Deictic categories as mitigating devices

Henk Haverkate
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Auwera, J. van der
(1983) “Conditionals and antecedent possibilities”. Journal of Pragmatics 7: 297-309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazzanella, C
(1990) “ ‘Modal’ uses of the Italian indicativo imperfetto in a pragmatic perspective”. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 439-459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boer, M. de
(1987) “The Italian conditional”. Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp.
Brown, P. and S.C. Levinson
(1987) Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, S.C
(1986) “Linguistically motivated knowledge representation”. Working Papers in Functional Grammar 9. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Ch.J
(1971) “Types of lexical information”. In D.D. Steinberg & L.A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics. An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 370-392.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1975) Santa Cruz lectures on deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, B
(1975) “Hedged performatives”. In P. Cole & J.M. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 187-211.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980) “Conversational mitigation”. Journal of Pragmatics 4: 341-350.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H.P
(1975) “Logic and conversation”. In P. Cole & J.M. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 41-59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
. & R. Hasan (1990) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haverkate, H
(1979) Impositive sentences in Spanish. Theory and description in linguistic pragmatics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1984) Speech acts, speakers and hearers, reference and referential strategies in Spanish. Amsterdam: Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hooper, J.B
(1975) “On assertive predicates”. In J. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics 4. New York: Academic Press, 91-124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, O
(1955) The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen-Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koike, D.A
(1989) “Requests and the role of deixis”. Journal of Pragmatics 13: 187-202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G
(1972) “Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts”. In P.M. Peranteau et al. (eds.), Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 183-228.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rauh, G
(1983) “Aspects of deixis”. In G. Rauh (ed.), Essays on deixis. Tübingen: Narr, 9-60.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J.R
(1969) Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1976) “A classification of illocutionary acts”. Language in Society 5: 1-23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spitzer, L
(1918) Aufsätze zur romanischen Syntax und Stilistik. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urmson, J.O
(1952) “Parenthetical verbs”. Mind 61: 480-496.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue