Cover not available

In:Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness
Edited by Marina Terkourafi
[AILA Applied Linguistics Series 14] 2015
► pp. 149–180

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Shaming, group face, and identity construction in a Russian virtual community for women

Published online: 28 May 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.14.08per
Impoliteness, often described as non-cooperative and norm-disrupting verbal behavior (Keinpointner 2008; Culpeper et al. 2003; Beebe 1995), can also serve important sociability functions. When tension is present between individual and group face wants, impoliteness can be used to establish, reinforce, or (re)negotiate values salient to the group (Culpeper 2011; Lea at al. 1992; Graham 2007). The intersection of impoliteness with group face concerns is especially important in polylogous online contexts (Blitvich 2010; Lorenzo-Dus at al. 2011; Perelmutter 2013). This study examines the intersection between individual and group face concerns by examining impoliteness in an online Russian-language forum dedicated to discussions of marital infidelity. This forum is frequented by both mistresses and cheated-upon wives. Mistresses post confessions, expecting and sometimes even soliciting shaming responses from other forum members; wives engage in troubles-telling and are mocked by mistresses; mistresses and wives insult and shame each other. Since the overarching societal norms and expectations of family mores and gendered behavior in the post-Soviet society are often unclear, these shaming practices help Russian-speaking women construct and negotiate their identities within a group of peers. These negotiations integrate individual, group, and societal face concerns.
References (62)
References
Alekseeva, L.I. 1990. Rechevoi akt soveta v sovremennom russkom iazyke. Potsdamer Forschungen 106: 43–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ashwin, S. (ed). 2000. Gender, State, and Society in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia. New York NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barker, C. & Galasinski, D. 2001. Cultural Studies and Discourse Analysis. A Dialogue on Language and Identity. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beebe, L. 1995. Polite fictions: Instrumental rudeness as pragmatic competence. In Georgetown University Round Table on Language Teachers: Ethnolinguistic, Psycholinguistic, and Sociolinguistic Aspects, J. Alatis, C. Straehle, B. Gallenberger & M. Ronkin (eds), 154–168. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belyaeva, Y. 1996. Advice and soviet: A cross-cultural perspective on speech acts. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, J.M. Johnson, M.L. Juge & J.L. Moxley (eds), 13–24. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, H.J. & Spindler, J.W. 1963. Soviet comrades’ courts. Washington Law Review 38: 854–855.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bilaniuk, L. 2003. Gender, language attitudes, and language status in Ukraine. Language in Society 32: 47–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 167]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bousfield, D. & Locher, M.A. 2008. Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruxelles, S. & Kerbrat Orecchioni, C. 2004. Coalitions in polylogues. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 75–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buckley, M. 2009. Public opinion in Russia on the politics of human trafficking. Europe-Asia Studies 61(2): 213–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burke, P.J. & Stets, J.E. 2009. Identity Theory. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohn, E.D. 2009. Sex and the married communist: Family troubles, marital infidelity, and party discipline in the postwar USSR, 1945–64. The Russian Review 68: 429–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 349–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Reflections on impoliteness, relational work and power. In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, D. Bousfield & M.A. Locher (eds), 17–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D. & Wichmann, A. 2003. Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1545–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckert, P. & McConnell-Ginet, S. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filippov, E.I. 1979. Obščestvenno-tovariščeskoe sudoproizvodstvo v SSSR [Communal comrade courts in the USSR]. Rostov: Izdatel’stvo Rostovskogo universiteta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gal, S. & Kligman, G. 2000. The Politics of Gender after Socialism: A Comparative-Historical Essay. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. 2010. A genre approach to the study of (im)politeness. International Review of Pragmatics 2: 46–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Introduction: Face, identity and im/politeness. Looking backward, moving forward: From Goffman to practice theory. Journal of Politeness Research 9: 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1967[1955]. Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, S.L. 2007. Disagreeing to agree: Conflict, (im)politeness and identity in a computer-mediated community. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 742–759. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, M. 2007. The discursive challenge to politeness research: an interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research 3: 95–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayne, S.C. & Rice, R.E. 1997. Attribution accuracy when using anonymity in group support systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 47: 429–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, J. & Meyerhoff, M. 1999. The community of practice: theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society 28: 173–183. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Issoupova, O. 2000. From duty to pleasure? Motherhood in Soviet and post-Soviet Russia. In Gender, State, and Society in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia, S. Ashwin (ed.), 30–54. New York NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kharkhordin, O. 1999. The Collective and the Individual in Russia. A Study of Practices. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kienpointner, M. 2008. Impoliteness and emotional arguments. Journal of Politeness Research 4: 243–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LaFont, S. 2001. One step forward, two steps back: Women in the post-Communist states. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 34: 203–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavé, J. & Wenger, E. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lea, M., O’Shea, T., Fung, P., & Spears, R. 1992. ‘Flaming’ in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. In Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication, M. Lea (ed.), 89–112. New York NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, E. 1989. Sex and Society in the World of the Orthodox Slavs, 900–1700. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liberman, M. 2000. Legal, ethical and policy issues concerning the recording and publication of primary language materials. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Web-based Documentation and Description, S. Bird & G. Simons (eds).
Locher, M.A. & Limberg, H. 2012. Introduction to advice in discourse. In Advice in Discourse, H. Limberg & M.A. Locher (eds), 1–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, M.A. 2006. Advice Online: Advice-giving in an American Internet Health Column [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 149]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Relational work, politeness, and identity construction. In APA Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, D. Matsumoto (ed.), 112–138. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Situated impoliteness: The interface between relational work and identity construction. In Situated Politeness, B.L. Davies, M. Haugh & A.J. Merrison (eds.), 187–208. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locher, M.A. & Watts, R.J. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 9–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lottes, I.L. & Alkula, T. 2011. An investigation of sexuality-related attitudinal patterns and characteristics related to those patterns for 32 European countries. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 8: 77–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, N. & Garces-Conejos Blitvich, P. 2011. On-line polylogues and impoliteness: The case of postings sent in response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube video. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2578–2593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcoccia, M. 2004. Online polylogues: Conversation structure and participation framework in internet newsgroups. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 115–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, S. 2009. Impoliteness in a cultural context. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1047–1060. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Communities of practice and politeness. In Situated Politeness, B. Davies, M. Haugh & A. Merrison (eds), 73–87. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morrow, P.R. 2012. Online advice in Japanese: Giving advice in an Internet discussion forum. In Advice in Discourse, H. Limberg, Holger & M.A. Locher (eds), 255–280. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelmutter, R. 2010. Impoliteness recycled: Subject ellipsis in Modern Russian complaint discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3214–3231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Klassika zhanra: The flamewar as a genre in the Russian blogosphere. Journal of Pragmatics 45: 74–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. In progress. (Im)politeness and Identity Construction: Russian Women’s Discourse Online.
Ramundo, B.A. 1964. The Comrades’ Court: Molder and keeper of Socialist morality. George Washington Law Review 33: 692–727.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ries, N. 1997. Russian Talk: Culture and Conversation During Perestroika. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shvedova, N. 2009. Gender politics in Russia. In Gender Politics in Post-communist Eurasia, L. Racioppi & K. O’Sullivan See (eds.), 157–161. East Lansing MI: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tartakovskaya, I. 2000. The changing representation of gender roles in the Soviet and post-Soviet press. In Gender, State, and Society in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia, S. Ashwin (ed.), 118–135. New York NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. 2008. Toward a unified theory of politeness, impoliteness, and rudeness. In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, D. Bousfield & M.A. Locher (eds), 45–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Upadhyay, S.R. 2010. Identity and impoliteness in computer mediated reader responses. Journal of Politeness Research 6: 105–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wanner, C. 1998. Burden of Dreams: History and Identity in Post-Soviet Ukraine. University Park PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widmer, E.D., Treas, J. & Newcomb, R. 1998. Attitudes toward nomarital sex in 24 countries. Journal of Sex Research 35: 349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Worobec, C.D. 1987. Horse thieves and peasant justice in post-emancipation imperial Russia. Journal of Social History 21: 281–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Kádár, Dániel Z. & Puyu Ning
2019. Ritual public humiliation. Acta Linguistica Academica 66:2 ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Zanotti, Serenella
2019. Investigating the genesis of translated films: a view from the Stanley Kubrick Archive. Perspectives 27:2 ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Xiangdong
2017. Impoliteness in Reader Comments on Japanese Online News Sites. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Márquez Reiter, Rosina, Kristina Ganchenko & Anna Charalambidou
2016. Requests and counters in Russian traffic police officer-citizen encounters. Pragmatics and Society 7:4 ► pp. 512 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue