Spontaneous and non-spontaneous turn-taking

Maite Taboada

Turn-taking is usually considered to follow a simple set of rules, enacted through a perhaps more complicated system of signals. The most significant aspect of the turn-taking process is that, in most cases, it proceeds in a very smooth fashion. Speakers signal to each other that they wish to either yield or take the turn through syntactic, pragmatic, and prosodic means. In this paper, I explore how the turn-taking process develops in two different sets of Spanish conversations. In the first group of conversations, speakers take turns spontaneously, presumably as they would do in everyday situations. In the second group, turns were mechanically controlled, and communication was one-way. A comparison of the two types of conversation provides insights into the signals used in spontaneous turn-taking.

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Auer, Peter
(1996) On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bangerter, Adrian, Herbert H. Clark, and Anna R. Katz
(2004) Navigating joint projects in telephone conversations. Discourse Processes 37.1: 1-23.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey
(1977) The dynamics of interruption and the filled pause. The British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 16.3: 283-284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1979) Planning units in spontaneous speech: Some evidence from hesitation in speech and speaker gaze direction in conversation. Linguistics 17: 61-78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1981) The regulation of speaker turns in face-to-face conversation: Some implications for conversation in sound-only communication channels. Semiotica 34.1-2: 55-70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beattie, Geoffrey, Anne Cutler, and Mark Pearson
(1982) Why is Mrs. Thatcher interrupted so often? Nature 300.23: 744-747. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickmore, Timothy W., and Justine Cassell
(2005) Social dialogue with embodied conversational agents. In J. van Kuppevelt, L. Dybkjaer and N. Bernsen (eds.), Advances in Natural Multimodal Dialogue Systems. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio
(1993) Los conectores pragmáticos en español coloquial (I): Su papel argumentativo. Contextos 11.21-22: 145-188.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
(1978) Universals in language use: Politeness phenomena. In E. N. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 56-289.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byron, Donna K., and Peter A. Heeman
(1998) Identifying discourse markers in spoken dialog, AAAI Spring Symposium on Applying Machine Learning and Discourse Processing. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
(1994) Discourse, Consciousness and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Condon, Sherri L
(1986) The discourse functions of OK. Semiotica 60: 73-101.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001) Discourse ok revisited: Default organization in verbal interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 491-513.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cortés Rodríguez, Luis
(1998) Marcadores del discurso y análisis cuantitativo. In M.A. Martín Zorraquino and E. Montolío Durán (eds.), Los marcadores del discurso: Teoría y análisis. Madrid: Arco, pp. 143-160.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne, and Mark Pearson
(1986) On the analysis of prosodic turn-taking cues. In C. Johns-Lewis (ed.), Intonation in Discourse. San Diego, CA: College Hill, pp. 139-156.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duncan, Starkey
(1972) Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23: 283-292.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1973) Toward a grammar for dyadic conversation. Semiotica 9.1: 29-46.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duncan, Starkey, and Donald W. Fiske
(1977) Face-to-Face Interaction: Research, Methods, and Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985) Interaction Structure and Strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Edelsky, Carole
(1981) Who's got the floor? Language in Society 10: 383-421.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen
(1997) Form and function of the discourse marker 'anyway': Implications for discourse analysis. Linguistics 35: 343-378.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson
(1996) Practices in the construction of turns: The 'TCU' revisited. Pragmatics 6.3: 427-454.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, and Sandra A. Thompson
(1996) Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 134-184.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox Tree, Jean E., and Josef C. Schrock
(1999) Discourse markers in spontaneous speech: Oh what a difference an oh makes. Journal of Memory and Language 40: 280-295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002) Basic meanings of you know and I mean . Journal of Pragmatics 34: 727-747. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
(1999) What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931-952.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Furo, Hiroko
(2001) Turn-Taking in English and Japanese: Projectability in Grammar, Intonation, and Semantics. New York: Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1981) Forms of Talk. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
(1981) Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosz, Barbara J., and Candace L. Sidner
(1986) Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12.3: 175-204.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayashi, R
(1991) Floor structure of English and Japanese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 1-30.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John
(1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299-345.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hidalgo, Antonio
(1998) Alternancia de turnos y conversación. Sobre el papel regulador de los suprasegmentos en el habla simultánea. Lingüística Española Actual 20.2: 217-238.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Robert
(1992) Telephone Conversation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houtkoop, Hanneke, and Harrie Mazeland
(1985) Turns and discourse units in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 595-619.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaffe, Joseph, and Stanley Feldstein
(1970) Rhythms of Dialogue. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
(1983) On a failed hypothesis: 'Conjunctionals' as overlap-vulnerable. Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 28: 29-33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1984) Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgment tokens "yeah" and "mm hm". Papers in Linguistics 17: 197-216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Rod, and Joanna Thornborrow
(2004) Floors, talk and the organization of classroom activities. Language in Society 33: 399-423.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam
(1994) Do gestures communicate?: A review. Research on Language and Social Interaction 27.3: 175-200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995) Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 23.3: 247-279.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002) Some uses of the head shake. Gesture 2.2: 147-182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knott, Alistair, and Ted Sanders
(1998) The classification of coherence relations and their linguistic markers: An exploration of two languages. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 135-175.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H
(2003) Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society 32.2: 177-201.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Local, John
(1996) Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipts in everyday talk. In E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (eds.), Prosody in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177-230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Local, John, and John Kelly
(1986) Projection and "silences": Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies 9: 185-204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maclay, Howard, and Charles E. Oswood
(1959) Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word 15: 19-44.  BoP Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R
(1984) Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (ed.), Children Writing: Reader. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press, pp. 21-30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet
(1980) The Phonology and Phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
Placencia, María Elena
(1997) Opening up closings-the Ecuadorian way. Text 17.1: 53-81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Interaction: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57-101.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey
(2004) Prompting action: The stand-alone "so" in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37.2: 185-218.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Redeker, Gisela
(1990) Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 367-381.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991) Review article: Linguistic markers of linguistic structure. Linguistics 29.6: 1139-1172.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1992) Lectures on Conversation (Gail Jefferson ed. Vol. II). London: Sage.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emmanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 696-735.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel
(1968) Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70: 10751095. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of uh huh and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk. Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 71-93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988) Discourse as an interactional achievement II: An exercise in Conversation Analysis. In D. Tannen (ed.), Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observations and Understanding. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 135-158.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel, and Harvey Sacks
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 8: 289-327.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
(1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret
(1998) TCUs and TRPs: The construction of units in conversational talk. InLiSt Interaction and Linguistic Structures4: http://​inlist​.uni​-konstanz​.de​/issues​/4​/index​.htmGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000) The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society 29: 477-517.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serrano, María José
(1995) El uso de la verdad y pues como marcadores discursivos de respuesta. Español Actual 64: 5-16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stephens, Jane, and Geoffrey Beattie
(1986) On judging the ends of speaker turns in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 5.2: 119-134.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite
(2003) Modeling task-oriented dialogue. Computers and the Humanities 37.4: 431-454. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2004) Building Coherence and Cohesion: Task-Oriented Dialogue in English and Spanish. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taboada
in press) Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations. Journal of Pragmatics.
Tanaka, Hiroko
(2001) Adverbials for turn projection in Japanese: Toward a demystification of the "telepathic" mode of communication. Language in Society 30.4: 559-587.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wennerstrom, Ann, and Andrew F. Siegel
(2003) Keeping the floor in multiparty conversations: Intonation, syntax, and pause. Discourse Processes 36.2: 77-107.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yngve, Victor H
(1970) On getting a word in edgewise. In Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago: University of Chicago, pp. 567-577.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue