In:Expanding Individual Difference Research in the Interaction Approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors
Edited by Laura Gurzynski-Weiss
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 16] 2017
► pp. 173–199
Chapter 8Vietnamese TESOL teachers’ cognitions and practices
Developing learner-centered learning
Published online: 12 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.16.08chu
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.16.08chu
Abstract
Due to its historical and socio-cultural context, the traditional way of teaching and learning in Vietnam follows Confucian traditions and is characterized by teacher-centeredness and passive student learning. To develop learner autonomy and promote the development of communicative competence, especially in English classrooms, recent policy reforms require a shift from traditional teaching to a learner-centered approach and methods that promote meaningful interaction. This study was undertaken in a tertiary teaching setting in Vietnam where English is taught to speakers of other languages. A total of 36 English language teachers participated with a particular focus, a sub-group of 10. We used open-ended survey questions, classroom observations, and in-depth interviews to explore teacher cognitions and the relationship of these to pedagogical practices. Using thematic analysis, we found that teachers’ cognitions centered on five issues: centrality of student need, the acknowledgement of student characteristics, the cultivation of student autonomy, the development of interpersonal relationships in the classroom, and principled pragmatism. Through classroom observations we found individual variation, but overall a complex, and at times inconsistent, relationship between teacher cognitions and their classroom practices.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Background
- Teacher cognitions
- Teacher cognitions and pedagogical practices
- Present study
- Method
- Research setting
- Participants
- Procedure
- Analysis
- Results and discussion
- The centrality of student need
- The acknowledgement of student characteristics
- The cultivation of student autonomy
- Development of interpersonal relationships in the classroom
- Principled pragmatism
- Teacher characteristics, cognitions, and practices
- Conclusion
Acknowledgements References Appendix
References (74)
Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2004). Teachers’ stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 243–272.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109.
(2009). Language teacher cognition. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 163–171). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Breen, M. P., Hird, B., Milton, M., Oliver, R., & Thwaite, A. (2001). Making sense of language teaching: Teachers’ principles and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 22(4), 470–501.
Brindley, G. (1989). The role of needs analysis in adult ESL program design. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 63–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brooks, L., & Swain, M. (2009). Languaging in collaborative writing: Creation of and response to expertise. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honour of Susan M. Gass (pp. 58–89). New York, NY: Routledge.
Brown, K. L. (2003). From teacher-centered to learner-centered curriculum: Improving learning in diverse classrooms. Education, 124(1), 49–54.
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Crookes, G. (2009). Values, philosophies, and beliefs in TESOL: Making a statement. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Crookes, G., & Arakaki, L. (1999). Teaching idea sources and work conditions in an ESL program. TESOL Journal, 8(1), 15–19.
Cumming, A. (1989). Student teachers’ conceptions of curriculum: Towards an understanding of language teacher development. TESL Canada Journal, 7(1), 33–51.
Ellis, G. (1996). How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach? ELT Journal, 50(3), 213–218.
Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65.
Foss, D. H., & Kleinsasser, R. C. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers’ views of pedagogical and mathematical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 429–442.
Freeman, D., & Richards, J. C. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and the education of second language teachers. TESOL Quarterly, 27(2), 193–216.
Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. (2001). Chiến lược phát triển giáo dục 2001–2010. Ban hành kèm theo Quyết định số 201/2001/QĐ-TTg ngày 28 tháng 12 năm 2001 của Thủ tướng Chính phủ. Hà nội: Việt Nam [Strategies for the Development of Education 2001–2010. Promulgated by Decision No. 201/2001/QĐ-TTg of 28/12/2001 by the Prime Minister]. Hanoi: The Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
. (2012). Chiến lược phát triển giáo dục 2011–2020. Ban hành kèm theo Quyết định số số 711/QĐ-TTg ngày 13 tháng 6 năm 2012 của Thủ tướng Chính phủ. Hà nội: Việt Nam [Strategies for the Development of Education 2011–2020. Promulgated by Decision No. 711/QĐ-TTg of 13/06/2012 by the Prime Minister]. Hanoi: The Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2016). Factors influencing Spanish instructors’ in-class feedback. Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 255–275.
Hall, D. R. (2001). Materials production: Theory and practice. In D. R. Hall & A. Hewings (Eds.), Innovation in English language teaching: A reader (pp. 229–239). London: Routledge.
Hanreddy, J., & Whalley, E. (2007a). Mosaic 1. Listening/ Speaking (Silver ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education.
Hewitt-Taylor, J. (2001). Use of constant comparative analysis in qualitative research. Nursing Standard, 15(42), 39–42.
Hoang, V. V. (2010). The current situation and issues of the teaching of English in Vietnam. Studies in Language and Culture, 22(1), 7–18.
Humphreys, G., & Wyatt, M. (2014). Helping Vietnamese university learners to become more autonomous. ELT Journal, 68(1), 52–63.
Junqueira, L., & Kim, Y. J. (2013). Exploring the relationship between training, beliefs, and teachers’ corrective feedback practices: A case study of a novice and an experienced ESL teacher. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(2), 181–206.
Kamibeppu, T. (2009). Education reform context and process in Vietnam. In Y. Hirosato & Y. Kitamura (Eds.), The political economy of educational reforms and capacity development in Southeast Asia (pp. 169–189). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. American Educational Research Association, 72(2), 177–228.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The postmethod condition: Emerging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 27–48.
Little, D. (2004). Constructing a theory of learner autonomy: Some steps along the way. In K. Makinen, P. Kaikkonen, & V. Kohonen (Eds.), Future perspectives in foreign language education (pp. 15–25). Oulu: Faculty of Education, Oulu University.
Lo Bianco, J. (1993). Issues and aspects of Vietnam’s language policy: Some reflections after a brief visit. Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 6, 24–32.
London, J. D. (2007). Schooling in Vietnam. In G. Postiglione & J. Tan (Eds.), Going to school in East Asia: Global schoolroom (pp. 413–443). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Long, M. H. (2005). Overview: A rationale for needs analysis and needs analysis research. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
MacDonald, M., Badger, R., & White, G. (2001). Changing values: What use are theories of language learning and teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(8), 949–963.
Mahmoud, A. (2013). Learner involvement in language development: From course design to performance assessment. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 679–683.
McCombs, B. L., & Whisler, J. S. (1997). The learner-centered classroom and school strategies for increasing student motivation and achievement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
(2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Miaoa, Y., Badger, R., & Zhen, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179–200.
Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Ngoc, K. M., & Iwashita, N. (2012). A comparison of learners’ and teachers’ attitudes toward communicative language teaching at two universities in Vietnam. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 7, 25–49.
Nguyen, K. D., & McInnis, C. (2002). The possibility of using student evaluations in Vietnamese higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 8(2), 151–158.
Nguyen, T. H. (2002). Vietnam: Cultural background for ESL/EFL teachers. The Review of Vietnamese Studies, 2(1), 1–6.
Nguyen, T. H. A. (2002). Cultural effects in learning and teaching English in Vietnam. The Language Teacher Online, 1, 1–5.
O’Neill, G., & McMahon, T. (2005). Student-centered learning: What does it mean for students and lecturers? In G. O’Neill, S. Moore & B. McMullin (Eds.), Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching (pp. 27–36). Dublin: AISHE.
Oscarson, M. (1989). Self-assessment of language proficiency: rationale and applications. Language Testing, 6(1), 1–13.
Paris, C., & Combs, B. (2006). Lived meanings: What teachers mean when they say they are learner-centered. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(5), 571–592.
Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science, 3, 1633–1636.
Pavlik, C., & Segal, M. K. (2007). Interactions 2. Writing (Silver ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education.
Peacock, M. (1998). Exploring the gap between teachers’ and learners’ beliefs about ‘useful’ activities for EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 233–250.
Pham, L. H., & Fry, G. W. (2004). Education and economic, political, and social change in Vietnam. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 3(3), 199–222.
Phelps, R., Ha, T. T. N., Graham, A., & Geeves, R. (2012). But how do we learn? Talking to Vietnamese children about how they learn in and out of school. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 289–302.
Richards, J. C. (1998). Beyond training: Perspectives on language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sadker, D. M., & Zittleman, K. R. (2007). Teachers, schools, and society. A brief introduction to education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Shehadeh, A. (2012). Introduction: Broadening the perspective of task-based language teaching scholarship: The contribution of research in foreign language contexts. In A. Shehadeh & A. C. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts. Research and implementation (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tudor, I. (1996). Learner-centeredness as language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, J. C., Christensen, A., & Meyer, D. K. (2009). Teachers’ beliefs about student learning and motivation. In L. J. Saha & A. G. Dworkin (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers and teaching (pp. 361–371). New York, NY: Springer.
Ulichny, P. (1996). What’s in a methodology? In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 178–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, C. (2007). Focus on the language learner in an era of globalization: Tensions, positions and practices in technology-mediated language teaching. Language Teaching, 40(4), 321–326.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pairs versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445–466.
