Cover not available

In:Exploring Future Paths for Historical Sociolinguistics
Edited by Tanja Säily, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin and Anita Auer
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 7] 2017
► pp. 23–52

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Exploring part-of-speech frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English

 | University of Helsinki
 | University of Helsinki
Published online: 19 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.7.02sai
We investigate the usefulness of part-of-speech (POS) annotation as a tool in the study of sociolinguistic variation and genre evolution. We analyse how POS ratios change over time in the Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence (c.1410–1681), which social groups lead the changes, and whether the changes can be connected to colloquialisation with regard to reduced complexity or an increasingly involved style. While we find gentry-led colloquialisation in terms of noun and verb frequencies as well as evidence for gendered styles, the results on structural complexity are more mixed. We argue that POS annotation can be a useful tool when complemented by a thorough textual analysis, but that more fine-grained categories are needed to reach firmer conclusions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1POS ratios in the study of (sociolinguistic) variation
    • 2.2Complexity in the genre of personal correspondence
  • 3.Material and method
    • 3.1PCEEC and ReCEEC
    • 3.2Visualisation
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Complexity in the Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence
    • 4.2Colloquialisation and gendered styles
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (56)
References
Argamon, Shlomo, Moshe Koppel, Jonathan Fine & Anat Rachel Shimoni. 2003. Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts. Text 23(3). 321–346. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atzmueller, Martin. 2015. Subgroup discovery. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 5(1). 35–49. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamman, David, Jacob Eisenstein & Tyler Schnoebelen. 2014. Gender identity and lexical variation in social media. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(2). 135–160. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Allan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2). 145–204. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1992. On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes 15(2). 133–163. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1995. Dimensions of register variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Jena Burges. 2000. Historical change in the language use of women and men: Gender differences in dramatic dialogue. Journal of English Linguistics 28(1). 21–37. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, genre, and style (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1989. Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65(3). 487–517. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1997. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds.), To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 52), 253–275. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Bethany Gray. 2010. Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2). 104–134. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Bethany Gray. 2011. The historical shift of scientific academic prose in English towards less explicit styles of expression: Writing without verbs. In Vijay Bhatia, Purificación Sánchez Hernández & Pascual Pérez-Paredes (eds.), Researching specialized languages (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 47), 11–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray & Shelley Staples. 2016. Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels. Applied Linguistics 37(5). 639–668. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carpenter, Bob, Andrew Gelman, Matt Hoffman, Daniel Lee, Ben Goodrich, Michael Betancourt, Marcus Brubaker, Jiqiang Guo, Peter Li & Allen Riddell. 2017. Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software 76(1). DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1982. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Spoken and written language, 35–53. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardie, Andrew. 2007. Part-of-speech ratios in English corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12(1). 55–81. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heylighen, Francis & Jean-Marc Dewaele. 2002. Variation in the contextuality of language: An empirical measure. Foundations of Science 7(3). 293–340. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinneburg, Alexander, Heikki Mannila, Samuli Kaislaniemi, Terttu Nevalainen & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2007. How to handle small samples: Bootstrap and Bayesian methods in the analysis of linguistic change. Literary and Linguistic Computing 22(2). 137–150. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.). 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 1994. About 37% of word-tokens are nouns. Language 70(2). 331–339. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karlsson, Fred. 2008. Complexity in linguistic theorizing. The Mental Lexicon 9(2). 144–169.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kohnen, Thomas. 2007. ‘Connective profiles’ in the history of English texts. Aspects of orality and literacy. In Ursula Lenker & Anneli Meurman-Solin (eds.), Connectives in the history of English, 289–308. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1982. Building on empirical foundations. In Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics: Papers from a conference held at the meeting of the Language Theory Division, Modern Language Assn, San Francisco, 27–30 December 1979 (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 24), 17–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1990. The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2(2). 205–254. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter. 1965. The world we have lost. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehto, Anu. 2015. The genre of Early Modern English statutes: Complexity in historical legal language (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 97). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Christian, Marianne Hundt, Geoffrey Leech & Nicholas Smith. 2002. Short term diachronic shifts in part-of-speech frequencies. A comparison of the tagged LOB and F-LOB corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 7(2). 245–264. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mäkelä, Eetu, Tanja Säily & Terttu Nevalainen. 2016. Khepri – a modular view-based tool for exploring (historical sociolinguistic) data. In Maciej Eder & Jan Rybicki (eds.), Digital Humanities 2016: Conference abstracts, 269–272. Kraków: Jagiellonian University & Pedagogical University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markus, Manfred. 2001. The development of prose in Early Modern English in view of the gender question: Using grammatical idiosyncracies of 15th and 17th century letters. European Journal of English Studies 5(2). 181–196. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meurman-Solin, Anneli. 2011. Utterance-initial connective elements in early Scottish epistolary prose. In Anneli Meurman-Solin & Ursula Lenker (eds.), Connectives in synchrony and diachrony in European languages (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 8). Helsinki: VARIENG. [URL] (17 December, 2016.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2004. Address in early English correspondence: Its forms and socio-pragmatic functions (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 64). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2002. Language and woman’s place in earlier English. Journal of English Linguistics 30(2). 181–199. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2003. Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stuart England (Longman Linguistics Library). London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newman, Matthew L., Carla J. Groom, Lori D. Handelman & James W. Pennebaker. 2008. Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes 45(3). 211–236. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna. 1999. Grammaticalization and social embedding: I THINK and METHINKS in Middle and Early Modern English (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 55). Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna. 2000. The language of husbands and wives in seventeenth-century correspondence. In Christian Mair & Marianne Hundt (eds.), Corpus linguistics and linguistics theory. Papers from the twentieth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 20), Freiburg im Breisgau 1999 (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 33), 289–300. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arja Nurmi, Ann Taylor, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Terttu Nevalainen. Compiled by the CEEC Project TeamPCEEC = Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, tagged version. 2006. Annotated by Arja Nurmi, Ann Taylor, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Terttu Nevalainen. Compiled by the CEEC Project Team. York: University of York & Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Distributed through the Oxford Text Archive. [URL] (17 December, 2016.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL] (17 December, 2016.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena & Terttu Nevalainen. 2007. Historical sociolinguistics: The Corpus of Early English Correspondence. In Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan & Hermann L. Moisl (eds.), Creating and digitizing language corpora, volume 2: Diachronic databases, 148–171. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicholas. 1998. Complexity: A philosophical overview. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Säily, Tanja, Terttu Nevalainen & Harri Siirtola. 2011. Variation in noun and pronoun frequencies in a sociohistorical corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing 26(2). 167–188. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Santorini, Beatrice. 2016. Annotation manual for the Penn Historical Corpora and the York-Helsinki Corpus of Early English Correspondence. [URL] (17 December, 2016.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siirtola, Harri, Poika Isokoski, Tanja Säily & Terttu Nevalainen. 2016. Interactive text visualization with Text Variation Explorer. In Ebad Banissi, Mark W. McK. Bannatyne, Fatma Bouali, Remo Burkhard, John Counsell, Urska Cvek, Martin J. Eppler, Georges Grinstein, Wei Dong Huang, Sebastian Kernbach, Chun-Cheng Lin, Feng Lin, Francis T. Marchese, Chi Man Pun, Muhammad Sarfraz, Marjan Trutschl, Anna Ursyn, Gilles Venturini, Theodor G. Wyeld & Jian J. Zhang (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Information Visualisation (IV 2016), 330–335. Los Alamitos, California, CA: IEEE Computer Society. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siirtola, Harri, Terttu Nevalainen, Tanja Säily & Kari-Jouko Räihä. 2011. Visualisation of text corpora: A case study of the PCEEC. In Terttu Nevalainen & Susan M. Fitzmaurice (eds.), How to deal with data: Problems and approaches to the investigation of the English language over time and space (Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 7). Helsinki: VARIENG. [URL] (17 December, 2016.)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siirtola, Harri, Tanja Säily, Terttu Nevalainen & Kari-Jouko Räihä. 2014. Text Variation Explorer: Towards interactive visualization tools for corpus linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19(3). 417–429. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik. 2008. The progressive and phrasal verbs: Evidence of colloquialization in nineteenth-century English? In Terttu Nevalainen, Irma Taavitsainen, Päivi Pahta & Minna Korhonen (eds.), The dynamics of linguistic variation: Corpus evidence on English past and present (Studies in Language Variation 2), 269–289. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1991. You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann. 2007. The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. In Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan & Hermann L. Moisl (eds.), Creating and digitizing language corpora, volume 2: Diachronic databases, 196–227. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann & Beatrice Santorini. 2006. The Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence. University of York. [URL] (17 December, 2016.)
Vartiainen, Turo, Tanja Säily & Mikko Hakala. 2013. Variation in pronoun frequencies in early English letters: Gender-based or relationship-based? In Jukka Tyrkkö, Olga Timofeeva & Maria Salenius (eds.), Ex philologia lux: Essays in honour of Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 90), 233–255. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Säily, Tanja, Martin Hilpert & Jukka Suomela
2024. New approaches to investigating change in derivational productivity. In Crossing Boundaries through Corpora [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 119], ► pp. 8 ff. DOI logo
Säily, Tanja, Turo Vartiainen, Harri Siirtola & Terttu Nevalainen
2024. Changing styles of letter-writing?. In Unlocking the History of English [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 364], ► pp. 154 ff. DOI logo
Vartiainen, Turo & Tanja Säily
2024. Engaging with bad (meta)data in historical corpus linguistics. In Challenges in corpus linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 118], ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Saario, Lassi, Tanja Säily, Samuli Kaislaniemi & Terttu Nevalainen
2021. The burden of legacy: Producing the Tagged Corpus of Early English Correspondence Extension (TCEECE). Research in Corpus Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 104 ff. DOI logo
Leiwo, Martti
2020. L2 Greek in Roman Egypt: Intense language contact in Roman military forts. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 6:2 DOI logo
Rudnicka, Karolina
2018. Variation of sentence length across time and genre. In Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 85], ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue