Intentionality

Jan Nuyts
Table of contents

This contribution is meant to offer a brief introduction to (some of) the intricacies of the notion of human intentions and intentionality, with special reference to their role in language behavior. Intention/intentionality is meant here (in a narrow sense – see below) as the theoretical concept which is generally invoked to account for the purposefulness or goal-directedness of human behavior (or ‘action’), linguistic and otherwise. Intuitively, this is a straightforward concept. It is an essential part of our ‘folk psychology’: we often wonder whether things people do are intentional (i.e., done on purpose) or not, and the notion is thereby taken to refer to an element ‘inside’ a person which motivates him/her to act in certain ways. (Thus, the notion is crucial in determining ‘guilt’ in many legal systems.) Not surprisingly, then, the term is quite common in ‘ordinary’ language use: utterances like sorry, I didn’t do that intentionally or beware of that guy, his intentions are bad or I intend to finish that paper by tomorrow sound very familiar. Scientifically, however, the notion turns out to be extremely volatile and difficult to grasp. Especially in philosophy, it has received some attention, yet without this leading – not even remotely – to a consensus even on the bare essentials of what a theory of intentionality ought to look like. And although most (empirical-)scientific theories of human behavior axiomatically accept the notion (explicitly or implicitly) as a critical ‘causal force’, very few dare to venture into its nature and phenomenology. Hence, basic questions such as ‘what is intentionality’ (beyond the almost tautological statement that it involves having a purpose or an aim with something), ‘how does it work’, ‘how does it relate to (types of) behavior’, ‘how should it be situated in a wider concept of human cognitive and social functioning’, etc. remain largely unresolved. Thus, the notion belongs in the ‘hall of scientific mysteries’, next to notions such as ‘self’, ‘consciousness’, ‘attention’, or ‘will’ (many of which are no doubt directly related to the concept of intentionality – see Section 1).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Anscombe, G.E.M.
1957 Intention. Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, J.L.
1962 How to do things with words. Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentano, F.
1874 Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt. Ducker.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, J.
1987 Meaning without intention. Papers in Pragmatics 1(2): 80–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992 Meaning without intention: Lessons from divination. In J.H. Hill & J.T. Irvine (eds.): 48–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bratman, M.E.
1987 Intention, plans, and practical reason. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990 What is intention?. In P.R. Cohen et al. (eds.): 15–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burkhardt, A.
(ed.) 1990 Speech acts, meaning and intentions. De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carbaugh, D.
(ed.) 1990 Cultural communication and intercultural contact. Erlbaum.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castañeda, H.-N.
1975 Thinking and doing. Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H.H.
1992 Arenas of language use. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996 Using language. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H.H. & D. Wilkes-Gibbs et al.
(eds.) 1990 Referring as a collaborative process. In P.R. Cohen (eds.). 463–493.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, P.R., J. Morgan & M.E. Pollack
(eds.) 1990 Intentions in communication. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copi, I.M.
1978 Introduction to logic , 5th ed. Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dascal, M. & A. Idan
1989 From individual to collective action. In F. Vandamme & R. Pinxten (eds.). The philosophy of Leo Apostel: 133–148. Communication and Cognition.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, D.
1980 Essays on actions and events. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dennett, D.
1987 The intentional stance. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duranti, A.
1988 Intentions, language, and social action in a Samoan context. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 13–33.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992 Intentions self, and responsibility: An essay in Samoan ethnopragmatics. In J.H. Hill & J.T. Irvine (eds.): 24–47.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, J.A.
1975 The language of thought. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987 Psychosemantics. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.
1957 Meaning. Philosophical Review 66: 377–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1969 Utterer’s meaning and intentions. Philosophical Review 78: 147–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989 Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grosz, B.J. & C.L. Sidner
1990 Plans for discourse. In P.R Cohen et al. (eds.): 417–444.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harnish, R.M.
1990 Speech acts and intentionality. In A. Burkhardt (ed.): 169–193.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hill, J.H. & J.T. Irvine
(eds.) 1992 Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hintikka, J.
1975 The intentions of intentionality and other new models for modalities. Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobbs, J.
1990 Artificial intelligence and collective intentionality. In CohenP.R et al. (eds.): 445–459.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Husserl, E.
1913 Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hymes, D.
1990 Epilogue to The things we do with words. In CarbaughD. (ed.): 419–429.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1983 Semantics and Cognition. MIT-Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1987 Consciousness and the Computational Mind. MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kempen, G.
1977 Man’s sentence generator. In M De Mey et al. (eds.) CC77: 157–164. Communication and Cognition.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M.
1989 Speaking. MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liedtke, F.W.
1990 Representational semantics and illocutionary acts. In A. Burkhardt (ed.): 194–209.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mccawley, J.D.
1981 Everything that linguists have always wanted to know about logic but were ashamed to ask. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meinong, A.
1904 Untersuchungen zur Gegenstandstheorie und Psychologie. Barth.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuyts, J.
1992 Aspects of a cognitive-pragmatic theory of language. John Benjamins.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1993a Intentions and the functions of language in communication. Protosoziologie 4:15–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1993b Representation and communication: Searle’s distinction revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 20: 591–597. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1993c On determining the functions of language. Semiotica 94: 201–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994 The intentional and the sociocultural in language use. Pragmatics & Cognition 2: 237–268.  BoPGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossaldo, M.Z.
1982 The things we do with words. Language in Society 11: 203–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, W. & R.M. Shiffrin
1977 Controlled and automatic human information processing, I: Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review 84: 1–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J.R.
1969 Speech acts. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1983 Intentionality. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1986 Meaning, communication, and representation. In R. Grandy & R. Warner (eds.) Philosophical grounds of rationality: 209–226. Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989 Individual intentionality and social phenomena in the theory of speech acts. In G. Deledalle (ed.) Semiotics and pragmatics: 3–17. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990a Collective intentions and actions. In P.R Cohen et al. (eds.): 401–415.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990b Epilogue to the taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In D. Carbaugh (ed.): 409–417.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shiffrin, R.M. & W. Schneider
1977 Controlled and automatic human information processing, II: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review 84: 127–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R.
1984 Inquiry. MIT Press.  MetBibGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tuomela, R. & K. Miller
1988 We-intentions. Philosophical Studies 53: 367–389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
 
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue