“Are you saying …?”: Metapragmatic comments in Nigerian quasi-judicial public hearings

This study explores metapragmatic comments in Nigerian quasi-judicial public hearings, involving interactions between complainants, defendants and a hearing panel, with a view to investigating their forms, features, distribution and functions. The data are analysed quantitatively and qualitatively from a discourse-pragmatic framework that incorporates Verschueren’s theory of metapragmatics, Mey’s pragmatic act theory, Grice’s Cooperative Principle and conversation analysis. Four types of metapragmatic comments are used: speech act descriptions, talk regulation comments, maxim adherence/violation related comments and metalinguistic comments. Their distribution and functioning are shown to be partly predictable from properties of the speech event, while they also co-determine the nature and development of the analysed hearings.

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Aijmer, Karin
1996Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berlin, N. Lawrence
2007“Cooperative Conflict and Evasive Language: The Case of the 9–11 Commission Hearings.” In Context and appropriateness, ed. by A. Fetzer, 167–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., and H. Sheffer
1993“The Metapragmatic Discourse of American-Israeli Families at Dinner.” In Interlanguage Pragmatics, ed. by G. Kasper, and S. Blum-Kulka, 196–223. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, Zanni
2007A Discourse Analysis of Selected Truth and Reconciliation Commission Testimonies: Appraisal and Genre. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of the Western Cape.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008“‘Language has a Heart’: Linguistic Markers of Evaluation in Selected TRC Testimonies.” Language of Multicultural Discourses 3 (3): 189–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011“Code-switching: An Appraisal Resource in TRC Testimonies.” Functions of Language 18 (2): 183–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, Z., N. Mazwi, S. Metula, and N. Mpolweni-Zantsi
2006“An Analysis of what has been ‘Lost’ in the Interpretation and Transcription Process of Selected TRC Testimonies.” Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS 33: 1–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, J. Laurel
2008Comment Clauses in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
1998Metapragmatics. In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. by J.L. Mey, 581–585. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carranza, E. Isolda
2008“Metapragmatics in a Courtroom Genre.” Pragmatics 18 (2): 169–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ciliberti, A. , and L. Anderson
2007“Metapragmatic Comments in Institutional Talk. A Comparative Analysis across Settings.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 143–166. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Geer, Boel
2004“‘Don’t say it’s disgusting!’ Comments on Socio-Moral Behavior in Swedish Families.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1705–1725. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by P. Cole and J. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grundy, Peter
2008Doing Pragmatics. (3rd edn). London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haberland, Hartmut
2007“Language Shift in Conversation as a Metapragmatic Comment.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 129–142. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hongladoram, Krisadawan
2007“’Don’t blame me for criticising you…’: A Study of Metapragmatic Comments in Thai.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 29–48. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hübler, Abel
2007“On the Metapragmatics of Gestures.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 107–128. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hübler, A., and W. Bublitz
2007“Introducing Metapragmatics in Use.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 1–28. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacquemet, Marco
1992“’If he speaks Italian it’s better’: Metapragmatics in Court.” Pragmatics 2 (2): 111 – 126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janney, W. Richard
2007“‘So your story now is that…’: Metapragmatic Framing Strategies in Courtroom Interrogation.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 223–234. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meinig, Bob
1998 “Public Hearings: When and How to Hold Them.” MRSC Publications. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from http://​www​.mrsc​.org​/focuspub​/hearings​.aspx
Mey, L. Jacob
2001Pragmatics: An Introduction. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter
2007“A Metapragmatic Examination of Therapist Reformulations.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 235–262. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penz, Hermine
2007“Building Common Ground through Metapragmatic Comments in International Project Work.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 263–292. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pizziconi, Barbara
2007“Facework and Multiple Selves in Apologetic Metapragmatic Comments in Japanese.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 49–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson
1974“A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696 – 735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, S.W., and X. Liang
2007“Metapragmatic Expressions in Physics Lectures: Integrating Representations, Guiding Processing, and Assigning Participant Roles.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 167–199. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2008“Face (Im)politeness and Rapport.” In Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, ed. by H. Spencer-Oatey, 11–47. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stude, Juliane
2007“The Acquisition of Metapragmatic Abilities in Preschool Children.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 199–22. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanskanen, Sanna-Kaisa
2007“Metapragmatic Utterances in Computer-mediated Interaction.”. In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by W. Bublitz, and A. Hübler, 87–106. ed. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unuabonah, O. Foluke
2012“The Generic Structure of Presentations in Quasi-Judicial Public Hearings on the FCT Administration in Nigeria in 2008.” California Linguistic Notes 37 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016“Contextual Beliefs in a Nigerian Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing.” Journal of Asian and African Studies, 51(5): 619–633. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verdoolaege, Annelies
2009a“The Audience as Actor: The Participation Status of the Audience at the Victim Hearings of the South African TRC.” Discourse Studies 11 (4): 441–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009b“Dealing with a Traumatic Past: The Victim Hearings of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission and their Reconciliation Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies 6 (4): 297–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000“Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use.” Pragmatics 10 (4): 439–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue