In:Spanish Socio-Historical Linguistics: Isolation and contact
Edited by Whitney Chappell and Bridget Drinka
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 12] 2021
► pp. 77–102
Language variation and change through an experimental lens
Contextual modulation in the use of the Progressive in three Spanish dialects
Published online: 13 May 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.12.c04pin
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.12.c04pin
Abstract
Spanish exhibits two markers to convey a
progressive meaning: the Simple Present and the
Present Progressive. The use of these markers is contextually
biased: the Simple Present requires contexts where speaker and
addressee share perceptual access to the situation
at issue, while the Present Progressive does not require such
support. We test this generalization through real-time
comprehension: the Simple Present marker in contexts
without shared perceptual access should elicit
slower reading times than within shared perceptual
access contexts. A self-paced reading study
(n = 176) in three different varieties of Spanish
(Mexican, Rioplatense, and Castilian) bears this prediction out.
Additionally, we find that the Mexican variety appears further
advanced in the Progressive-to-Imperfective
diachronic shift than its dialectal counterparts.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Communicative situations, context and linguistic markers
- 3.The meanings of the Progressive and the Imperfective
- 4.Spanish diachronic and synchronic facts
- 5.A questionnaire study on the event-in-progress reading
- 6.Real-time interpretation of an event-in-progress reading: An SPR study
- 7.Results
- 7.1Behavioral results
- 7.2Reading time results
- 8.Discussion
- 9.Conclusion
Notes References
References (39)
Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler & Ben Bolker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using
lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67. 1–48.
Bennett, Michael & Barbara Partee. 1972. Toward the logic of tense and aspect in
English. Santa Monica, California: System Development Corporation, ms.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2000. The progressive in Romance, as compared with
English. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 559–604. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah, Christine Gunlogson & Michael K. Tanenhaus. 2008. Addressees distinguish shared from private
information when interpreting questions during interactive
conversation. Cognition 107(3). 1122–1134.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in
the languages of the world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Clark, Herbert H. & Catherine R. Marshall. 1981. Definite reference and mutual
knowledge. In Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Weber & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Elements of discourse understanding, 10–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect
and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deo, Ashwini. 2009. Unifying the imperfective and the progressive:
partitions as quantificational domains. Linguistics and Philosophy 32. 475–521.
. 2015. The semantic and pragmatic underpinnings of
grammaticalization paths: the progressive to imperfective
shift. Semantics and Pragmatics 8. 1–52.
Dowty, David. 1977. Towards a semantic analysis of verb aspect and
the English ‘imperfective’ Progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 45–77.
Fafulas, Stephen. 2015. Progressive constructions in native-speaker and
adult-acquired Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 8(1). 85–133.
Fafulas, Stephen & Manuel Díaz-Campos. 2010. Variación morfosintáctica y lenguas en contacto:
las formas analíticas y sintéticas del presente progresivo
en el español monolingüe y bilingüe. Boletín de Filología 45(2). 71–89.
Ferreira, Fernanda & Charles Clifton Jr. 1986. The independence of syntactic
processing. Journal of Memory and Language 25(3). 348–368.
Fuchs, Martín, María Mercedes Piñango & Ashwini Deo. 2020a (in press). Operationalizing the role of context in language
variation: the role of perspective alignment in the Spanish
Imperfective domain. In Sebastian Löbner, Thomas Gamerschlag, Tobias Kalenscher, Markus Schrenk & Henk Zeevat (eds.), Concepts, frames, and cascades in semantics, cognition,
and ontology, chapter 10 (Language, Cognition and Mind 7). New York: Springer.
Fuchs, Martín, Ashwini Deo & María Mercedes Piñango. 2020b. The progressive-to imperfective shift:
Contextually determined variation in Rioplatense, Iberian,
and Mexican Altiplano Spanish. In Alfonso Morales-Front, Michael J. Ferreira, Ronald P. Leow & Cristina Sanz (eds.), Hispanic linguistics: Current issues and new
directions, 119–136. Amsterdam: Johns Benjamins.
Gopnik, Alison. 1993. How we know our minds: The illusion of
first-person knowledge of intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16. 1–15.
Hanna, Joy. E. & Michael K. Tanenhaus. 2004. Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a
collaborative task: Evidence from eye
movements. Cognitive Science 28(1). 105–115.
Hothorn, Torsten, Frank Bretz & Peter Westfall. 2008. Simultaneous inference in General Parametric
Models. Biometrical Journal 50. 346–363.
Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–563. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, David. 1980. Index, context, and content. In Stig Kanger & Sven Öhman (eds.), Philosophy and grammar, 79–100. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Marchand, Hans. 1955. On a question of aspect: A comparison between the
progressive form in English and that in Italian and
Spanish. Studia Linguistica 9. 45–52.
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón. 1962. Sevilla frente a Madrid. Algunas precisiones
sobre el español de América. Miscelánea homenaje a André Martinet: Estructuralismo e
Historia, 99–165. La Laguna: Universidad de La Laguna.
Nadig, Aparna S. & Julie C. Sedivy. 2002. Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in
children’s on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science 13(4). 329–336.
Premack, David & Guy Woodruff. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of
mind? Brain and Behavioral Sciences 4. 515–526.
R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical
computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna,
Austria.
Schreier, Daniel. 2009. Language in isolation, and its implications for
variation and change. Language and Linguistic Compass 3(2). 682–699.
Sedano, Mercedes. 2000. La perífrasis de gerundio en Caracas y otras
ciudades hispanohablantes. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 48(2). 253–274.
Stalnaker, Robert. 1978. Assertion. In Peter Cole (ed.), Pragmatics, 315–332. New York: New York Academic Press.
Torres Cacoullos, Rena. 2000. Grammaticization, synchronic variation, and language
contact. A study of Spanish Progressive -ndo
constructions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Johns Benjamins.
. 2009. Variation and grammaticisation: The emergence of
an aspectual opposition. In Stavroula Tsiplakou, Marilena Karyolemou & Pavlos Pavou (eds.), Studies in language variation: European perspectives II
(ICLaVE 4), 215–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2012. Grammaticalization through inherent variability:
The development of a progressive in Spanish. Studies in Language 36. 73–122.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Piñango, María Mercedes & Martín Fuchs
2023. Cognitive underpinnings of the meaning of Spanish estar
. Spanish in Context 20:2 ► pp. 367 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
