In:Changing Genre Conventions in Historical English News Discourse
Edited by Birte Bös and Lucia Kornexl
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 5] 2015
► pp. 103–134
Late Modern English death notices
Transformations of a traditional lay audiences
Published online: 24 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.5.05bor
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.5.05bor
Death notices are traditional texts that have become conventionalised within
a certain speech community. They use highly standardised expressions and
established structural patterns to fulfil the function of informing about an
individual’s death. This paper traces the development and linguistic realisation
of this text type throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. The study is based on a
qualitative analysis of a diachronic corpus, the Corpus of English Death Notices
(CEDN), which consists of 400 death notices published between 1801 and 2012
in four English newspapers (The Morning Chronicle, The Daily News, The Times,
and The Guardian). The pre-set macrostructure of the text type can be described
in terms of a template consisting of thirteen different structural elements. The
analysis of the text samples shows that many of these structural elements display
social and cultural norms and conventions. Ten of the elements can already be
found at the beginning of the 19th century; a further three elements start to
appear within the period of investigation, adding new communicative functions
to the texts. Based on their frequency of occurrence, they can be categorised as
obligatory or optional elements of the text type. The diachronic investigation
shows that some of these components remain stable whereas others change status.
As regards their linguistic realisation, tendencies towards greater precision,
e.g. when mentioning the date of death, as well as tendencies towards more
vague expressions, e.g. when referring to the circumstances of the death, can be
observed.
References (27)
CEDN = Corpus of English Death Notices, 1801–2012. Compiled by Sarah Borde. Rostock: University of Rostock.
Secondary sources
Adams, Sheila. 1997. Women, death and In memoriam notices in a local British newspaper. In Kathy Charmaz (ed.), The unknown country: Death in Australia, Britain, and the USA, 98–112. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Biber, Douglas. 1990. Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analyses of linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing 5. 257–269.
Eckkrammer, Eva Martha. 1996. Die Todesanzeige als Spiegel kultureller Konventionen: Eine kontrastive Analyse deutscher, englischer, französischer, spanischer, italienischer und portugiesischer Todesanzeigen. Bonn: Romanistischer Verlag.
Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1987. Text strategies: Single, dual, multiple. In Ross Steele & Terry Threadgold (eds.), Language topics: Essays in honour of Michael Halliday, 203–211. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Flowerdew, Lynne. 2004. The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional language. In Ulla Connor & Thomas Upton (eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics, 11–33. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Fries, Udo. 1990a. A contrastive analysis of German and English death notices. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Further insights into contrastive analysis, 539–560. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
. 1990b. Two hundred years of English death notices. In Margaret Bridges (ed.), On strangeness, 57–71. Tübingen: Narr.
. 2006. Death notices: The birth of a genre. In Roberta Facchinetti & Matti Rissanen (eds.), Corpus-based studies of diachronic English, 157–170. Bern: Lang.
Hinrichs, Ilka-Marthje. 1994. Untersuchungen zur Textsorte ‘Todesanzeige’. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Kiel.
Jalland, Pat. 1999. Victorian death and its decline, 1850–1918. In Peter C. Jupp & Clare Gittings (eds.), Death in England: An illustrated history, 230–255. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
. 2010. Death in war and peace: Loss and grief in England, 1914–1970. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Janz, Christina. 1996. Mehrdimensionale Textsortenklassifikation unter prototypischem Aspekt. In Angelika Feine & Hans-Joachim Siebert (eds.), Beiträge zur Text- und Stilanalyse, 79–86. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
Jupp, Peter C. & Tony Walter. 1999. The healthy society, 1918–98. In Peter C. Jupp & Clare Gittings (eds.), Death in England: An illustrated history, 256–282. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Lipka, Leonhard. 2002. Non-serious text types and German death notices – an unlikely pair. In Andreas Fischer, Gunnel Tottie & Hans Martin Lehmann (eds.), Text types and corpora: Studies in honour of Udo Fries, 59–66. Tübingen: Narr.
Piitulainen, Marja-Lena. 1993. Die Textstruktur der finnischen und deutschsprachigen Todesanzeigen. In Hartmut Schröder (ed.), Fachtextpragmatik, 141–181. Tübingen: Narr.
Reiss, Katharina. 1977. Textsortenkonventionen: Vergleichende Untersuchung zur Todesanzeige. Le Langage et l’Homme 35. 46–55.
Stein, Stephan. 2008. Verbergen und Verschlüsseln in Todesanzeige und Nachruf: Über den Umgang mit Tod und Trauer in öffentlicher Kommunikation. In Steffen Pappert, Melani Schröter & Ulla Fix (eds.), Verschlüsseln, Verbergen, Verdecken in öffentlicher und institutioneller Kommunikation, 223–253. Berlin: Schmidt.
. 2010. Versprachlichungsstrategien beim öffentlichen Reden über Tod und Trauer: Was Todesanzeigen verbergen – und offenlegen. Sprachwissenschaft 35. 369–409.
Suter, Hans-Jürg. 1993. The wedding report: A prototypical approach to the study of traditional text types. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
von der Lage-Müller, Kathrin. 1995. Text und Tod: Eine handlungstheoretisch orientierte Textsortenbeschreibung am Beispiel der Todesanzeige in der deutschsprachigen Schweiz. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
