). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
PAGB Medicines Advertising codes (2009 edition, updated July 2013). [URL]
Poppel, L. van, & Rubinelli, S. (2011) ‘Try the smarter way’. On the claimed efficacy of advertised medicines. In E. T. Feteris, B. Garssen & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics (pp. 153–164). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Rubinelli, S., Nakamoto, K., & Schulz, P. J. (2008). The rabbit in the hat. Dubious argumentation and the persuasive effects of direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medicines. Communication & Medicine, 5(1), 49–58.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Finsen, Andreas Bilstrup & Jean Wagemans
Хоменко, Ірина
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
