Cover not available

In:Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English
Edited by Marina Dossena
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 4] 2015
► pp. 153–177

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Nineteenth-century institutional (im)politeness

Responses of the Colonial Office to letters from William Parker, 1820 settler

 | Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poland
Published online: 12 February 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.4.08wlo
This contribution aims to assess the possibility of filtering reflexive, i.e. intentional and strategic linguistic choices from the politic and highly conventionalised language of historical letters (see Wood 2009). As I would like to argue, an analysis of some “backstage” epistolary data could be helpful in tracing the former type of behaviour. The contribution presents a case study into the responses of the British government agency, the Colonial Office, to the letters from Mr William Parker, a Cape of Good Hope emigration scheme candidate (1819). The small set of letters addressed to Parker are weighed against a larger volume of the internal correspondence of the Colonial Office (1819–1823). Following Held (1989), the universal tension between the parties involved in communication, i.e. the clash between the needs of ego vs. alter, is used as a diagnostic of the orientation of (im)politeness norms and strategies in the analysed data. The results of this investigation are confirmed by means of a corpus tool, the UCREL semantic tagger, USAS (see Rayson 2009; Archer 2014). Its application shows that it is sensitive to those linguistic manifestations of the pragmatic space of a specific speech act property which is characteristic of the responses of the Colonial Office.
References (39)
Primary sources
Theal, George McCall. 1897–1905. Records of the Cape Colony (1793–1869). (Volumes 12, 13 and 15). London: Public Record Office.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
War and Colonial Department and Colonial Office: Cape of Good Hope (Cape Colony), Original correspondence. TNA. CO 48/41, 48/44, 48/45.
Secondary sources
Archer, Dawn. 2014. Exploring pragmatic phenomena in English historical texts using USAS: The possibilities and the problems. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker & Jukka Tuominen (eds.), Diachronic corpus pragmatics, 277–301. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banton, Mandy. 2008. Administering the Empire, 1801-1968: A Guide to the records of the Colonial Office in the National Archives of the UK. London: Institute of Historical Research/The National Archives of the UK.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bax, Marcel. 2010. Epistolary presentation rituals: Face-work, politeness, and ritual display in Early Modern Dutch letter-writing. In Jonathan Culpeper & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), Historical (im)politeness, 37–85. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. An evolutionary take on (im)politeness. In Marcel Bax & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), Understanding historical (im)politeness. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12(1/2). 255–282.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dickason, Graham Brian. 1973. Irish settlers to the Cape: History of the Clanwilliam 1820 settlers from Cork Harbour. Cape Town: A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Del Lungo Camiciotti, Gabriella. 2008. Two polite speech acts from a diachronic perspective: Aspects of the realisation of requesting and undertaking commitments in the nineteenth-century commercial ommunity. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Speech acts in the history of English, 115–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina. 2010. Building trust through (self-)appraisal in nineteenth-century business correspondence. In Päivi Pahta, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), Social roles and language practices in Late Modern English, 191–209. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The study of correspondence: Theoretical and methodological issues. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 13–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elspaβ, Stephan. 2012a. The use of private letters and diaries in sociolinguistic investigation. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 156–169. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. Between linguistic creativity and formulaic restriction: Cross-linguistic perspectives on nineteenth-century lower class writers’ private letters. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 45–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairman, Tony. 2003. Letters of the English labouring classes 1800–34 and the English language. In Marina Dossena & Charles Jones (eds), Insights into Late Modern English, 265–282. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2010. Changes in the meanings of politeness in eighteenth-century England: Discourse analysis and historical evidence. In Jonathan Culpeper & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), Historical (im)politeness, 87–116. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Held, Grudrun. 1989. On the role of maximization in verbal politeness. Multilingua 8(2–3). 167–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2010. ‘In curteisie was set ful muchel hir lest’: Politeness in Middle English. In Jonathan Culpeper & Dániel Z. Kádár (eds.), Historical (im)politeness, 175–200. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Changes in politeness cultures. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott, The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 422–433. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1. 67–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenkins, Brian. 1996. Henry Goulburn 1784–1856. A political biography. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z. 2013. Historical politeness. In Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kádár, Daniel Z. & Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laidlaw, Zoë. 2005. Colonial connections 1815–1845: Patronage, the information revolution and the colonial government. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1989. The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua 8(2/3). 101–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lester, Alan. 2001. Imperial networks: Creating identities in nineteenth–century South Africa and Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martineau, France. 2013. Written documents: What they tell us about linguistic usage. In 
Marijke J. van der Wal & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.), Touching the past: Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents, 129–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McArthur, Tom. 1981. Longman lexicon of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nash, Marjorie D. 1987. The Settler handbook: A New list of the 1820 Settlers. Diep River: 
Chameleon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevala, Minna. 2009. Referential terms and expressions in eighteenth-century letters: A case study on the Lunar Men of Birmigham. In Arja Nurmi, Minna Nevala & Minna Palander-Collin (eds.), The language of daily life in England (1400–1800), 75–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Politeness. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 419–450. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 1995. Constraints on politeness: The pragmatics of address formulae in Early English correspondence. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics. Pragmatic developments in the history of English, 541–601. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna. 2010. Correspondence. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavistainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 677–703. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayson, Paul. 2009. Wmatrix: A web-based corpus processing environment. Computing Dept., Lancaster University, [URL] (accessed 15 August 2013).
Taavitsainen, Irma & Andreas H. Jucker. 2010. Expressive speech acts and politeness in eighteenth-century English. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and change, 159–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Włodarczyk, Matylda. 2013a. British Colonial Office correspondence on the Cape Colony (1820–1821): Metatextual keywords vs. analytic categories. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 49(3). 399–428.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. 1820 settler petitions in the Cape Colony: Genre dynamics and materiality. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14(1). 45–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013c. Self-reference and ego involvement in the 1820 settler petition as a leaking genre. In Marijke J. van der Wal & Gijsbert J. Rutten (eds.), Touching the past: Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents, 201–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, Johanna. 2009. Structures and expectations: A systematic analysis of Margaret Paston’s formulaic and expressive language. In Jonathan Culpeper (ed.), Historical sociopragmatics. Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10(2). 187–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Dossena, Marina
2025. Networks, Coalitions and Language Change. In The New Cambridge History of the English Language, ► pp. 725 ff. DOI logo
Włodarczyk, Matylda
2020. “I am desired (…) to desire”. In Late Modern English [Studies in Language Companion Series, 214], ► pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
Włodarczyk, Matylda
2025. Orality in the History of English. In The New Cambridge History of the English Language, ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue