Cover not available

In:Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing
Edited by Pilar Mur-Dueñas and Jolanta Šinkūnienė
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 18] 2018
► pp. 129–149

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Chapter 6
Chinese writers of English RAs as creators of a research space in a national context

A diachronic study

 | Nanjing University
Published online: 6 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.06che
Abstract
Based on Swales’ (1990, 2004) CARS model, this study examines 95 research articles (RAs) published by Chinese English-language writers doing Applied Linguistics across three periods of time to find out whether and to what extent they move over time towards the conventional construction of the identity as creators of a research space in the introductory part of their RAs published in a national context. The findings confirm the occurrence of the diachronic change, which is ascribed to the accrued influence of international academic conventions on Chinese English-language writers. Hopefully, this study can help improve the teaching and writing of RA Introductions for the purposes of English-language international publication and enrich existing research on identity construction in academic discourse.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Research background
    • 2.1Defining CARS
    • 2.2Research on the CARS model of RA Introductions
    • 2.3Research on identity construction in academic writing
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Data collection
    • 3.2Data analysis
  • 4.Results of the study
    • 4.1Chinese writers’ concurrent construction of the three sub-identities across different periods
    • 4.2Chinese writers’ construction of the three sub-identities across different periods
    • 4.3The ways of Chinese writers’ construction of the three sub-identities across different periods
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (31)
References
Baker, W. (2010). Contrastive rhetoric: Reaching to intercultural rhetoric. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(3), 299–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bennett, K. (2007). Epistemicide! The tale of a predatory discourse. Translator, 13(2), 151–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2014). The semiperiphery of academic writing. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgess, S. (2002). Packed houses and intimate gatherings: Audience and rhetorical structure. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 196–215). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgess, A., & Ivanic, R. (2010). Writing and being written: Issues of identity across timescales. Written Communication, 27(2), 228–255. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Connor, U. (2004). Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(4), 291–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
del Saz Rubio, M. M. (2011). A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of agricultural sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 30(4), 258–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fakhri, A. (2004). Rhetorical properties of Arabic research article introductions. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(6), 1119–1138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farneste, M. (2015). Moves in the introduction sections of applied linguistics research articles. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 5, 27–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forestier, K. (1998). Asian crisis spurs lesson in learning. South China Morning Post, 11 August.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091–1112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 269–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lim, J. M. (2012). How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers’ rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(3), 229–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Littlewood, W. (2000). Do Asian students really want to listen and obey? ELT Journal, 54, 31–36 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorés-Sanz, R. (2016). ELF in the making? simplification and hybridity in abstract writing. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 5(1), 53–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mur-Dueñas, P. (2014). ‘The main contribution of this study is…’: An analysis of statements of contribution in English published research articles and L2 manuscripts. Journal of Writing Research, 5, 271–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Promotional strategies in academic writing: Statements of contribution in Spanish and ELF research articles. In J. Pelclova & W. L. Lu (Eds.), Persuasion in public discourse: Cognitive and functional perspectives (pp. 259–277). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ozturk, I. (2007). The textual organisation of research article introductions in Applied Linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes, 26(1), 25–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variation across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005). An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 141–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánta, B. (2015). Introducing the literary critic: The cars model in the introductions of academic papers in literary criticism. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 3(2), 84–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shehzad, W. (2008). Move two: Establishing a niche. Ibérica, 15, 25–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sheldon, E. (2011). Rhetorical differences in RA introductions written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(4), 238–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sun, L. (2015). Identity construction by Chinese MA students in their theses. Foreign Language and Their Teaching, 5, 15–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, R., & John, S. (1999). The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes, 18, S23–S39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, G., & Chen, T. G. (1991). Linguistics, cultural and sub-cultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts. Applied Linguistics, 12, 319–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wu, G. (2013). Identify construction in English and Chinese research articles: A contrastive study. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, F. (2011). A corpus-based study of identity chunks in Chinese students’ academic English writing. Foreign Language Research, 3, 57–63.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue