In:Digital Social Reading and Second Language Learning and Teaching:
Edited by Joshua J. Thoms and Kristen Michelson
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 21] 2024
► pp. 48–73
Chapter 3Critical historical literacy in world languages through digital
social reading
Published online: 17 October 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.21.03lyn
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.21.03lyn
Abstract
This exploratory study reports on digital social reading
(DSR) interactions in an advanced collegiate German course. Using a
stancetaking perspective, we examine how learners linguistically
conceptualize, discuss, and draw on historical thinking strategies
of continuity and change to evaluate historical, social, and
cultural patterns in texts and how their interactions mediate
peer-to-peer learning. Preliminary findings suggest that DSR can
mediate peer-to-peer interaction in a critical content-based course.
We conclude with suggestions for future research and teaching. The
results of this study indicate that an interactional analysis of
stancetaking can help researchers and instructors understand how
such peer-to-peer mediation of disciplinary language and thinking
approaches emerges in DSR.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Literature review
- DSR in world languages
- Stancetaking in digital social reading
- Historical literacy in a world language
- Description of the course
- The design of the study
- Digital social reading in Perusall
- Methods
- Results and analysis
- Beginning to read history and coming to terms with the present
- Guided reading questions as mediation
- Becoming an expert through collaboration
- Discussion
- Limitations and future directions
Notes References
References (62)
Adams, B., & Wilson, N. (2020). Building
community in asynchronous online higher education courses
through collaborative
annotation. Journal of
Educational Technology
Systems, 49(2), 250–261.
Allen, H., & Paesani, K. (2010). Exploring
the feasibility of a pedagogy of multiliteracies in
introductory foreign language
courses. L2
Journal, 2(1), 119–142.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In M. Holquist & C. Emerson (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.) (pp. 60-102). University of Texas Press.
Barton, K. (2001). A
sociocultural perspective on children’s understanding of
historical change: Comparative findings from Northern
Ireland and the United
States. American Educational
Research
Journal, 38(4), 881–913.
Blyth, C. (2014). Exploring
the affordances of digital social reading for L2 literacy:
The case of
eComma. In J. Pettes Guikema & L. Williams (Eds.), Digital
literacies in foreign and second language
education (pp. 201–226). Calico.
Chen, C. M., & Chen, F. Y. (2014). Enhancing digital reading performance with a collaborative reading annotation system. Computers & Education, 77, 67-81.
Chen, I. J., & Chen, W. C. (2016). Perceived usefulness of a strategy-based peer annotation system for improving academic reading comprehension. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 27(1), 27-51.
Chen, C., Chen, L., & Horng, W. (2021). A
collaborative reading annotation system with formative
assessment and feedback mechanisms to promote digital
reading
performance. Interactive
Learning
Environments, 29(5), 848–865.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009) ‘Multiliteracies’:
New literacies, new
learning. Pedagogies: An
International
Journal, 4(3), 164–195.
Donato, R., & MacCormick, D. (1994). A
sociocultural perspective on language learning strategies:
The role of mediation. The
Modern Language
Journal, 78(4), 453–464.
Du Bois, J. (2007). The
stance
triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking
in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, and
interaction (pp. 139–182). John Benjamins.
El-Tayeb, F. (2016). Undeutsch. Die Konstruktion des Anderen inderpostmigrantischen Gesellschaft. Transcript Verlag.
Eryilmaz, E., Chiu, M., Thoms, B., Mary, J., & Kim, R. (2014). Design
and evaluation of instructor-based and peer-oriented
attention guidance functionalities in an open source
anchored discussion
system. Computers &
Education, 71, 303–321.
Fairclough, N. (1999). Global capitalism and critical awareness of language. Language Awareness, 8(2), 71–83.
Gao, F. (2013). A case study of using a social annotation tool to support collaboratively learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 76-83.
Geisler, M., Kramsch, C., McGinnis, S., Patrikis, P., Pratt, M., Ryding, K., & Saussy, H. (2007). Foreign
languages and higher education: New structures for a changed
world, MLA Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign
Languages. Profession 2007, 234–245. [URL]
Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2007). The social construction of the cultural mind: Imitative learning as a mechanism of human pedagogy. In P. Hauf & F. Försterling (Eds.), Making minds. The shaping of human minds through social context (pp. 241–257). John Benjamins.
Grice, H. (1975). Logic
and
conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Studies
in syntax and semantics 3: Speech
acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Jaffe, A. (2009). Introduction:
The sociolinguistics of
stance. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance:
Sociolinguistic
perspectives (pp. 3–28). Oxford University Press.
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing
statement: Linguistics and
poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.) Style
in
Language (pp. 350–377). The MIT Press.
Jan, J., Chen, C., & Huang, P. (2016). Enhancement
of digital reading performance by using a novel web-based
collaborative reading annotation system with two quality
annotation filtering
mechanisms. International
Journal of Human-computer
Studies, 86, 81–93.
Jay, L., & Reisman, A. (2019). Teaching
change and continuity with historical
analogies. Social Studies
Research and
Practice, 14(1), 98–104.
(2007). Linking
identity and dialect through
stancetaking. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking
in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation,
interaction (pp. 49–67). John Benjamins.
Kärkkäinen, E. (2006). Stance
taking in conversation: From subjectivity to
intersubjectivity. Text &
Talk, 26(6), 699–731.
Kiesling, S. (2009). Style
as stance: Stance as the explanation for patterns of
sociolinguistic
variation. In A. Jaffe (Ed.). Stance:
Sociolinguistic
perspectives (pp. 171–195). Oxford Academic.
Kiesling, S., Pavalanathan, U., Fitzpatrick, J., Han, X., & Eisenstein, J. (2018). Interactional
stancetaking in online
forums. Computational
Linguistics, 44(4), 683–718.
Kubota, R. (2012). Memories
of war: Exploring victim-victimizer perspectives in critical
content-based instruction in
Japanese. L2
Journal, 4(1), 37–57.
(2016). Critical
content-based instruction in the foreign language classroom:
Critical issues for
implementation. In L. Cammarata (Ed.), Content-based
foreign language teaching: Curriculum and pedagogy for
developing advanced thinking and literacy
skills (pp. 192–211). Routledge.
Lantolf, J. (2006). Sociocultural
theory and l2: State of the
art. Studies in Second
Language
Acquisition, 28(1), 67–109.
Lantolf, J., Thorne, S., & Poehner, M. (2014). Sociocultural
theory and second language
development. In B. Vanpatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories
in second language acquisition: An
introduction (pp. 207–226). Routledge.
Law, J., Barny, D., & Poulin, R. (2020). Patterns
of peer interaction in multimodal L2 digital social
reading. Language Learning
&
Technology, 24(2), 70–85. [URL]
Lempert, M. (2008). The poetics of stance: Text-metricality, epistemicity, interaction. Language in Society, 37(4), 569–592.
Lévesque, S. (2008). Historical
thinking: Educating students for the 21st
century. University of Toronto Press.
(2011). What
it means to think
historically. In P. Clark (Ed.), New
possibilities for the past: Shaping history education in
Canada. University of British Columbia Press.
Lévesque, S., & Clark, P. (2018). Historical thinking: Definitions and educational applications. The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning, 117-148.
Lin, L. (1994). Language
of and in the classroom: Constructing the patterns of social
life. Linguistics and
Education, 5, 367–409.
Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2018). Ten
years after the MLA report: What has changed in foreign
language departments? ADFL
Bulletin, 44(2), 116–120.
New London
Group. (1996). A
pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social
futures. Harvard Educational
Review, 66(1), 60–92.
Paesani, K., & Menke, M. (2023). Literacies in language education: A guide for teachers and teacher educators. Georgetown University Press.
Paesani, K. W., Allen, H. W., & Dupuy, B., (2016). A multiliteracies framework for collegiate foreign language teaching. Pearson.
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language
processing and second language development: Processability
theory. John Benjamins.
Plevinski, J., Weible, J., & DeSchryver, M. (2017). Anchored
annotation to support collaborative knowledge
construction. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Reisman, A. (2015). Entering
the historical problem space: Whole-class text-based
discussion in history
class. Teachers College
Record, 117(2), 1–44.
Seixas, P. (2017). A
model of historical
thinking. Educational
Philosophy and
Theory, 49(6), 593–605.
Silverstein, M. (1998). The
improvisational performance of culture in realtime
discursive
practice. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Creativity
in
performance (pp. 265–312). Ablex.
(1989). Talking voices : repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Thoms, J., & Poole, F. (2018). Exploring
digital literacy practices via L2 social
reading. L2
Journal, 10(2), pp. 36–61.
Thoms, J., Sung, K., & Poole, F. (2017). Investigating
the linguistic and pedagogical affordances of an L2 open
reading environment via eComma: An exploratory study in a
Chinese language
course. System, 69, pp. 38–53.
Tocaimaza-Hatch, C., & Bloom, M. (2019). Promoting
intercultural thinking and reflection through U.S.
history. Foreign Language
Annals, 52(3), 507–528.
Urban, G. (1991). Grammatical
parallelism and
thought. In J. Wilce (Ed.), A
discourse-centered approach to culture: Native South
American myths and
rituals (pp. 29–57). University of Texas Press.
van der Pol, J., Admiraal, W., & Simons, P. (2006). The
affordance of anchored discussion for the collaborative
processing of academic
texts. Computer-Supported
Collaborative
Learning, 1, 339–357.
Yang, X., Yu, S., & Sun, Z. (2013). The effect of collaborative annotation on Chinese reading level in primary schools in China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 95-111.
