Objectivism vs. subjectivism

Hans Julius Schneider
Table of contents

1. Objectivism is an epistemological position, according to which to claim truth for a sentence or theory is to claim its agreement with an underlying ‘objective’ reality. The word ‘objective’ is meant to express that the portion of reality in question (in order to be compared with the sentence or theory) can be grasped as it is ‘by itself’, independently of the activities of the speaking person or ‘subject’. In metaphysics the corresponding position is called realism. It claims that there is an objective reality which is independent of any particular characteristics of our efforts to grasp and describe it. And it claims that statements about relations between (parts of) this reality and sentences or theories (e.g. about correspondence or not-correspondence) can be meaningfully made.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Deutscher, M.
1983 Subjecting and objecting. Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dewey, J.
1941 The objectivism–subjectivism of modern philosophy. Journal of Philosophy 38: 533–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frege, G.
1953 The foundations of arithmetic. Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M.
1987 The body in the mind. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Husserl, E.
1962 Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften. Martinus Nijhoff. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenz, K.
1985 Intentionality and its language-dependency. In M. Dascal (ed.) Dialogue: 285–292. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popper, K.
1972 Objective knowledge. Clarendon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rorty, R.
1980 Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, H. J.
1991 Objectivism in pragmatics as a hindrance to intercultural communication. In J. Blommaert & J. Verschueren (eds.) The pragmatics of intercultural and international communication: 163–172. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, C.
1981 Understanding and explanation in the ‘Geisteswissenschaften’. In S. H. Holtzman & C. Leich (eds.) Wittgenstein: To follow a rule: 191–219. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L.
1953 Philosophische Untersuchungen. Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1984 Culture and value. University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Von Wright, G. H.
1971 Explanation and understanding. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue