Speech act theory

Table of contents

Many problems that we now consider as proper to speech act theory have already been formulated or at least hinted at on other occasions during the history of Western philosophy and linguistics. Philosophers have been concerned with the relation between the meaning of words, the expression of a proposition, and the act of assertion. Aristotle distinguished between the meaning of words and the assertiveness of declarative sentences (Peri Hermēneias [On interpretation]16b: 26–30). Philosophers of language, rhetoricians, and linguists have been aware of the variety of uses or discourse which roughly corresponded to kinds of speech acts; the theory of language of the Stoics, which was to become very influential for the development of grammatical studies, distinguished judgements, which alone are true or false, from wh questions, polar questions, imperatives, and expressions of wish, correlating their function with their grammatical form.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Alston, William P.
2000Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Apel, Karl-Otto
1991 “Is intentionality more basic than linguistic meaning?” In John Searle and His Critics, ed. by Ernest Lepore and Robert Van Gulick, 31–55. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas M., and Alex Lascarides
2001 “Indirect speech acts.” Synthese 128: 183–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1946 “Other Minds.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Suppl. vol. 20. [Reprinted in Austin (1979), 76–116.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, J. L.
1975How to Do Things with Words. 2nd revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [1st edition 1962.] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1979Philosophical Papers. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [1st edition 1961.] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish
1979Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ballmer, Thomas T., and Waltraud Brennenstuhl
1981Speech Act Classification: A Study in the Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity Verbs. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla, Claudia Caffi, and Marina Sbisà
1991 “Scalar dimensions of illocutionary force.” In Speech Acts: Fiction or Reality?, ed. by Igor Ž. Žagar, 63–76. Ljubljana: IPrA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile
1966Problèmes de linguistique générale [Problems of general linguistics]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House, and Gabriele Kasper
1989 “Investigating cross-cultural pragmatics.” In Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, 1–34. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper
(eds.) 1989Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1978 “Universals in language usage.” In Questions and Politeness, ed. by Esther N. Goody, 56–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1934Sprachtheorie [Theory of language]. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
1999 “On mitigation.” Journal of Pragmatics 31: 881–909. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caponetto, Laura
2021 “A comprehensive definition of illocutionary silencing.” Topoi 40: 191–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caponetto, Laura, and Paolo Labinaz
(eds) 2023Sbisà on Speech as Action. Cham: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cappelen, Herman, and Ernest Lepore
2005Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2002Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, Philip R., Jerry L. Morgan and Martha E. Pollack
(eds) 1990Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William
1994 “Speech act classification, language typology and cognition.” In Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by Savas L. Tsohatzidis, 460–477. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1979 “Moods and performances.” In Meaning and Use, ed. by Avishai Margalit, 9–20. Dordrecht: Reidel. [Reprinted in Donald Davidson, Truth and Interpretation, 109–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
1988 “Intention, language and social action in a Samoan context.” Journal of Pragmatics 12: 13–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
2004A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob
1879Begriffsschrift [Concept writing]. Halle: Nebert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1918 “Der Gedanke: Eine logische Untersuchung” [Thought: A logical inquiry]. Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1: 58–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald
1979Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1981 “Speech act assignment.” In Elements of Discourse Understanding, ed. by Aravind K. Joshi, Bonne L. Webber and Ivan A. Sag, 64–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geis, Michael L.
1995Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, Mitchell S.
2000 “Illocutionary force and semantic content.” Linguistics & Philosophy 23: 435–473. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007Self-Expression. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2023 “On the genealogy and potential abuse of assertoric norms.” Topoi 42: 357–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1957 “Meaning.” The Philosophical Review 66: 377–388. [Reprinted in H. Paul Grice, Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1989.] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1975 “Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. [Reprinted in H. Paul Grice, Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1989.] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
1981Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns [Theory of communicative action]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1984 “Modifying illocutionary force.” Journal of Pragmatics 8: 345–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer, and Rae Langton
1998 “Free speech and illocution.” Legal Theory 4: 21–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katriel, Tamar, and Marcelo Dascal
1989 “Speaker’s commitment and involvement in discourse.” In From Sign to Text, ed. by Yishai Tobin, 275–295. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kibble, Rodger
2013 “Speech act theory and intelligent software agents.” In Pragmatics of Speech Actions, ed. by Marina Sbisà and Ken Turner, 313–338. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail
2013From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kukla, Rebecca
2014 “Performative force, convention, and discursive injustice.” Hypatia 29: 440–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langton, Rae
1993 “Speech acts and unspeakable acts.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 22: 293–330.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018 “The authority of hate speech.” In Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law Volume 3, ed. by John Gardner, Leslie Green and Brian Leiter, 123–152. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N.
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lepore, Ernest, and Matthew Stone
2015Imagination and Convention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017 “Speech Acts.” In The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Yan Huang, 226–243. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewiński, Marcin, Bianca Cepollaro, Steve Oswald and Maciej Witek
(eds) 2023 “Norms of public argument: A speech act perspective.” Topoi 42: 349–541. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, David
1979 “Scorekeeping in a language game.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8: 339–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine
1987Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonald, Lucy
2021 “Your word against mine: The power of uptake.” Synthese 199: 3505–3526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2022 “Reimagining illocutionary force.” The Philosophical Quarterly 72: 918–939. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGowan, Mary-Kate
2003 “Conversational exercitives and the force of pornography.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 31: 155–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017 “On multiple types of silencing.” In Beyond Speech: Pornography and Analytic Feminist Philosophy, ed. by Mari Mikkola, 39–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019Just Words: On Speech and Hidden Harm. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mikkola, Mari
2019Pornography: A Philosophical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pratt, Mary Louise
1977Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Recanati, François
1981Les énoncés performatifs [Performative utterances]. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004Literal Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle Z.
1982 “The things we do with words : Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy.” Language in Society 11: 203–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John R.
1970 “On declarative sentences.” In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, ed. by Roderick A. Jakobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum, 222–272. Waltham, MA: Ginn.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
1984 “On illocutionary types.” Journal of Pragmatics 8: 93–112. [Reprinted in Sbisà 2023.] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001 “Illocutionary force and degrees of strength in language use.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1791–1814. [Reprinted in Sbisà 2023.] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002 “Cognition and narrativity in speech act sequences.” In Rethinking Sequentiality, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Christiane Meierkord, 71–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins [Reprinted in Sbisà 2023.] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006 “Communicating citizenship in verbal interaction: Principles of a speech act oriented discourse analysis.” In Analysing Citizenship Talk, ed. by Heiko Hausendorf and Alfons Bora, 151–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019 “Variety of speech act norms.” In Normativity and Variety of Speech Actions, ed. by Maciej Witek and Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka, 23–50. Leiden: Brill. [Reprinted in Sbisà 2023.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020 “Illocuzione e dislivelli di potere” [Illocution and power imbalance]. In Rae Langton, Linguaggio d’odio e autorità [Hate speech and authority], ed. by Claudia Bianchi and Laura Caponetto, 63–86. Milan–Udine: Mimesis. [English translation in Sbisà 2023.]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021 “(Im)politeness and the human subject.” In The Philosophy of (Im)politeness, ed. by Chaoqun Xie, 157–77. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2023Essays on Speech Acts and Other Topics in Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2024Austinian Themes: Illocution, Action, Knowledge, Truth, and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
1984On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In: J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 28–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1964 “What is a speech act?” In Philosophy in America, ed. by Max Black, 120–136. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1968 “Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts.” The Philosophical Review 77: 405–424. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1969Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1975 “Indirect speech acts.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan: 59–82. [Reprinted in Searle 1979.] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1976 “A classification of illocutionary acts.” Language in Society 5: 1–23. [Reprinted in Searle 1979.] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1979Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1983Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989 “How performatives work.” Linguistics & Philosophy 12: 535–558. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R., and Daniel Vanderveken
1985Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1986Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F.
1950 “On referring.” Mind 59: 320–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1964 “Intention and convention in speech acts.” The Philosophical Review 73: 439–460. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1973 “Austin and ‘locutionary meaning’.” In Essays on J. L. Austin, ed. by Isaiah Berlin, L. W. Forguson, David F. Pears, George Pitcher, John R. Searle, Peter F. Strawson and Geoffrey J. Warnock, 46–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travis, Charles
2000Unshadowed Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno
1972Res Cogitans. Ithaka, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1983Review of Speech Act Classification: A Study in the Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity Verbs by Thomas Ballmer and Waltraud Brennenstuhl. Language 59: 166–175. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985What People Say They Do with Words. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989 “Language on language: Toward metapragmatic universals.” Papers in Pragmatics 3: 1–144.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Warnock, Geoffrey J.
1973 “Some types of performative utterances.” In Essays on J. L. Austin, ed. by Isaiah Berlin, L. W. Forguson, David F. Pears, George Pitcher, John R. Searle, Peter F. Strawson and Geoffrey J. Warnock, 69–89. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda
1994 “Discourse, conversation, dialogue.” In Concepts of Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 49–75. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1991Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Witek, Maciej
2015 “An interactional account of illocutionary practice.” Language Sciences 47: 43–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019 “Coordination and norms in illocutionary interaction.” In Normativity and Variety of Speech Actions, ed. by Maciej Witek and Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka, 66–97. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
1922Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1953Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1958The Blue and Brown Books. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1969Über Gewissheit/On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
1976Studien zur Sprechakttheorie [Studies in Speech Act Theory]. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaefferer, Dietmar
2001 “Deconstructing a classical classification: A typological look at Searle’s concept of illocution type.” Revue internationale de philosophie 55: 209–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue