Doing pragmatics with style: A corpus-pragmatic study of NOT-negation in the writings of Ta-Nehisi Coates
Linguistic expressions of negation have been investigated from various perspectives: sociolinguistic variation, syntax, semantics and pragmatics. However, this linguistic phenomenon has received little attention in discourse studies. This corpus-pragmatic case study presents a systematic analysis of the use and functions of NOT-negation in oppositional discourse, specifically in the writings of Ta-Nehisi Coates. Methodologically, it combines a variationist approach and corpus-based discourse analysis. The findings, analyzed through the lens of audience design, reveal that Coates’s use of NOT-negation contributes to a conversational style of writing which can be interpreted as a strategy to maintain a dialogical flow of discourse.
Publication history
This paper examines the use of syntactic negation in an oppositional type of discourse, namely discourse on race in the USA. Such a discourse typically presupposes the articulation of alternative lived experience(s) in contrast with the mainstream narrative. The paper presents a systematic analysis of two types of prototypical syntactic negators — not and the contracted enclitic form n’t — and their functions in the writings of a contemporary African American writer, Ta-Nehisi Coates (1975–). Coates has been recognized as “the most important essayist in a generation […] who changed the national political conversation about race” (Fear 2019).