Mitigation

Marta Albelda & Maria Estellés
University of Valencia
Table of contents

Mitigation commonly refers to a linguistic and rhetorical strategy which has some specific communicative goal in mind, such as making a statement less direct and thus softening the impact of what is being said, being polite, showing respect, protecting the speaker’s image, or reducing the risk of offending the hearer.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Albelda, Marta
2008 “Influence of situational factors on the codification and interpretation of impoliteness.” Pragmatics 18 (4): 751–773.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016 “Sobre la incidencia de la imagen en la atenuación pragmática.” Revista internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 27: 19–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.) 2018 “Estrategias atenuantes en géneros discursivos del español.” Spanish in Context 15 (2): 346–368.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2023 “Mitigation strategies in colloquial conversations: A contrastive approach in European, Cuban, Mexican, Argentinian and Chilean Spanish.” Contrastive Pragmatics 5: 1–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albelda, Marta, Antonio Briz, Ana M. Cestero, Dorota Kotwica and Cristina Villalba
2014 “Ficha metodológica para el análisis pragmático de la atenuación en corpus discursivos del español (ES.POR.ATENUACIÓN).” Oralia 17: 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albelda, Marta and Wiltrud Mihatsch
(eds) 2017 Atenuación e intensificación en diferentes géneros discursivos. Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albelda, Marta and Maria Estellés
2021 “Mitigation revisited: An operative and integrated definition of the pragmatic concept, its strategic values, and its linguistic expression.” Journal of Pragmatics 183: 71–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Albelda, Marta, Ana María Cestero, Silvana Guerrero and Marta Samper
2020 “Variación sociopragmática y geolectal en el uso de atenuación.” Lengua y Habla 24: 1–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla, Claudia Caffi and Marina Sbisá
1991 “Scalar dimensions of illocutionary force.” In Speech Acts: Fiction or Reality?, ed. by Igor Ž. Žagar, 63–76. Ljubljana: International Pragmatics Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper
(eds) 1989 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bravo, Diana
2021 “Atenuación, conflicto interlocutivo e identidad de imagen.” Soprag 9 (2): 184–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio
1995 “La atenuación en la conversación coloquial: Una categoría pragmática.” In El español coloquial: Actas del I Simposio sobre análisis del discurso oral, ed. by Luis Cortés, 103–122. Almería: Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004 “Cortesía verbal codificada y cortesía verbal interpretada en la conversación.” In Pragmática sociocultural: Estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español, ed. by Diana Bravo and Antonio Briz, 67–93. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007 “Para un análisis semántico, pragmático y sociopragmático de la cortesía atenuadora en España y América.” Lingüística Española Actual 29: 5–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017 “Otra vez sobre las funciones de la intensificación en la conversación coloquial.” Boletín de Filología 52 (2): 37–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio and Marta Albelda
2013 “Una propuesta teórica y metodológica para el análisis de la atenuación lingüística en español y portugués: La base de un proyecto en común (ES.POR.ATENUACIÓN).” Onomázein 28: 288–319.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
1999 “On mitigation.” Journal of Pragmatics 31: 881–909. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006 Mitigation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010 “Weakening or strengthening? A case of enantiosemy in Plato’s Gorgias.” In New Approaches to Hedging, ed. by Günther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch and Stefan Schneider, 181–202. London: Emerald Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cestero, Ana María
2020 “Uses and resources of mitigation, in contrast.” Spanish in Context 17 (2): 362–383. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cestero, Ana María and Marta Albelda
2023 “La atenuación en español: Patrones sociolingüísticos y geolectales. Hacia un mapa de la atenuación en español.” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 94: 95–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna
(ed.) 1994 Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Contreras, Josefa
2020 “Mecanismos lingüísticos de atenuación en conversaciones coloquiales españolas y alemanas.” Signos 53 (104): 885–909. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021 “Estrategias de atenuación impersonales en artículos académicos españoles y alemanes.” LFE: Revista de lenguas para fines específicos, 27 (2): 173–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutting, Joan
(ed.) 2007 Vague Language Explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015 “ Dingsbums und so: Beliefs about German vague language.” Journal of Pragmatics 85: 108–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Czerwionka, Lori
2021 “Mitigation in Spanish pragmatics research.” In The Routledge Handbook on Spanish Pragmatics, ed. by Dale Koike and César Félix-Brasdefer, 387–402. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cock, Barbara, Aurely Marsily, Andrea Pizarro, and Marie Rasson
2018 “¿Quién atenúa y cuándo en español? La atenuación en función del género discursivo.” Spanish in Context 15 (2): 305–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dumitrescu, Domnita
2010 “Sobre la atenuación cortés en español y rumano: Unas estrategias comunes.” In Actes du XXV-e Congrès International de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes, ed. by Maria Iliescu, Heidi Siller-Runggaldier and Paul Danler, 371–388. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Égré, Paul and Nathan Klinedinst
2011 Vagueness and Language Use. New York: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Estellés, Maria and Marta Albelda
(eds) 2022 Special Issue on Revisiting problems on pragmatic mitigation: New methodological insights . Journal of Pragmatics 190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Figueras, Carolina
2018 “Atenuación, género discursivo e imagen.” Spanish in Context 15 (2): 260–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021 “Mitigation in discourse: Social, cognitive and affective motivations when exchanging advice.” Journal of Pragmatics 173: 119–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Figueras, Carolina and Dorota Kotwica
(eds) 2020 Special Issue on Evidentiality, epistemicity and mitigation in Spanish . Corpus Pragmatics 4.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiorentini, Ilaria and Andrea Sansó
2017 “Intensifiers between grammar and pragmatics. A lesson from a language contact situation.” In Exploring Intensification: Synchronic, Diachronic and Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by Maria Napoli and Miriam Ravetto, 173–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flores-Ferrán, Nydia
2020 Linguistic Mitigation in English and Spanish: How Speakers Attenuate Expressions. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1980 “Conversational mitigation.” Journal of Pragmatics 4: 341–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010 “Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging.” In New Approaches to Hedging, ed. by Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch and Stefan Schneider, 15–35. London: Emerald Group Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara
2013 Vagueness Markers in Contemporary Italian: Intergenerational Variation and Pragmatic Change. Pavia: University of Pavia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gili Fivela, Barbara and Carla Bazzanella
(eds) 2009 Fenomeni di intensità nell’italiano parlato. Florence: Franco Cesati.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guerrero, Silvana
2021 “La atenuación lingüística en el corpus PRESEEA de Santiago de Chile.”. Alpha 52: 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haley, Jay
1959 “An interactional description of schizophrenia.” Psychiatry 22: 321–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haverkate, Henk
2004 “El análisis de la cortesía comunicativa, categorización pragmalingüística de la cultura española.” In Pragmática sociocultural, ed. by Diana Bravo and Antonio Briz, 55–65. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hernández-Flores, Nieves
1999 “Politeness ideology in Spanish colloquial conversation: The case of advice.” Pragmatics 9 (1): 37–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013 “Actividad de imagen: Caracterización y tipología en la interacción comunicativa.” Pragmática Sociocultural 1 (2): 1–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015 “La actividad de imagen en el discurso oral: Localización y delimitación en la interacción comunicativa.” In Perspectivas socio-pragmáticas y socio-culturales del análisis del discurso, ed. by Diana Bravo and María Bernal, 23–48. Buenos Aires: Dunken.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1984a “Modifying illocutionary force.” Journal of Pragmatics 8: 345–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1984b “Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: Some evidence for hedges as support structures.” Te Reo 27: 47–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hübler, Alex
1983 Understatements and Hedges in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1998 Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johansen, Stine Hulleberg
2020 “A contrastive approach to the types of hedging strategies used in Norwegian and English informal spoken conversations.” Contrastive Pragmatics 2: 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Annette Myre
2009 “ En plan used as a hedge in Spanish teenage language.” In Youngspeak in a Multilingual Perspective, ed. by Anna-Brita Stenström and Annette Myre Jørgensen, 95–115. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas, Sara Smith and Tanja Lüdge
2003 “Interactive aspects of vagueness in conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (12): 1737–1769. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Wiltrud Mihatsch and Stefan Schneider
(eds) 2010 New Approaches to Hedging. Bingley: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
2014 “Politeness in France: How to buy bread politely.” In Politeness in Europe, ed. by Leo Hickey and Miranda Stewart, 29–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William
1984 “Intensity.” In Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, 43–70. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1972 “Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts.” In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. by Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi and Gloria C. Phares, 183–228. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach
1973 “The logic of politeness, or: Minding your P’s and Q’s.” In Papers from the Regional Ninth Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. by Claudia Corum, Cedric Smith-Stark and Ann Weiser, 292–305. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llopis, Ana
2016 “El uso de los aproximativos más o menos y aproximadamente en el continuo variacional.” Spanish in Context 13 (3): 371–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Markkanen, Raija and Hartmut Schröder
(eds) 1997 Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinovski, Bilyana
2006 “Framework for analysis of mitigation in courts.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (12): 2065–2086. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinovski, Bilyana, Wenji Mao, Jonathan Gratch and Stacy Marsella
2005 “Mitigation theory: An integrated approach.” Proceedings of Cognitive Sciences 27: 1407–1412.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mihatsch, Wiltrud
2007 “The construction of vagueness: ‘Sort of’ expressions in Romance languages.” In Aspects of Meaning Construction, ed. by Günter Radden, Klaus-Michael Köpcke, Thomas Berg and Peter Siemund, 225–245. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010a “Sincronía y diacronía del aproximador como .” Revista internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 16: 175–201.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010b “The diachrony of rounders and adaptors: Approximation and unidirectional change.” In New Approaches to Hedging, ed. by Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch and Stefan Schneider, 93–122. Bingley: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013 “Hedges.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Caroll A. Chappelle, 2457–2462. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018 “De la escritura científica a la conversación coloquial adolescente: El caso de ‘tipo’.” Spanish in Context 15 (2): 281–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mihatsch, Wiltrud and Marta Albelda
2016 “Introducción: La atenuación y la intensificación desde una perspectiva semántico-pragmática.” Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 27 (1): 7–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondaca, Lissette
2019 “Approximators and mitigators in Chilean Spanish: The case of ‘como’ and ‘como que’.” Texts in Process 5 (1): 29–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morales, Óscar
2010 Los géneros escritos de la Odontología hispanoamericana: Estructura retórica y estrategias de atenuación en artículos de investigación, casos clínicos y artículos de investigación. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oms, Sergi and Elia Zardini
2019 “The sorites paradox in linguistics.” In The Sorites Paradox, ed. by Sergi Oms and Elia Zardini, 246–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann
1999 Whales, Candlelight and Stuff Like That: General Extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011 “Vagueness and hedging.” In Pragmatics of Society, ed. by Gisle Andersen and Karin Aijmer, 293–318. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palacios, Niktelol
2019 “Funciones y mecanismos de la atenuación en PRESEEA-Puebla: Instrucción educativa alta.” In Voces de la lingüística mexicana contemporánea, ed. by Niktelol Palacios, 235–270. México: El Colegio de México. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen, Joel Frader and Charles Bosk
1982 “On hedging in physician–physician discourse.” In Linguistics and the Professions, ed. by Robert J. Di Pietro, 83–97. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor
1978 “Cognitive representations of semantic categories.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104: 192–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samper, Marta
2017 “Análisis sociolingüístico de la atenuación en el español de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.” In Atenuación e intensificación en géneros discursivos, ed. by Marta Albelda and Wiltrud Mihatsch, 153–168. Madrid-Frankfurt: Iberoamericana/Vervuert. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisá, Marina
2001 “Illocutionary force and degrees of strength in language use.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1791–1814. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Stefan
2013 “Atenuación léxica y sintáctica.” Oralia 16: 335–356. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017 “Las dimensiones de la intensificación y de la atenuación.” In Atenuación e intensificación en diferentes géneros discursivos, ed. by Marta Albelda and Wiltrud Mihatsch, 23–42. Madrid: Iberoamericana/Vervuert. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2007 “Theories of identity and the analysis of face.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 639–656. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thaler, Verena
2012 “Mitigation as modification of illocutionary force.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 907–919. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, Stella
1988 “Intercultural conflicts: A face-negotiation theory.” In Theories in Intercultural Communication, ed. by Young Yun Kim and William B. Gudykunst, 213–235. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres, Yasmin
2020 La atenuación en el habla de Barranquilla: Un estudio sociolingüístico. Barranquilla: Universidad del Atlántico.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen
2011 “A facework system of minimal politeness: Oral argument in appellate court.” Journal of Politeness Research 7: 123–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Villalba, Cristina
2017 Actividades de imagen, atenuación e impersonalidad en los juicios orales. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021 “Recognising mitigation: Three tests for its identification.” Journal of Pragmatics 173: 68–79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam
2013 “The emergence of tipo[-N] in Italian.” In Synchrony and Diachrony: A Dynamic Interface, ed by. Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri and Piera Mo, 283–311. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam and Laura Collu
2017 “Intentional vagueness: A corpus-based analysis of Italian and German.” In Exploring Intensification: Synchronic, Diachronic and Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, ed. by Maria Napoli and Miriam Ravetto, 371–389. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue