Cover not available

In:Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900: A sociolinguistic and comparative perspective
Edited by Gijsbert Rutten, Rik Vosters and Wim Vandenbussche
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 3] 2014
► pp. 1–18

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The interplay of language norms and usage patterns. Comparing the history of Dutch, English, French and German

ORCiD logo with link
Published online: 19 December 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.3.01rut
References (42)
References
Auer, Peter. 2005. Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard constellations. In Nicole Delbecque, Johan van der Auwera & Dirk Geeraerts (eds.), Perspectives on variation: Sociolinguistic, historical, comparative, 7–42. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Dialect vs. standard: A typology of scenarios in Europe. In Bernd Kortmann & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe, 485–500. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beal, Joan. 2004. English in modern times, 1700–1945. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. 2004. Languages and communities in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deumert, Ana & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.). 2003a. Germanic standardizations, past to present. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003b. Research directions in the study of language standardization. In Ana Deumert & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Germanic standardizations, past to present, 461–476. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina. 2012. The study of correspondence: Theoretical and methodological issues. In Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.), Letter writing in Late Modern Europe, 13–30. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds.). 2012. Letter writing in Late Modern Europe. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan. 2005. Sprachgeschichte von unten. Untersuchungen zum geschriebenen Alltagsdeutsch im 19. Jahrhundert. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. The use of private letters and diaries in sociolinguistic investigation. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy & Juan C. Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 156–169.Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan, Nils Langer, Joachim Sharloth & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.). 2007. Germanic language histories ‘from below’ (1700–2000). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.). 2007. Lower class language use in the 19th century. Special issue of Multilingua .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairman, Tony. 2007. Writing and ‘the standard’: England, 1795–1834. In Stephan Elspaß & Wim Vandenbussche (eds.), Lower class language use in the 19th century, 165–199. Special issue of Multilingua .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1966. Dialect, language, nation. American Anthropologist 68. 922–935. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond (ed.). 2010a. Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2012. Standards of English. Codified varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houdebine-Gravaud, Anne-Marie (ed.). 2002. L’Imaginaire linguistique. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joseph, John E. 1987. Eloquence and power: The rise of language standards and standard languages. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, Peter & Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 36. 15–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 1972. Einleitung. In Reinhart Koselleck, Werner Conze & Otto Brunner (eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, xiii-xxvii. Volume 1. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore & Nikolas Coupland (eds.). 2011. Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore and Stefan Grondelaers (eds.). 2013. Language (de)standardisation in Late Modern Europe: Experimental Studies. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leerssen, Joep. 2006. De bronnen van het vaderland: Taal, literatuur en de afbakening van Nederland 1806-1890. Nijmegen: Vantilt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. National thought in Europe: A cultural history. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina. 2012. English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. 2nd edition. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 1992. Linguistic variation and change: On the historical sociolinguistics of English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, James & Lesley Milroy. 2012 [1985]. Authority in language: Investigating standard English. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2012. Historical sociolinguistics: Origins, motivations, and paradigms. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy & Juan C. Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 22–40. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade. 2006. Standardisation. In Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds.), A history of the English language, 271–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nobels. Judith. 2013. (Extra)Ordinary letters: A view from below on seventeenth-century Dutch. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1982. Socio-historical linguistics: Its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert & Marijke van der Wal. 2014. Letters as loot. A sociolinguistic approach to seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Dutch. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salmons, Joseph. 2013. A history of German: What the past reveals about today’s language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, Tanja. 2013. Ongekend 18e-eeuws Nederlands: Taalvariatie in persoonlijke brieven. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandenbussche, Wim. 2007. Shared standardization factors in the history of sixteen Germanic languages. In Christian Fandrych & Reinier Salverda (eds.). Standard, Variation und Sprachwandel in germanischen Sprachen / Standard, variation and language change in Germanic languages, 25–36. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wal, Marijke van der. 2006. Onvoltooid verleden tijd. Witte vlekken in de taalgeschiedenis. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wal, Marijke van der & Gijsbert Rutten (eds.). 2013. Touching the past. Studies in the historical sociolinguistics of ego-documents. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2012. Language myths. In Juan M. Hernández-Campoy & J. Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 585–606.Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Dourdy, Laura-Maï
2021. Entend-on vraiment les paysans ? Ce que la variation syntaxique nous dit des représentations sociales dans la littérature des XV e et XVI e  siècles. Cahiers internationaux de sociolinguistique N° 18:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Rutten, Gijsbert
2016. Historicizing diaglossia. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20:1 ► pp. 6 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue