In:Changing Genre Conventions in Historical English News Discourse
Edited by Birte Bös and Lucia Kornexl
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 5] 2015
► pp. 191–222
Speech-like syntax in written texts
Changing syntactic conventions in news discourse
Published online: 24 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.5.08has
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.5.08has
This article explores the extent to which present-day written news discourse has
become more speech-like regarding the structure of sentences. Three features
will be analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively: the use of conjunctions as
extra-clausal linking devices, the occurrence of disintegrated clausal units, and
the loose attachment of syntactic fragments, i.e. of non-clausal material, to a
completed syntagma. The data are taken from news reports in a quality paper
and a popular paper from two time samples, dating from 1900 and 2013. The
results give evidence for an increasing informalization of British written news
discourse and thus align themselves with proposals to the general drift of written
registers toward more oral styles.
References (37)
Altenberg, Bengt. 1986. Contrastive linking in spoken and written English. In Gunnel Tottie & Ingegerd Bäcklund (eds.), English in speech and writing. A symposium, 13–40. Uppsala: Almquist & Wiksell.
Auer, Peter. 2007. Syntax als Prozess. In Heiko Hausendorf (ed.), Gespräch als Prozess: Linguistische Aspekte der Zeitlichkeit verbaler Interaktion, 95–124. Tübingen: Narr.
Baron, Naomi S. 2008. Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. New York: Oxford University Press.
. 2012. The impact of electronically-mediated communication on language standards and style. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 329–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barth, Dagmar. 2000. “That’s true, although not really, but still …”: Concessive relations in spoken English discourse. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause, condition, concession and contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives, 411–438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bell, David. 1998. Cancellative discourse markers: A core/periphery approach. Pragmatics 8. 515–541.
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan. 1989. Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65. 487–517.
Biber, Douglas & Bethany Gray. 2012. The competing demands of popularization vs. economy: Written language in the age of mass literacy. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth C. Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 314–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Birner, Betty & Gregory Ward. 2004. Information structure and noncanonical syntax. In Lawrence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 153–174. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bös, Birte. 2012. From 1760 to 1960: Diversification and popularization. In Roberta Facchinetti, Nicholas Brownlees, Birte Bös & Udo Fries, News as changing texts: Corpora, methodologies and analysis, 91–143. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Chafe, Wallace. 1987. Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Russel S. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse, 21–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
. 1988. Linking intonation units. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 1–27. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Tsuyoshi Ono. 2007. ‘Incrementing’ in conversation: A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics 17. 513–522.
Dovifat, Emil & Jürgen Wilke. 1976. Zeitungslehre. Band 1: Theoretische und rechtliche Grundlagen, Nachricht und Meinung, Sprache und Form. 3rd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 1994. Conversationalization of public discourse and the authority of the consumer. In Russell Keat, Nigel Whiteley & Nicholas Abercrombie (eds.), The authority of the consumer, 253–268. New York: Routledge.
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson. 2002. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence, 14–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hundt, Marianne & Christian Mair. 1999. “Agile” and “uptight” genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4. 221–242.
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair & Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, Jim & Regina Weinert. 1998. Spontaneous spoken language: Syntax and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
PressGazette. UK newspaper sales: Relatively strong performances from Sun and Mirror
. [URL]. (19 March, 2014).
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, Kristina. 2000. The emergence and development of headlines in English newspapers. In Friedrich Ungerer (ed.), English media texts – past and present: Language and textual structure, 45–65. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1986. On the origins of and and but connectives in English. Studies in Language 10. 137–150.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
