Cover not available

In:Keeping in Touch: Emigrant letters across the English-speaking world
Edited by Raymond Hickey
[Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 10] 2019
► pp. 43–66

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 3
‘I hope you will excuse my bad writing’

Shall vs. will in the 1830s Petworth Emigration to Canada Corpus (PECC)

 | University of British Columbia
Published online: 28 November 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ahs.10.03dol
This chapter introduces a new resource, the Petworth Emigration to Canada Corpus (PECC), which consists of some 90,000 words of letters from Southern English emigrants to Canada in the 1830s. Empirically, the chapter addresses the change from first person shall to will in a multi-variety comparison with logistic regression modelling that. Results suggest linguistic “drift” antedates mass literacy which is therefore more unlikely to be responsible for the change (as suggested in McCafferty and Amador-Moreno 2014) than hitherto assumed. It also addresses the degree of orality of the Petworth letters and suggests a conceptual distinction between and differential treatment of short-distance and long-distance letter data. Finally, CanE is accessed as more innovative in the use of first person will than has traditionally been assumed.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Petworth emigration: The background
  • 3.The Petworth Emigration to Canada Corpus (PEEC)
    • 3.1A sample letter
    • 3.2High-quality edition corpora, letter corpora and “big corpus linguistics”
    • 3.3The manuscript route
  • 4.Variables
    • 4.1 Shall and will as a diagnostic
    • 4.2First person shall vs. will in PECC
    • 4.3Transatlantic stylistics and epistolary features? Long vs. short transmission routes as a new independent variable in letter data
      • 4.3.1An ocean-travelling letter style?
      • 4.3.2Dialect contact or colloquialization?
      • 4.3.3Logistic regression testing
      • 4.3.4Clause type
      • 4.3.5Verb type
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Appendix
  • References
References (56)
References
Auer, Anita, Daniel Schreier and Richard J. Watts (eds.) 2015. Letter Writing and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Anita. 2015. Stylistic variation. In Auer, Schreier and Watts (eds.), 133–155.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, Frances. 2004. “Heaving this importunity”: The survival of opening formulas in letters in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Historical Sociolingistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics 4, (accessed Jan 2019).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barton, H. Arnold. 1975. Letters from the Promised Land: Swedes in America, 1840-1914. N. pl.: University of Minnesota Press and Swedish Pioneer Historical Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C. 2004. English in Modern Times 1700-1945. London: Arnold Hodder.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonness, Dania Jovana. 2016. ‘There is a great many Irish Settlers here’: Exploring Irish English diachronically using emigrant letters in the Corpus of Irish English Correspondence (CORIECOR). Ph.D dissertation. Bergen: University of Bergen.
Bridge, Kathryn. 2017. In the name of education. In Michelle van der Merwe (ed.) The Language of Family: stories of bonds and belonging, 23–28. Victoria, BC: Royal BC Museum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Rena Torres Cacoullos. 2015. Grammaticalization and variation of will and shall in Shakespeare’s comedies. In Torres Cacoullos, Dion and Lapierre (eds.), 131–145.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Wendy and Mary McDougall Maude (eds.) 2000. Assisting Emigration to Upper Canada: the Petworth Project, 1832-1837. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Wendy, Sheila Haines, Mary McDougall Maude (eds) 2000. English Immigrant Voices: labourers’ letters from Upper Canada in the 1830s. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1998. English: Canadian varieties. In: John Edwards (ed.). Language in Canada. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 252–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. and Peter Trudgill. 1991. Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 1982. Variation in an English Dialect: a Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2010. The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400 million words, 1810-2009. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dollinger, Stefan. 2004. Historical corpus compilation and ‘philological computing’ vs. ‘philological outsourcing’: a LModE test case. VIEWS. 13(2): 3–23. [URL] (9 June 2017).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. The modal auxiliaries HAVE TO and MUST in the Corpus of Early Ontario English: gradience and colonial lag. Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 51(2+3): 287–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. The importance of demography for the study of historical Canadian English: three examples from the Corpus of Early Ontario English. In: Javier Pérez-Guerra, Dolores González-Álvarez, Jorge L. Bueno-Alonso and Esperanza Rama-Martínez (eds) ‘Of varying language and opposing creed’: New Insights into Late Modern English, 105–136. Bern: Peter Lang (= Linguistic Insights, 28).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008a. Colonial variation in the Late Modern English business letter: ‘periphery and core’ or ‘random variation’?. In: Marina Dossena and Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds) Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence: methodology and data, 257–287. Bern: Peter Lang (= Linguistic Insights, 76).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008b. New-Dialect Formation in Canada: evidence from the English modal auxiliaries. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins (Studies in Language Companion Series, 97), Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Written sources of Canadian English: Phonetic Reconstruction and the Low-Back Vowel Merger. In: Varieties of English in Writing: The Written Word as Linguistic Evidence, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 197–222. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Canadian English: a conservative variety? Zeitschrift für Kanada-Studien [Journal of Canadian Studies, Germany] 35: 25–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. On the regrettable dichotomy between philology and linguistics: historical lexicography and historical linguistics as test cases. In Don Chapman, Colette Moore and Miranda Wilcox (eds) Studies in the History of English VII: generalizing vs. particularizing methodologies in historical linguistic analysis, 61–89. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina. 2016. Advice to prospectors (and others): knowledge dissemination, power and persuasion in Late Modern English emigrants’ guides and correspondence. In Cinzia Russi (ed.) Current Trends in Historical Sociolinguistics 67–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina and Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds). 2008. Studies in Late Modern English Correspondence: Methodology and Data. Berne: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elliott, Bruce S., David A. Gerber and Suzanne M. Sinke (eds.) 2006. Letters Across Borders: the epistolary practices of international migrants. New York: Palgrave Macmillan published in association with the Carleton Centre for the History of Migration. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth and Wim Vandenbussche (eds.). 2007. Germanic Language Histories ‘from Below’ (1700–2000). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairman, Tony. 2015. Language in print and handwriting, In: Auer, Scheier and Watts, 53–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, David. 2006. Irish emigration and the art of letter-writing. In Letters across Broders: the epistolary practices of international migrants, ed. by Bruce S. Elliott, David A. Gerber and Suzanne M. Sinke, 97–106. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fries, Charles C. 1925. The periphrastic future with shall and will in Modern English. PMLA 40: 963–1024. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giltrow, Janet. 2009. ‘Curious gentlemen’: the Hudson’s Bay Company and the Royal Society, business and science in the eighteenth century. In: Doreen Starke-Meyerring, Anthony Paré, Natasha Artemeva, Miriam Horne, and Larissa Yousoubova (eds) Writing in Knowledge Societies, West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gotti, Maurizio. 2003. Pragmatic uses of shall and will for future time reference in Early Modern English. In English Modality in Context: diachronic perspectives, 108–170. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Havinga, Anna D. 2018. Invisibilising Austrian German: on the effect of linguistic prescriptions and educational reforms on writing practices in 18th-century Austria. Berlin: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Tim, Robert Shoemaker, Clive Emsley, Sharon Howard and Jamie McLaughlin, (eds) 2012. The Old Bailey Proceedings Online, 1674–1913 ([URL], version 7.0, 24 March 2012).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huber, Magnus, Nissel, Magnus, Maiwald, Patrick, Widlitzki, Bianca (eds.) 2012. The Old Bailey Corpus: spoken English in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. [URL], [30 June 2017].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja. 1991. Variation in Diachrony, with early American English in Focus: studies on CAN/MAY and SHALL/WILL. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laitinen, Mikko. 2015. Early nineteenth-century pauper letters. In: Auer, Schreier and Watts (eds.), 185–201.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Christian (1997). The spread of the going-to-future in written English: a corpus-based investigation into language change in progress. In Language History and Linguistic Modelling. A Festschrift for Jacek Fisiak on his 60th Birthday, ed. by Raymond Hickey, & Stanislaw Puppel, 1537–1543. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCafferty, Kevin and Carolina P. Amador-Moreno. 2014. ‘[The Irish] find much difficulty in these auxiliaries … putting will for shall with the first person’: the decline of first-person shall in Ireland, 1760–1890. English Language and Linguistics 18(3): 407–429. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend and Rakesh M. Bhatt. 2008. World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael. 1995. The linguistic value of Ulster emigrant letters. Ulster Folklife 41: 26–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. A tale of two Georges: the language of Irish Indian traders in colonial North America. In Jeffrey Kallen (ed.) Focus on Ireland, 227–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael, Janet M. Fuller and Sharon DeMarse. 1993. ‘The black men has wieves and Sweet harts [and third person plural –s] Jes like the white men’: evidence from verbal –s from written documents on nineteenth-century African American speech. Language Variation and Change 5: 335–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Percy, Carol. 2006. Writing from the asylum: Martha Shakespear Lloyd at the linguistic limits of eighteenth-century femininity. Women’s Writing 13(1): 83–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pietsch, Lukas 2015. Archaism and dialect in Irish emigrant letters. In: Auer, Schreier and Watts (eds.), 223–239.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reuter, David. M. 2017. Newspapers, Politics, and Canadian English: a corpus-based analysis of selected linguistic variables in early nineteenth-century Ontario newspapers. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2002. Investigating variation and change in written documents. In Peter Trudgill, J. K. Chambers and Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell. 67–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taglicht, J. 1970. The genesis of the conventional rules for the use of. shall and will English Studies 51: 193–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tieken-Boon van Ostad, Ingrid, Ingrid. 1985. ‘I will be drowned and no man shall save me’: the conventional rules for shall and will in eighteenth-century English grammars. English Studies 66(2): 123–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena, Nathalie Dion and André Lapierre (eds.) 2015. Linguistic Variation: confronting fact and theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter 2004. New Dialect Formation: The Inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter and J. K. Chambers (eds.) 1991 Dialects of English: studies in grammatical variation. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Bergen, Linda and David Denison. 2007. A corpus of late eighteenth-century prose. In Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan and Hermann Moisl (eds) Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora: Vol. 2, diachronic databases, 228–246. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Merwe, Michelle (ed.). 2017. The Language of Family: stories of bonds and belonging. Victoria, BC: Royal BC Museum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard. 2015. Setting the scene: letters, standards and historical sociolinguistics. In: Auer, Schreier and Watts (eds), 1–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Iten, Mark
2024.  Linguistic prescriptivism and the language of the laboring poor: The case of will/shall . Studia Neophilologica 96:3 ► pp. 817 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue