In:Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms
Edited by Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Tarja Nikula and Ute Smit
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 7] 2010
► pp. 169–190
The CLIL differential
Comparing the writing of CLIL and non-CLIL students in higher colleges of technology
Published online: 15 December 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.7.09jex
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.7.09jex
This chapter examines the effects of CLIL provision on different aspects of written language competence in order to determine which of these areas profit more and which are possibly unaffected by the experience of subject matter teaching in a foreign language. For this purpose we analysed the written work of students who followed either a traditional EFL curriculum or enjoyed additional CLIL provision. The data were obtained in a double case study at two higher technical colleges in Austria where students were asked to complete a free writing task. The bottom line of the analysis shows the CLIL students clearly ahead of their EFL-only peers on the basis of overall scores, but on closer inspection results tell a more complex story: in the area of lexico-grammar the CLIL students show significant advantages throughout, as they do in vocabulary range and orthographic correctness. On the level of discourse competence and textual organization, however, differences are difficult to discern with the general competence level in this area leaving a great deal of room for improvement. Several explanations for these results suggest themselves.
Cited by (38)
Cited by 38 other publications
Vraciu, Alexandra & Anna Marsol
Jafarigohar, Manoochehr, Hoda Divsar & Parisa Etemad
Wagner, Manuela & Dominique Galvez
Castellano-Risco, Irene
Martí, Otilia & Irene Guzmán-Alcón
2024. Learner pragmatics in English-medium‑instruction courses at university. Applied Pragmatics 6:2 ► pp. 168 ff.
Pittas, Evdokia & Leah Tompkins
Roquet Pugès, Helena, Noelia Navarro Gil & Florentina Nicolás-Conesa
2024. The impact of adjunct instruction on EFL academic writing at university. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 12:2 ► pp. 162 ff.
Del Mar Sánchez-Pérez, María
Hendrikx, Isa & Kristel Van Goethem
Lee , Jang Ho, Hansol Lee & Yuen Yi Lo
Llinares, Ana & Nashwa Nashaat-Sobhy
Vinuesa Benítez, Virginia
Zhu, Yan, Yue Liu, Nana Yang & Jonathan Newton
Li, Dongying & Lian Zhang
Roussel, Stéphanie, André Tricot & John Sweller
Graham, Keith M. & Zohreh R. Eslami
Montaner-Villalba, Salvador
Querol Julián, Mercedes & Javier Díez Ramírez
Möller, Verena
Van Mensel, Luk, Amélie Bulon, Isa Hendrikx, Fanny Meunier & Kristel Van Goethem
2020. Effects of input on L2 writing in English and Dutch. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 8:2 ► pp. 173 ff.
Vidal, Karina & Scott Jarvis
Whittaker, Rachel & Anne McCabe
2020. Writing on history in a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) context. In Writing and Language Learning [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 56], ► pp. 309 ff.
Hendrikx, Isa, Kristel Van Goethem & Stefanie Wulff
2019. Intensifying constructions in French-speaking L2 learners of English and Dutch. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Pérez, María del Mar Sánchez & María Enriqueta Cortés de los Ríos
Schmidt-Unterberger, Barbara
Azkarai, Agurtzane & Ainara Imaz Agirre
Tragant, Elsa, Anna Marsol, Raquel Serrano & Àngels Llanes
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane & Tarja Nikula
Pladevall-Ballester, Elisabet
Pérez-Vidal, Carmen & Helena Roquet
Roquet, Helena & Carmen Pérez-Vidal
Ruiz de Zarobe, Yolanda
Aguilar, Marta & Carmen Muñoz
Pérez-Cañado, María Luisa
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane
2017.
Introduction to part III. In Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 47], ► pp. 167 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
