Cover not available

In:Argumentation across Communities of Practice: Multi-disciplinary perspectives
Edited by Cornelia Ilie and Giuliana Garzone
[Argumentation in Context 10] 2017
► pp. 291–316

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 12
Visual arguments in activists’ campaigns

A pragmadialectical perspective

Published online: 2 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.10.13deg
Abstract
This chapter contributes to the ongoing debate on the possibility and realizations of visual arguments, focussing on advertisements produced by NGOs as part of their campaigns – image-based messages that are inherently argumentative and whose reach, thanks to the Web, extends well beyond the time and space constraints of the campaigns themselves. One of the nodes of such a debate concerns whether visuals can express at the same time the two parts of an argument (standpoint and supporting argument), and how each of them can be identified. The analysis carried out here heads into this direction, by putting to use categories from Kress and van Leeuwen’s ‘grammar’ of visual design and combining them with the tenets of the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of the literature
  • 3.Material and method
  • 4.Analysis
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (58)
References
Alcolea-Banegas, J. (2009). Visual Arguments in Film. Argumentation, 23: 259–275. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrews, R., Costello, P. J. M., & Clarke, S. (1993). Improving the Quality of Argument: Final Report. Hull, England: University of Hull, School of Education, Centre for Studies in Rhetoric.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balthrop, W. (1980). Argument as linguistic opportunity: A search for form and function. In J. Rhodes & S. Newell (Eds), Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation (pp. 184–213). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birdsell, D. S., & Groarke L. (1996). Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33 (1), 1–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birdsell, D. S., and Groarke L. (2008). Outlines of a Theory of Visual Argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 43 (1), 103–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blair, J. A. (2012)2. The possibility and actuality of visual arguments. In C. W. Tindale (Ed.), Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation, Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair (pp. 23–39). Dordrecht: Springer (First edition Argumentation and Advocacy, 1996).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowman, J. W. (1968). Graphic Communication. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buchanan, R. (1989). Declaration by design: Rhetoric, argument, and demonstration in design practice. In V. Margolin (Ed.), Design Discourse: History, Theory, Criticism (pp. 91–109). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, R. & Dressler, W. (1981/2001). Introduction to Text Linguistics. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degano, C. (2013). Argumentation in Hypertext: A Case Study of NGOs’ Campaigning. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 2 (2), 204–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Textuality on the Web: A Focus on Argumentative Text Types. In H. L. Lim & F. Sudweeks (Ed.), Innovative Methods and Technologies for Electronic Discourse Analysis (pp. 414–436). Hershey PA: IGI Global. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delicath, W. J, & Kevin M. D. (2003). Image Events, the Public Sphere, and Argumentative Practice: The Case of Radical Environmental Groups. Argumentation, 17, 315–333. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst R. (1984). Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Floris Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. A Pragma-dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst R. 2004. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst R, & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2002). Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. Mahwa (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst R., Jackson S., & Jacobs S. (1993). Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse. Studies in Rhetoric and Communication. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Houtlosser P. (2002). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Maintaining a Delicate Balance. In F. H. van Eemeren, & Houtlosser, P. (Eds.), Dialectic and Rhetoric. The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis (pp. 131–159). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Houtlosser P., Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2007). Argumentative Indicators in Discourse: A Pragma-Dialectical Study. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, F. H. van, Grootendorst R., & Kruiger T. (1984). The Study of Argumentation. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleming, D. (1996). Can pictures be arguments? Argumentation & Advocacy, 33 (1), 11–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, F. R. (1994a). Beyond ‘The Empty Eye’: A conversation with S. I. Hayakawa and Alan R. Hayakawa. In R. F. Fox (Ed.), Images in Language, Media, and Mind (pp. 183–192). Urbana, IL: NCTE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994b). Where we live. In R. F. Fox (Ed.), Images in Language, Media, and Mind (pp. 69–91). Urbana, IL: NCTE.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 109–142). [URL]. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
Garzone, G., Catenaccio P., & Poncini G. (Eds). (2007). Multimodality in Corporate Communication. Web Genres and Discursive Identity. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gombrich, H. E. (1982). The visual image: Its place in communication. In E. H. Gombrich (Ed.), The Image and the Eye: Further Studies in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation (pp. 137–161). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodnight, G. T. (1991). Controversy. In D. Parson (Ed.) Argument in Controversy: Proceedings of the seventh SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 1–13). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds) Syntax and Semantics (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groarke, L. (1996). Logic, Art and Argument. Informal Logic, 18 (2/3), 105–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groarke, L (2002). Toward a pragmadialectics of visual argument. In F. H. van Eemeren (Ed.), Advances in Pragma-Dialectics (pp. 137–151). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groarke, L. (2009). Five Theses on Toulmin and Visual Argument. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen, Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues (pp. 229–239). Dortrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groarke, L, & Tindale C. W. (2004). Good Reasoning Matters!: A Constructive Approach to Critical Thinking. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermeren, Göran. (1969). Representation and Meaning in the Visual Arts. Lund: Scandinavian University Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hintikka, J., & Bachman J. (1991). What if . . . ? Toward excellence in reasoning. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jamieson, K. H. (1988). Eloquence in an Electronic Age: The Transformation of Political Speechmaking. New York: Oxford UP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, R. (2005). Why ‘Visual Arguments’ aren’t Arguments. In H. V. Hansen, C. Tindale, J. A. Blair & R. H. Johnson (Eds), Informal Logic at 25. University of Windsor, CD-ROM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, E. J. (2007). Visual argumentation in Scandinavian political advertising: A cognitive, contextual, and reception oriented approach. Argumentation and Advocacy, 43, 124–132.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Pictorial Argumentation in Advertising: Visual Tropes and Figures as a Wayof Creating Visual Argumentation. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies (pp. 239–255). Argumentation Library. Dortrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kneupper, W. C. (1978). On argument and diagrams. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 14, 181–186.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. London / New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuven T. (2006). The Grammar of Visual Design. London / New York: Routledge (second edition).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lake, A. R., & Pickering, B. A. (1998). Argumentation, the Visual, and the Possibility of Refutation: An Exploration. Argumentation, 12, 79–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manovich, L. (1998). Cinema as a Cultural Interface. In W3LAB, <[URL]>. Reprinted in J. Olsson (Ed.) (2000). Arresting Movements: From Pre-Cinema to Digital Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Medhurst, M. J., & DeSousa, M. A. (1981). Political cartoons as rhetorical form: A taxonomy of graphic discourse. Communication Monographs, 48, 197–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Keefe, D. J. (1977). Two concepts of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 13, 121–128.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1982). The concepts of argument and arguing. In J. R. Cox, & C. A. Willard (Eds), Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research (pp. 3–23). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olson, K. M., & Godnight T. G. (1994). Entanglements of Consumption, Cruelty, Privacy and Fashion: The Social Controversy over Fur. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80, 249–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Postman, N. (1985). Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shelley, C. (1996). Rhetorical and demonstrative modes of visual argument: Looking at images of human evolution. Argumentation and Advocacy, 33 (2), 53–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2003). Aspects of visual arguments: A study of the ‘March of Progress. Informal Logic, 21 (2), 92–112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slade, C. (2003). Seeing Reasons: Visual Argumentation in Advertisement. Argumentation, 17, 145–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toulmin, E. S., Rieke R. D., & Allan Janik. (1979). An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toulmin, E. S. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werlich, E. (1983). A Text Grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle & MeyerGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Stöckl, Hartmut
2024. Detecting generic patterns in multimodal argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 13:2 ► pp. 260 ff. DOI logo
Tseronis, Assimakis, Ramy Younis & Mehmet Ali Üzelgün
2024. A proposal for the evaluation of multimodal argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 13:2 ► pp. 292 ff. DOI logo
Săftoiu, Răzvan & Noémi Tudor
2023. Ethnic humour in cartoons. Language and Dialogue 13:3 ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Brambilla, Emanuele
2019. Prototypical argumentative patterns in activist discourse. In Argumentation in Actual Practice [Argumentation in Context, 17], ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue