In:Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching: Historical perspectives
Edited by Richard Smith and Tim Giesler
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 20] 2023
► pp. 180–198
Chapter 10Curriculum innovation
through concept borrowing
The case of “learner autonomy” in English language education in Chinese universities (1978–2007)
Published online: 27 June 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.20.10pu
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.20.10pu
Abstract
This chapter analyses how the concept of learner
autonomy was incorporated into the national college English
curricula in China between 1978 and 2007. Adopting Quentin Skinner’s
intentionalist approach, it examines this concept in relation to
linguistic convention and practical context in China, discussing its
meaning in the Chinese context and the intentionality of promoting
this concept for curriculum innovation. The findings reveal that
learner autonomy was taken to refer mainly to students’ ability to
learn on their own outside the classroom. The importation of this
concept has pushed teachers and policy makers to attend to students’
individual needs, but it has also manipulated dominant academic and
pedagogical discourse in China in a way that steered curriculum
innovation away from its original aim.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Learner autonomy: A borrowed concept
- Analysing concept borrowing: An intentionalist approach
- Defining key terms
- Analytical procedure
- The concept of learner autonomy in the Chinese context: Meaning and intentionality
- Recovery from the Cultural Revolution (1978–1986)
- Stable development (1987–2001)
- Educational reform (2002–2007)
- From 2007 onwards …
- Conclusion and implications
Acknowledgement Note References
References (47)
Primary sources
Cao, R. (2000). Jiaqiang daxue yingyu jiaoxue
zhuanyehua, zou xuexizhe zizhu
zhilu [Professionalization of college English education
through developing learner
autonomy]. Journal of
Beijing Forestry
University, (Sup.), 100–102.
Curriculum
Design Group
(CDG) (1986). College
English curriculum (for undergraduates in arts and
Science). Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Dong, L. (2002). 21 shiji daxue yingyu jiaoxue gaige
de zhanwang [Perspective for college English education
in the 21st
century]. Journal of
Shaanxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social
Sciences
Edition), 31(Sup.), 296–299.
He, L. (2003). Zizhu xuexi jiqi nengli de
peiyang [The ability for autonomous learning and
its development]. Foreign
Language Teaching and
Research, 7, 287–289.
Hua, W. (2001). Zizhu xuexi zhongxin – yizhong
xinxing de yuyan xuexi
huanjing (Self-access centres: A new environment for
language learning). Foreign
Language
World, 5, 41–45.
Jiang, C., & Tian, H. (2003). Daxue yingyu jiaoxue mianlin de yali
he gaige [Challenges to the College English
education reform]. Journal
of Shaanxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social
Sciences
Edition), 32(Sup.), 29–32.
Lan, C., & Zeng, J. (2004). Dui peiyang woguo waiyu xuexizhe
xuexi zizhuxing de
sikao [Developing learner autonomy among Chinese foreign
language learners]. Foreign
Language
World, 4, 24–30.
Li, H. (1998). Xuexi zihuxing yu zhongguo yingyu
jiaoxue [Autonomy in learning and English teaching
in China]. Foreign
Languages and Their
Teaching, 10, 24–26.
Li, S. (2003). Daxue yingyu jiaoxue gaige huhuan
guannian gengxin [College English education reform calls for
changes in educational
beliefs]. Foreign Language
Teaching and
Research, 3, 228–230.
Ministry of
Education
(MOE) (2007). College
English Curriculum
Requirements. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Shi, B. (2003). Lengjing de jinxing daxue yingyu
jiaoxue gaige [Reforming college English education with
rationality]. Foreign
Language Teaching and
Research, 5, 384–385.
Secondary sources
Esch, E. (2009). Crash
or clash? Autonomy 10 years
on. In R. Pemberton, S. Toogood, & A. Barfield (Eds.), Maintaining
control: Autonomy and language
learning (pp. 27–44). Hong Kong University Press.
Gremmo, M.-J., & Riley, P. (1995). Autonomy,
self-direction and self access in language teaching and
learning: The history of an
idea. System, 23(2), 151–164.
Ha, P. L., McPherrson, P., & Van Que, P. (2011). English
language teachers as moral guides in Vietnam and China:
Maintaining and re-traditionalizing
morality. In J. Ryan (Ed.) Education
reform in China: Changing concepts, contexts and
practices (pp. 132–157). Routledge.
Howlett, J. & McDonald, P. J. (2011). Quentin
Skinner, intentionality and the history of
education. Paedagogica
Historica: International Journal of the History of
Education, 47(3), 415–433.
Hu, G. (2002). Potential
cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of
communicative language teaching in
China. Language, Culture
and
Curriculum, 15(2), 93–105.
Kormos, J., & Csizér, K. (2014). The
interaction of motivation, self-regulation strategies,
and autonomous learning behavior in different learner
groups. TESOL
Quarterly, 48(2), 275–299.
Lieberman, R. C. (2002). Ideas,
institutions, and political order: Explaining political
change. American
Political Science
Review, 96(4), 697–712.
(2009). Language
learner autonomy and the European Language Portfolio:
Two L2 English
examples. Language
Teaching, 42(2), 222–233.
Little, D., & Singleton, D. (1989). Setting
the context: Language learning, self-instruction and
autonomy. In D. Little (Ed.), Self-access
systems for language
learning (pp. 1–31). Authentik.
Liu, X. (2013). Lun daxue yingyu jiaoxue sibian
nengli peiyang moshi
jiangou [Constructing an educational model for
cultivating critical thinking skills in university
English courses]. Foreign
Language
World, (5), 59–66.
Lu, Z. (2018). Chuangxinxing waiyu rencai peiyang de
linian yu shijian [Innovative education for cultivating
foreign language talents: theory and
practice]. Foreign Language
Education, 39(1), 50–54.
Oxford, R. L. (2015). Expanded
perspectives on autonomous
learners. Innovation in
Language Learning and
Teaching, 9(1), 58–71.
Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes
of policy borrowing in education: Some explanatory and
analytical
devices. Comparative
Education, 39(4), 451–461.
Pu, S. (2020). Learner
autonomy in the national English language curricula for
Chinese universities 1978–2007: A historical
analysis. Chinese Journal
of Applied
Linguistics 43(1): 83–104.
Qu, X., Zhang, F., & Wang, X. (2013). ‘Bajian shiyan ban’ de daxue waiyu
peiyang moshi tansuo he jiaoxue xiaoguo
yanjiu [Exploring the elite program of college English teaching: Model and effectiveness]. Foreign
Languages in
China, 10(5), 13–18.
Schriewer, J. (2012). Meaning
constellations in the world
society. Comparative
Education, 48(4), 411–422.
Skinner, Q. (1978). The
foundations of modern political
thought (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Tan, C. (2015). Education
policy borrowing and cultural scripts for teaching in
China. Comparative
Education, 51(2), 196–211.
Tu, G., Hu, D., & Fan, L. (2016). Chuancheng, fazhan, and chuangxin:
Daxue yingyu kecheng shezhi xintixi goujian zhi
sikao [Inheritance, development and innovation: Reflections on
the construction of new college English curriculum
setting system]. Foreign
Languages in
China, 13(6), 4–9.
Tully, J. (1988). The
pen is a mighty sword: Quentin Skinner’s analysis of
politics. In J. Tully (Ed.), Meaning
and context: Quentin Skinner and his
critics (pp. 7–25). Polity Press.
Wang, S., Wu, D., Liu, C., Jia, G., Zhao, W., Jin, Y., … Xin, H. (2009). Daxue yingyu jiaoyu fazhan
yanjiu [Research on the development of college
English language
education]. In W. Dai & W. Hu (Eds.), Development
of Chinese foreign language education:
1949–2009 (pp. 445–570). Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Zhang, W., Zhang, W., & Liu, M. (2015). Yanjiuxing daxue yingyu jiaoyu tixi
de goujian yu tansuo: Yi Tsinghua daxue
weili [Constructing an integrated English education system at
a Chinese research-oriented university: the case of
Tsinghua
University]. Modern Foreign
Languages, 38(1), 93–101.
