Cover not available

In:Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness
Edited by Marina Terkourafi
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 14] 2015
► pp. 239–266

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Impoliteness electrified

ERPs reveal the real time processing of disrespectful reference in Mandarin utterance comprehension

Published online: 28 May 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.14.12jia
Being polite is an effective way to facilitate interpersonal communication. One of the key issues is how the human cognitive system perceives verbal politeness and deals with the cases in which politeness principles are violated. By using event-related potentials (ERPs), we aim to address the nature of real time processing of disrespectful reference in Mandarin utterance interpretation. The consistency between the social status of the communicating partners and the use of second-person pronoun was manipulated as a testing case. Participants read utterances in which the social status of the communicating partners was either consistent with the pronoun (e.g. respectful) or violated the pronoun (e.g. disrespectful), while undergoing the recording of electrophysiological activity on the scalp. Earlier research has demonstrated that semantic, syntactic and inferential pragmatic processing could be manifested in different ERP effects. Our ERP findings demonstrated that successful handling of disrespectful address may engage semantic-pragmatic mechanisms (as reflected by a N400 and late negativity effect), rather than a mechanism dealing with grammatical error. Moreover, the ERP responses were modulated by individual differences in tolerance to the disrespectful usage, gender, and social interactive ability. These ERP indices of real time processing of disrespectful utterances are consistent with the “conventionalization view” in im/politeness theory (Culpeper 2011; Terkourafi 2002, 2003, 2005).
References (77)
References
Baggio, G., van Lambalgen, M. & Hagoort, P. 2008. Computing and recomputing discourse models: An ERP study. Journal of Memory and Language 59: 36–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonnefon, J., Feeney, A. & Villejoubert, G. 2009. When some is actually all: Scalar inferences in face-threatening contexts. Cognition 112: 249–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonnefon, J., Villejoubert, G. 2006. Tactful or doubtful? Expectations of politeness explain the severity bias in the interpretation of probability phrases. Psychological Science 17: 747–751. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brennan, S.E., Galati, A. & Kuhlen, A. 2010. Two minds, one dialog: Coordinating speaking and understanding. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 53, B. Ross (ed.) New York NY: Academic Press/Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Wsage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cansler, D. & Stiles, W. 1981. Relative status and interpersonal presumptuousness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 17: 459–471. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chao, Y. 1956. Chinese terms of address. Language 32: 217–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, X. 2014. Politeness processing as situated social cognition: A RT-theoretic account. Journal of Pragmatics 71: 117–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chentsova-Dutton, Y., Tsai, J. 2007. Gender differences in emotional response among European Americans and Hmong Americans. Cognition and Emotion 21: 162–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulson, S., King, J.W. & Kutas, M. 1998. Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes 13(1): 21–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulson, S., & Williams, R. 2005. Hemispheric asymmetries and joke comprehension. Neuropsychologia 43: 128–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulson, S. & Wu, Y. 2005. Right hemisphere activation of joke-related information: an event-related brain potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17: 494–506. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coulson, S. & Van Petten, C. 2007. A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension?: ERP evidence from hemifield presentation. Brain Research 1146: 128–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. (Im) politeness: Three issues. Journal of Pragmatics 44(9): 1128–1133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davis, M. 1980. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 10: 85.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Federmeier, W., Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. 2007. Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research 1146: 75–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friederici, A. 2011. The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Review 91: 1357–1392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language 50(3): 259–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friederici, A., Hahne, A. & Mecklinger, A. 1996. Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 22: 1219–1248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantic, 3: Speech Acts, P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagoort, P. 2005. On broca, brain, and binding: a new framework, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 416–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M. & Peterson, K. 2004. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 5669: 438–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hald, L., Steenbeek-Planting, E. & Hagoort, P. 2007. The interaction of discourse context and world knowledge in online sentence comprehension: Evidence from the N400. Brain Research 1146: 210–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holtgraves, T. 1986. Language structure in social interaction: Perceptions of direct and indirect speech acts and interactants who use them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 305–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Interpreting questions and replies: Effects of face-threat, question form, and gender. Social Psychology Quarterly 54: 15–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Social psychology, cognitive psychology, and linguistic politeness. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture 1: 73–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holtgraves, T. & Kashima, Y. 2008. Language, meaning, and social cognition. Personality and Social Psychology Review 12: 73–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holtgraves, T. & Yang, J. 1992. Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: General principles and differences due to culture and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62: 246–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hong, B. 1985. Politeness in Chinese: Impersonal pronouns and personal greetings. Anthropological Linguistics 27: 204–213.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inui, K. & Osterhout, L. 2005. An ERP study of Japanese honorification: Are honorific features grammaticalized? Poster in the 18th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
Jang, S. 2007. Gender differences in strain, negative emotions, and coping behaviors: A general strain theory approach. Justice Quarterly 24: 523–553. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, X., Li, Y. & Zhou, X. 2013a. Is it over-respectful or disrespectful? Differential brain activities in perceiving pragmatic violation of social status information during utterance comprehension. Neuropsychologia 51: 2210–2223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. Even a rich man can afford that expensive house: ERP responses to construction-based pragmatic constraints during sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia 51: 1857–1866. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, X., Tan, Y. & Zhou, X. 2009. Processing the universal quantifier during sentence comprehension: ERP evidence. Neuropsychologia 47: 1799–1815. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jiang, X. & Zhou, X. 2009. Processing different levels of syntactic hierarchy: An ERP study on Chinese. Neuropsychologia 47: 1282–1293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Multiple semantic processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy: Does higher-level semantic process proceed in the face of local semantic failure? Neuropsychologia 50: 1918–1928. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolk, H. & Chwilla, D. 2007. Late positivities in unusual situations. Brain and Language 100: 257–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotz, S. & Paulmann, S. 2007. When emotional prosody and semantics dance cheek to cheek: ERP evidence. Brain Research 1151: 107–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuperberg, G. 2007. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax. Brain Research 1146: 23–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kutas, M. & Federmeier, K. 2011. Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology 62: 621–647. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuo, S. 2002. From solidarity to antagonism: The uses of the second-person singular pronoun in Chinese political discourse. Text 22: 29–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee-Wong, S.M. 2000. Politeness and face in Chinese culture. In Cross Cultural Communication, E. Hess-Lüttich & R. Watts (eds), 41–58. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leuthold, H., Filik, R., Murphy, K. & Mackenzie, G. In press. The online processing of socio-emotional information in prototypical scenarios: Inferences from brain potentials. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.
Li, S., Jiang, X., Yu, H. & Zhou, X. In press. Cognitive empathy modulates the processing of pragmatic constraints during sentence comprehension. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.
Macaulay, M. 2001. Tough talk: Indirectness and gender in requests for information. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 293–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mao, Y. 2003. Yingxiang Hanyu Di’er Rencheng Shiyong de Shehui Wenhua Yinsu (Social and cultural factors in the use of second-person pronoun in Mandarin Chinese). MA dissertation, Beijing Language and Culture University.
McRae, K., Ochsner, K., Mauss, I., Gabrieli, J. & Gross, J. 2008. Gender Differences in Emotion Regulation: An fMRI Study of Cognitive Reappraisal. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 11: 143–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Momo, K., Sakai, H. & Sakai, K. 2008. Syntax in a native language still continues to develop in adults: Honorification judgment in Japanese. Brain and Language 107: 81–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nieuwland, M., Ditman, T. & Kuperberg, G. 2010. On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. Journal of Memory and Language 63: 324–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P.J. 1992. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language 31(6): 785–806. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pell, M., Paulmann, S., Dara, C., Alasseri, A., & Kotz, S. 2009. Factors in the recognition of vocally expressed emotions: A comparison of four languages. Journal of Phonetics 37: 417–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Politzer-Ahles, S., Fiorentino. R., Jiang, X., & Zhou, X. 2013. Event-related potential investigation of scalar implicature processing in Chinese using picture-sentence verification. Brain Research 1490: 134–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Regal, S., Coulson, S., & Gunter, T. 2010. The communicative style of a addresser can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony. Brain Research 1311: 121–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sakai, K. 2005. Language acquisition and brain development. Science 310: 815–819. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saito, M., Kondo, N., Kondo, K., Ojima, T, & Hirai, H. 2012. Gender differences on the impacts of social exclusion on mortality among older Japanese: AGES cohort study. Social Science & Medicine 75: 940–945. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steinhauer, K. 2014. Event-related potentials (ERPs) in second language research: A brief introduction to the technique, a selected review, and an invitation to reconsider critical periods in L2. Applied Linguistics 35: 393–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Generalized and particularized implicatures of politeness. In Perspectives on Dialogue in the New Millennium [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 114], P. Kuehnlein, H. Rieser & H. Zeevat (eds), 149–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Pragmatic correlateds of frequency of use: the case for a notion of ‘minimal context.’ In Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the 21st Century, S. Marmaridou, K. Nikiforidou & E. Antonopoulou (eds), 209–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tesink, C., Petersson, K., Van Berkum, J., Van den Brink, D., Buitelaar, J. & Hagoort, P. 2009. Unification of speaker and meaning in language comprehension: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21: 2085–2099. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Berkum. J. 2009. The neuropragmatics of ‘simple’ utterance comprehension: An ERP review. In Semantics and Pragmatics: From Experiment to Theory, U. Sauerland & K. Yatsushiro (eds). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Berkum, J., Holleman, B., Nieuwland, M., Otten, M., & Murre, J. 2009. Right or wrong? The brain’s fast response to morally objectionable statements. Psychological Science 20: 1092–1099. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Berkum, J., Van den Brink, D., Tesink, C., Kos, M. & Hagoort, P. 2008. The neural integration of addresser and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20: 580–591. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van den Brink, D., Van Berkum, J., Bastiaansen, M., Tesink, C., Kos, M., Buitelaar, J. & Hagoort, P. 2012. Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 7: 173–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, L., Ma, Q., Song, Z., Shi, Y., Wang, Y. & Pfotenhauer, L. 2011. N400 and the activation of prejudice against rural migrant workers in China. Brain Research 1375: 103–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, K., Crites, S., Jr., Taylor, J. & Corral, G. 2009. Wait, what? Assessing stereotype incongruities using the N400 ERP component. Social, Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 4: 191–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yao, B, Belin, P., Scheepers, C. 2011. Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 3146–3152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ye, Z., Luo, Y., Friederici, A., Zhou, X. 2006. Semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research 1071 186–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ye, Z., & Zhou, X. 2008. Involvement of cognitive control in sentence comprehension: Evidence from ERPs. Brain Research 1203: 103–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Executive control in language processing. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 33: 1168–1177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, A., Vance, C. & Ensher, E. 2003. Individual differences in sensitivity to disempowering acts: A comparison of gender and identity-based explanations for perceived offensiveness. Sex Roles 49: 163–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhou, X. 2008. Xiandai Hanyu Limao Yuyan Yanjiu (A study of politeness language in modern Chinese). Beijing: China Social Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Jiang, X., Ye, Z., Zhang, Y., Lou, K. & Zhan, W. 2010. Semantic integration processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia 48: 1551–1562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, M., Jiang, X. & Zhou, X. In preparation. When empathy intervenes: Processing linguistic and extra-linguistic agreement during utterance comprehension.
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Jeong, Hyeyun, Sungeun Lee, Jieun Kiaer, Haayan Jang, Lucien Brown & Jiyeong Kim
2025. An ERP study on the pragmatic processing of Korean honorifics and politeness. Korean Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Olmen, Daniel Van, Jonathan Culpeper, Riccardo Giomi & Marta Andersson
2025. 31 The grammar of impoliteness. In The Grammar of Impoliteness, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ferguson, Heather J.
2024. Commentary on the special issue: new approaches to figurative language research. Discourse Processes 61:1-2 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Li, Yi & Xiaoming Jiang
2024. Sound symbolic associations: evidence from visual, tactile, and interpersonal iconic perception of Mandarin rimes. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo
Cao, Ningning, Ling Zhou & Shaojie Zhang
2023. The Effects of Social Status and Imposition on the Comprehension of Refusals in Chinese: An ERP Study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52:6 ► pp. 1989 ff. DOI logo
Vergis, Nikos, Xiaoming Jiang & Marc D. Pell
2020. Neural responses to interpersonal requests: Effects of imposition and vocally-expressed stance. Brain Research 1740 ► pp. 146855 ff. DOI logo
Holtgraves, Thomas & Jean-François Bonnefon
2017. Experimental Approaches to Linguistic (Im)politeness. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 381 ff. DOI logo
Jiang, Xiaoming
2017. Experimental Approaches to Socio‐Linguistics: Usage and Interpretation of Non‐Verbal and Verbal Expressions in Cross‐ Cultural Communication. In Sociolinguistics - Interdisciplinary Perspectives, DOI logo
Jiang, Xiaoming & Xiaolin Zhou
2015. Who is respectful? Effects of social context and individual empathic ability on ambiguity resolution during utterance comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 6 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue